Publishing as Resident Education: The ASCP Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
V. Madaan ◽  
C. Kratochvil
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Member ◽  
Child Psychiatry ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Clinical Psychopharmacology ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Educational Models ◽  
Editorial Work ◽  
Senior Faculty Member

The ACGME has defined six core competencies for residents, including medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. While clinical learning and experience contribute to improving interpersonal skills, professionalism, and general medical knowledge, residents and training programs struggle with educational models that help address more rigorous education in evidence-based medicine and scholarly projects. In this regard, we developed a collaborative academic project for a resident and faculty member that exemplifies these ACGME requirements in a practical and purposeful manner. This project was aimed to enhance the resident's psychopharmacology knowledge, learn evidence based child psychiatry, and develop writing and editing skills; a means to improve clinical as well as academic abilities.One senior faculty member and one child psychiatry resident were invited to become section editors for the child and adolescent section of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum for psychiatry residents. Authors from various university programs nationally, prepared or revised lectures based on their expertise and areas of interest. The authors were provided with as much support and assistance as they desired from the section editors. The resident author/editor met in person with the faculty to plan the project and routinely throughout the process, with frequent e-mail communication throughout the writing and editorial work. After submission of lectures, the section was reviewed and revised by the resident and faculty editors, and submitted for publication. This mentorship experience with psychopharmacology curriculum is an exciting tool that will continue through biennial revisions.

Teaching future professors how to teach

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
P. L. Bishop ◽  
T. Yu ◽  
M. J. Kupferle ◽  
D. Moll ◽  
C. Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Effective Teaching ◽  
Faculty Member ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Teaching Experience ◽  
The Other ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Faculty Advisor ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Senior Faculty Member

This paper describes a course designed to provide hands-on teaching experience to future professors and to incorporate techniques for more effective teaching. A team of Ph.D. candidates, under the direction of a senior faculty member, prepared a new course from beginning to end and then offered it to a class of graduate students. The course was developed using the unit map concept so that the presentations by the five student-instructors complemented and built upon one another. Immediately after each class, feedback was given to the student-instructors by the faculty advisor and the other student-instructors. Review of video tapes of the lecture reinforced this feedback. At the completion of the course, both students and student-instructors were surveyed as to the effectiveness of the course and the student-instructors. This teaching experience and the feedback obtained from the surveys will be invaluable to the student-instructors in their future development.

The Lone Ranger, Tonto, and Katherine: What Is the Script for a Senior Faculty Member?

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 379-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Grace Hendrix
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Member ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
Senior Faculty Member

The qualitative methodological approach of autoethnography is used to compose a narrative relating to my experiences at this stage in my career. More specifically, my inner thoughts as a senior faculty member, nearing the end of her career, are laid bare for the audience. The conflictual nature of deciding when, how, and whether to make an exit is shared across four themes: self-concept, new knowledge, aging, and retirement.

scholarly journals Older and Wiser? The Need to Reexamine the Impact of Health Professionals Age and Experience on Competency-Based Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237796082110290
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Kristen Hicks-Roof ◽  
Chloe E. Bailey ◽  
Hanadi Y. Hamadi
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Delivery of healthcare services makes up a complex system and it requires providers to be competent and to be able to integrate each of the institute of medicine’s (IOM) 5 core competencies into practice. However, healthcare providers are challenged with the task to be able to understand and apply the IOM core competencies into practice. Objective The purpose of the study was to examine the factors that influence health professional’s likelihood of accomplishing the IOM core competencies. Methods A cross-sectional study design was used to administer a validated online survey to health providers. This survey was distributed to physicians, nursing professionals, specialists, and allied healthcare professionals. The final sample included 3,940 participants who completed the survey. Results The study findings show that younger health professionals more consistently practice daily competencies than their older counterparts, especially in the use of evidence-based practice, informatics, and working in interdisciplinary teams. Less experienced health professionals more consistently applied quality improvement methods but less consistently used evidence-based practice compared to their more experienced counterparts. Conclusion There is a need to understand how health professionals’ age and experience impact their engagement with IOM’s core competencies. This study highlights the need for educational resources on the competencies to be tailored to health providers’ age and experience.

scholarly journals What is that’s going on here? A multidimensional time concept is foundational to framing for decision making in situations of uncertainty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Raia ◽  
Lezel Legados ◽  
Irina Silacheva ◽  
Jennifer B. Plotkin ◽  
Srikanth Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Dominant Culture ◽  
Cultural Changes ◽  
Cultural Paradigm ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Cultural Dominance ◽  
K 12

AbstractSTEM disciplines are the dominant culture in K-12 education. With its study of organs and diseases that afflict patients’ bodies, Western evidence-based medicine is seen and understood in the modern cultural paradigm as a science and as the practice in which a subject, the doctor, acts on an object; the patient’s body—a dominant culture in the patient’s journey. However, with the continually evolving high-technological and medical knowledge, life-saving therapeutic options are life-changing. They can range from changes in the diet, requiring structural and cultural changes in family life, to changes related to the experiences of learning to live tethered to a machine that is partly inside and partly outside one’s body or with somebody else’s heart. In this article, we show how competing needs to personalize care for the patient as a person forcefully emerge in response to evidence-based medicine’s global cultural dominance. We highlight two fundamental issues emerging in decision-making processes: (1) Framing evidence-based knowledge, uncertainties of the course of the disease and options, and (2) working with different, equally important, and often at odds conceptions of time in the care for the Other. Through the longitudinal analysis of moment-to-moment interactions in high-tech medicine encounters of a patient, his family, and the team caring for them, we show how framing and different conceptions of time emerge as issues, are profoundly interconnected, and are addressed by participants to care for a patient confronting existential decisions.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Assessment of Struggling Learners Referred to a Graduate Medical Education Remediation Program

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Warburton ◽  
Eric Goren ◽  
C. Jessica Dine
Keyword(s):  
Core Competencies ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Comprehensive Assessment ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Disciplinary Action ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Struggling Learners ◽  
Next Accreditation System

ABSTRACT Background  Implementation of the Next Accreditation System has provided a standardized framework for identifying learners not meeting milestones, but there is as yet no corresponding framework for remediation. Objective  We developed a comprehensive assessment process that allows correct diagnosis of a struggling learner's deficit(s) to promote successful remediation. Methods  At the University of Pennsylvania, resident learners within the Department of Medicine who are not meeting milestones are referred to the Early Intervention Remediation Committee (EIRC). The EIRC, composed of 14 faculty members with expertise in remediation, uses a standardized process to assess learners' deficits. These faculty members categorize primary deficits as follows: medical knowledge, clinical reasoning, organization and efficiency, professionalism, and communication skills. The standardized process of assessment includes an analysis of the learner's file, direct communication with evaluators, an interview focused on learner perception of the problem, screening for underlying medical or psychosocial issues, and a review of systems for deficits in the 6 core competencies. Participants were surveyed after participating in this process. Results  Over a 2-year period, the EIRC assessed and developed remediation plans for 4% of learners (14 of a total 342). Following remediation and reassessment, the identified problems were satisfactorily resolved in all cases with no disciplinary action. While the process was time intensive, an average of 45 hours per learner, the majority of faculty and residents rated it as positive and beneficial. Conclusions  This structured assessment process identifies targeted areas for remediation and adds to the tools available to Clinical Competency Committees.

scholarly journals Evidence-based practice of stereotactic radiosurgery: Outcomes from an educational course for neurosurgery and radiation oncology residents

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Swathi Chidambaram ◽  
Sergio W. Guadix ◽  
John Kwon ◽  
Justin Tang ◽  
Amanda Rivera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Before And After

Background: As the field of brain and spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) continues to grow, so will the need for a comprehensive evidence base. However, it is unclear to what degree trainees feel properly equipped to use SRS. We assess the perceptions and comfort level reported by neurosurgery and radiation oncology residents concerning the evidence-based practice of SRS. Methods: A continuing medical education (CME) course provided peer-reviewed updates regarding treatment with intracranial and spinal SRS. Presentations were given by neurosurgery and radiation oncology residents with mentorship by senior faculty. To gauge perceptions regarding SRS, attendees were surveyed. Responses before and after the course were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test in R statistical software. Results: Participants reported the greatest knowledge improvements concerning data registries (P < 0.001) and clinical trials (P = 0.026). About 82% of all (n = 17) radiation oncology and neurosurgery residents either agreed or strongly agreed that a brain and spine SRS rotation would be beneficial in their training. However, only 47% agreed or strongly agreed that one was currently part of their training. In addition, knowledge gains in SRS indications (P = 0.084) and ability to seek collaboration with colleagues (P = 0.084) showed notable trends. Conclusion: There are clear knowledge gaps shared by potential future practitioners of SRS. Specifically, knowledge regarding SRS data registries, indications, and clinical trials offer potential areas for increased educational focus. Furthermore, the gap between enthusiasm for increased SRS training and the current availability of such training at medical institutions must be addressed.

Teaching Technology to Digital Immigrants

2011 ◽  
pp. 870-879
Author(s):  
Danika Rockett ◽  
Tamara Powell ◽  
Amy Massey Vessel ◽  
Kimberly Kimbell-Lopez ◽  
Carrice Cummins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Education ◽  
Instructional Technology ◽  
Faculty Member ◽  
Technology Skills ◽  
Digital Immigrants ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Disaster Plan ◽  
Teaching Technology ◽  
Hurricanes Katrina And Rita ◽  
The University

Someone has to prepare faculty who are in need of technology skills. For example, in Louisiana, in response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, every faculty member at the university level has to have a Blackboard presence and a disaster plan so that classes can continue in the event of a catastrophe. Those faculty called upon to assist their peers in complying with the directives are often chosen only because they are more comfortable than others with technology. Often, trainees are uncomfortable in such training, and senior faculty, often later “digital immigrants,” can be resentful. The researchers and authors of this paper have garnered $443,658 in grants involving training faculty in instructional technology. Through their experiences, the authors and researchers have isolated seven key practices that make such training successful. This article describes those practices and supports the findings of the primary research with secondary research on andragogy and Marc Prensky’s ideas of the literacy divide that exists between “digital natives” and “digital immigrants.” By considering the basic tenets of adult education, we can be better facilitators of valuable training sessions that will bridge the digital divide.

scholarly journals Self-Assessment on the Competencies and Reported Improvement Priorities for Pediatrics Residents

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Ting T. Li ◽  
Daniel J. Tancredi ◽  
Ann E. Burke ◽  
Ann Guillot ◽  
Susan Guralnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Core Competencies ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Self Directed Learning ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Individualized Learning ◽  
Learning Plan ◽  
Directed Learning ◽  
Level Of Training ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Background Self-assessment and self-directed learning are essential to becoming an effective physician. Objective To identify factors associated with resident self-assessment on the competencies, and to determine whether residents chose areas of self-assessed relative weakness as areas for improvement in their Individualized Learning Plan (ILP). Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the American Academy of Pediatrics' PediaLink ILP database. Pediatrics residents self-assessed their competency in the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies using a color-coded slider scale with end anchors “novice” and “proficient” (0–100), and then chose at least 1 competency to improve. Multivariate regression explored the relationship between overall confidence in core competencies, sex, level of training, and degree (MD or DO) status. Correlation examined whether residents chose to improve competencies in which they rated themselves as lower. Results A total of 4167 residents completed an ILP in academic year 2009–2010, with residents' ratings improving from advanced beginner (48 on a 0–100 scale) in postgraduate year-1 residents (PGY-1s) to competent (75) in PGY-3s. Residents rated themselves as most competent in professionalism (mean, 75.3) and least competent in medical knowledge (mean, 55.8) and systems-based practice (mean, 55.2). In the adjusted regression model, residents' competency ratings increased by level of training and whether they were men. In PGY-3s, there was no difference between men and women. Residents selected areas for improvement that correlated to competencies where they had rated themselves lower (P &lt; .01). Conclusion Residents' self-assessment of their competencies increased by level of training, although residents rated themselves as least competent in medical knowledge and systems-based practice, even as PGY-3s. Residents tended to choose subcompetencies, which they rated as lower to focus on improving.

scholarly journals New journals for publishing medical case reports

2016 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine G. Akers, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Vast Number ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
Hierarchy Of Evidence ◽  
Predatory Publishing ◽  
Reputable Journal ◽  
Acceptance Rates ◽  
Based Medicine

Because they do not rank highly in the hierarchy of evidence and are not frequently cited, case reports describing the clinical circumstances of single patients are seldom published by medical journals. However, many clinicians argue that case reports have significant educational value, advance medical knowledge, and complement evidence-based medicine. Over the last several years, a vast number (~160) of new peer-reviewed journals have emerged that focus on publishing case reports. These journals are typically open access and have relatively high acceptance rates. However, approximately half of the publishers of case reports journals engage in questionable or ‘‘predatory’’ publishing practices. Authors of case reports may benefit from greater awareness of these new publication venues as well as an ability to discriminate between reputable and non-reputable journal publishers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document