AN ENSEMBLE-BASED APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL PREDICTION MODELS FOR FUTURE-ONSET HEART FAILURE AND CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE USING MACHINE LEARNING

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2046
Author(s):  
Karim Taha ◽  
Heather Joan Ross ◽  
Mohammad Peikari ◽  
Brigitte Mueller ◽  
Chun-Po Steve Fan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chayakrit Krittanawong ◽  
Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk ◽  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Kipp W. Johnson ◽  
...  

Abstract Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1032-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alind Gupta ◽  
Justin J. Slater ◽  
Devon Boyne ◽  
Nicholas Mitsakakis ◽  
Audrey Béliveau ◽  
...  

Objectives. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death and disease burden worldwide, causing 1 in 7 deaths in the United States alone. Risk prediction models that can learn the complex causal relationships that give rise to CAD from data, instead of merely predicting the risk of disease, have the potential to improve transparency and efficacy of personalized CAD diagnosis and therapy selection for physicians, patients, and other decision makers. Methods. We use Bayesian networks (BNs) to model the risk of CAD using the Z-Alizadehsani data set—a published real-world observational data set of 303 Iranian patients at risk for CAD. We also describe how BNs can be used for incorporation of background knowledge, individual risk prediction, handling missing observations, and adaptive decision making under uncertainty. Results. BNs performed on par with machine-learning classifiers at predicting CAD and showed better probability calibration. They achieved a mean 10-fold area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 ± 0.04, which was comparable with the performance of logistic regression with L1 or L2 regularization (AUC: 0.92 ± 0.06), support vector machine (AUC: 0.92 ± 0.06), and artificial neural network (AUC: 0.91 ± 0.05). We describe the use of BNs to predict with missing data and to adaptively calculate prognostic values of individual variables under uncertainty. Conclusion. BNs are powerful and versatile tools for risk prediction and health outcomes research that can complement traditional statistical techniques and are particularly useful in domains in which information is uncertain or incomplete and in which interpretability is important, such as medicine.


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
B PONIKOWSKA ◽  
E JANKOWSKA ◽  
K WEGRZYNOWSKATEODORCZYK ◽  
S POWIERZA ◽  
L BORODULINNADZIEJA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document