Pathologic Complete Response With Six Compared With Three Cycles of Neoadjuvant Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel and Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor in Operable Breast Cancer: Results of ABCSG-14

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-90
Author(s):  
E.P. Mamounas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Pathologic Complete Response With Six Compared With Three Cycles of Neoadjuvant Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Operable Breast Cancer: Results of ABCSG-14

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 2012-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther G. Steger ◽  
Arik Galid ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
Brigitte Mlineritsch ◽  
Alois Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Purpose Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer downstages tumors initially not suitable for breast-conserving surgery. A pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a surrogate for longer overall survival, but this beneficial effect remains to be established. This phase III trial evaluated whether doubling the number of cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the pCR rate. Patients and Methods Patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer (T1-4a-c, N±, M0; stage I to III) were eligible and randomly assigned to either three or six cycles of epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 3 through 10 (ED+G), every 21 days. The primary end point was the pCR rate of the breast tumor. Secondary end points were pathologic nodal status after surgery and the rate of breast-conserving surgery. Results A total of 292 patients were accrued, and 288 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety. Groups were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Six cycles of ED+G, compared with three cycles, resulted in a significantly higher pCR rate (18.6% v 7.7%, respectively; P = .0045), a higher percentage of patients with negative axillary status (56.6% v 42.8%, respectively; P = .02), and a trend towards more breast-conserving surgery (75.9% v 66.9%, respectively; P = .10). Rates of adverse events were similar, and no patients died on treatment. Conclusion Doubling the number of neoadjuvant ED+G cycles from three to six results in higher rates of pCR and negative axillary nodal status with no excess of adverse effects. Thus, six cycles of ED+G should be the standard neoadjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer if this combination is chosen.

Dose-Dense Doxorubicin, Docetaxel, and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support With or Without Tamoxifen as Preoperative Therapy in Patients With Operable Carcinoma of the Breast: A Randomized, Controlled, Open Phase IIb Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (15) ◽  
pp. 3506-3515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Serban D. Costa ◽  
Günter Raab ◽  
Jens-Uwe Blohmer ◽  
Holger Eidtmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Status ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Nonsignificant Difference ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of adding tamoxifen to a preoperative dose-dense doxorubicin and docetaxel regimen on the pathologic response of primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (tumor size ≥ 3 cm, N0 to 2, M0) were prospectively randomized to receive every 14 days a total of four cycles of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2, either with (ADocT) or without (ADoc) simultaneous tamoxifen. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was routinely given on days 5 to 10. Surgery followed 8 to 10 weeks after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Within 14 months, 250 patients were included in the study at 56 centers. Of 992 planned cycles, 97.9% were administered. Pathologically complete remission (pCR) with no detectable viable tumor cells was achieved in 9.7%. There was a nonsignificant difference of −1.2% in favor of ADoc, with a 95% confidence interval of −8.6% to 6.2%. A further 2.4% had only noninvasive tumor residues, and 13.8% had focal invasive residues. Complete and partial responses detected by palpation were observed in 28.9% and 52.4%, respectively. The response rates (complete and partial) by best appropriate imaging methods were 77.5% and 67.5% for ADocT and ADoc, respectively. Breast conservation was possible in 68.8% of the patients. A tendency toward more frequent toxic events was observed with ADocT treatment. Significant predictors of pCR to chemotherapy were negative lymph node and negative estrogen receptor status. CONCLUSION: A dose-dense regimen of ADoc with G-CSF offers high compliance, moderate toxicity, and rapid efficacy as a form of preoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Concurrent treatment with tamoxifen for 8 weeks could not improve the pathologic response rate.

scholarly journals Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Expression in Breast Cancer and Its Association with Carbonic Anhydrase IX and Immune Checkpoints

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1022
Author(s):  
Shawn C. Chafe ◽  
Nazia Riaz ◽  
Samantha Burugu ◽  
Dongxia Gao ◽  
Samuel C. Y. Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrase ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Carcinoma Cells ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrase Ix ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Purpose: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and hypoxia modulate the tumour immune microenvironment. In model systems, hypoxia-induced carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) has been associated with G-CSF and immune responses, including M2 polarization of macrophages. We investigated whether these associations exist in human breast cancer specimens, their relation to breast cancer subtypes, and clinical outcome. Methods: Using validated protocols and prespecified scoring methodology, G-CSF expression on carcinoma cells and CD163 expression on tumour-associated macrophages were assayed by immunohistochemistry and applied to a tissue microarray series of 2960 primary excision specimens linked to clinicopathologic, biomarker, and outcome data. Results: G-CSFhigh expression showed a significant positive association with ER negativity, HER2 positivity, presence of CD163+ M2 macrophages, and CAIX expression. In univariate analysis, G-CSFhigh phenotype was associated with improved survival in non-luminal cases, although the CAIX+ subset had a significantly adverse prognosis. A significant positive association was observed between immune checkpoint biomarkers on tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and both G-CSF- and CAIX-expressing carcinoma cells. Immune checkpoint biomarkers correlated significantly with favourable prognosis in G-CSFhigh/non-luminal cases independent of standard clinicopathological features. Conclusions: The prognostic associations linking G-CSF to immune biomarkers and CAIX strongly support their immunomodulatory roles in the tumour microenvironment.

Effect of different chemotherapy regimens on peripheral-blood stem-cell collections in patients with breast cancer receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 684-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Demirer ◽  
C D Buckner ◽  
B Storer ◽  
K Lilleby ◽  
S Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of chemotherapy regimens on peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) yields in patients with breast cancer who receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred patients with breast cancer received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 for dose (CY) (n = 10), CY and etoposide 600 mg/m2 (CE) (n = 13), CE and cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (CEP) (n = 19), or CY and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 (n = 58), followed by G-CSF. PBSC collections were initiated when the WBC count recovered to greater than 1 x 10(9)/L. A multivariate analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different chemotherapy regimens and patient variables on PBSC collections as measured by the yield of CD34+ cells. RESULTS The medians of average daily CD34+ cell yields for patients who received paclitaxel plus CY, CE, and CEP with G-CSF were 12.9, 11.03, and 5.37 x 10(6)/kg, respectively, compared with 2.02 x 10(6)/kg in the reference group that received CY with G-CSF (P = < .0001, .002, and .09, respectively). On first-day collections, patients who received paclitaxel plus CY, CE, and CEP with G-CSF yielded medians of 11.07, 8.09, and 3.52 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively, compared with 0.90 x 10(6)/kg in the reference group that received CY with G-CSF (P = .0006, .02, and .09, respectively). The number of previous cycles of chemotherapy, previous radiotherapy, marrow involvement, and phase and stage of disease did not have statistically significant effects on CD34+ cell yield. CONCLUSION Combination chemotherapy regimens were superior to single-agent CY for the mobilization of CD34+ cells.

Five-day course of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with prolonged neutropenia after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is a safe and cost-effective schedule to maintain dose-intensity.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1573-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ribas ◽  
J Albanell ◽  
J Bellmunt ◽  
L A Solé-Calvo ◽  
B Bermejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Median Percentage ◽  
Subsequent Cycle ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE To analyze the safety and efficacy of a short course of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to maintain dose-intensity of subsequent cycles of chemotherapy after a prior episode of prolonged neutropenia, without febrile complications, in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients undergoing adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or doxorubicin-CMF for stages I to II breast cancer were included after having chemotherapy delays due to neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 1.5 x 10(9)/L) on day 22. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously on days 15 to 19 of each subsequent cycle. RESULTS None of the patients included in this study had to be admitted to the hospital for fever and neutropenia. The median percentage of the projected dose-intensity for CMF or doxorubicin-CMF on an intent-to-treat basis was 0.994, which was significantly higher than the delivered dose-intensity before the start of G-CSF treatment (P < .0001). Patients who received concomitant G-CSF and radiotherapy achieved a similar dose-intensity as patients who did not undergo radiotherapy. Seven patients discontinued G-CSF treatment due to musculoskeletal pain. These patients had more subsequent cycle delays because of day 22 neutropenia than the 25 patients who followed the G-CSF schedule (P = .0028). CONCLUSION A 5-day course of G-CSF in patients with prior chemotherapy delays due to prolonged neutropenia seems to be a safe and cost-effective schedule to maintain CMF or doxorubicin-CMF dose-intensity in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document