139 EVIDENCE OF OBJECTIVE BURDEN, SUBJECTIVE BURDEN, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IMPACTS ON INFORMAL CAREGIVERS OF FRAIL OLDER PERSONS WHO FALL

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
M. Faes ◽  
M.F. Reelick ◽  
B.W.M. Schalk ◽  
E. Ek ◽  
R.A. Esselink ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner B. F. Brouwer ◽  
N. Job A. van Exel ◽  
Bernard van de Berg ◽  
Huib J. Dinant ◽  
Marc A. Koopmanschap ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Manuel Ponsoda Tornal ◽  
Amelia Díaz Martínez

The aim of this work is to determine the role that social support, coping, optimism, quality of life, resilience and life satisfaction have on the relationship between objective and subjective burden on family caregivers of Alzheimer patients. Method: Participants: 140 caregivers of Alzheimer patients. Instruments: Sociodemographic Data; CBI Caregiver Burden Scale; COPE Coping Styles Scale; DUKE.UNC Social Support Scale; LOT-R, Life Orientation TestRevised; QOLLTI-F, Quality of Life in Life Threatening Illness Scale–Family Carers Version; CD-RISC, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; SWLS, Satisfaction with Life Scale. Procedure: Implementation of scales in an individual, voluntary, anonymous way, including informed consent. Results: All variables studied produced significant differences between caregivers with high and low subjective burden, except time caring measured in months/years. Relationships between the variables were significant, with the exception of months/years caring and coping styles. Social support, optimism, satisfaction and quality of life have an important mediating role between objective and subjective burden. Conclusions and discussion: Social support, optimism, satisfaction and quality of life have been decisive as mediating variables between hours a day taking care (objective burden) and subjective burden. This result represents a step forward in the analysis and subsequent creation of intervention programs in family caregivers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1281-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Lutomski ◽  
N. J. A. van Exel ◽  
G. I. J. M. Kempen ◽  
E. P. Moll van Charante ◽  
W. P. J. den Elzen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 557-562
Author(s):  
Naoki Maki ◽  
Harumi Sakamoto ◽  
Yu Takata ◽  
Yuki Mutsukura ◽  
Wijesinghe Ashoka ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046600
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Hill ◽  
Rachael Moorin ◽  
Susan Slatyer ◽  
Christina Bryant ◽  
Keith Hill ◽  
...  

IntroductionThere are personal and societal benefits from caregiving; however, caregiving can jeopardise caregivers’ health. The Further Enabling Care at Home (FECH+) programme provides structured nurse support, through telephone outreach, to informal caregivers of older adults following discharge from acute hospital care to home. The trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the FECH+ programme on caregivers’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after care recipients’ hospital discharge.Methods and analysisA multisite, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with blinded baseline and outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis, adhering to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines will be conducted. Participants (N=925 dyads) comprising informal home caregiver (18 years or older) and care recipient (70 years or older) will be recruited when the care recipient is discharged from hospital. Caregivers of patients discharged from wards in three hospitals in Australia (one in Western Australia and two in Queensland) are eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The intervention group receive the FECH+ programme, which provides structured support and problem-solving for the caregiver after the care recipient’s discharge, in addition to usual care. The control group receives usual care. The programme is delivered by a registered nurse and comprises six 30–45 min telephone support sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome is caregivers’ HRQOL measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life—eight dimensions. Secondary outcomes include caregiver preparedness, strain and distress and use of healthcare services. Changes in HRQOL between groups will be compared using a mixed regression model that accounts for the correlation between repeated measurements.Ethics and disseminationParticipants will provide written informed consent. Ethics approvals have been obtained from Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Curtin University, Griffith University, Gold Coast Health Service and government health data linkage services. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12620000060943.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (S2) ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
Mohd Hatta Abdul Mutalip ◽  
Faizul Akmal Abdul Rahim ◽  
Hasmah Mohamed Haris ◽  
Norzawati Yoep ◽  
Amierul Fikri Mahmud ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 100085
Author(s):  
Alex Presciutti ◽  
Mary M. Newman ◽  
Jim Grigsby ◽  
Ana-Maria Vranceanu ◽  
Jonathan A. Shaffer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document