9316 Follow-up study in high-risk uveal melanoma patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 582
Author(s):  
P. Mariani ◽  
V. Servois ◽  
S. Piperno-Neumann ◽  
J. Couturier ◽  
C. Plancher ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 168 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Won Hur ◽  
Soo-Hee Choi ◽  
Je-Yeon Yun ◽  
Myong-Wuk Chon ◽  
Jun Soo Kwon

Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1049-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Morioka ◽  
Jun-ichiro Hamada ◽  
Tatemi Todaka ◽  
Shigetoshi Yano ◽  
Yutaka Kai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wending Li ◽  
Yifan Meng ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Xiaodong Cheng ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101303
Author(s):  
Lukas Frans Ocias ◽  
Peter Wilhelmsson ◽  
Johanna Sjöwall ◽  
Anna Jonsson Henningsson ◽  
Marika Nordberg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C Schefler ◽  
Alison Skalet ◽  
Scott C N Oliver ◽  
John Mason ◽  
Anthony B Daniels ◽  
...  

Aim: The Clinical Application of DecisionDx-UM Gene Expression Assay Results study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) patients in a large, prospective multicenter cohort. Patients & methods: Nine centers prospectively enrolled 138 UM patients clinically tested with the 15-GEP. Physician-recommended specialty referrals and metastatic surveillance regimens were collected. Results: A total of 93% of high-risk class 2 patients were referred to medical oncology for follow-up, compared with 51% of class 1 patients. A majority (62%) of class 2 patients were recommended overall high-intensity metastatic surveillance, while 85% of class 1 patients were recommended low-intensity metastatic surveillance. Conclusion: Treatment plan recommendations for UM patients are aligned with GEP-informed metastatic risk, consistent with prior studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document