OAB-015: Minimal residual disease following autologous stem cell transplant for myeloma patients in the Myeloma XI trial: prognostic significance and the impact of lenalidomide maintenance and molecular risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S10
Author(s):  
Ruth De Tute ◽  
Charlotte Pawlyn ◽  
David Cairns ◽  
Faith Davies ◽  
Andy Rawstron ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7547-7547
Author(s):  
Muhammad Husnain ◽  
Krishna Komanduri ◽  
Jeremy Ramdial ◽  
Lazaros J. Lekakis ◽  
Trent Peng Wang ◽  
...  

7547 Background: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (alloSCT) continues to be the optimal consolidation strategy for many patients with AML; cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities are known predictors of post-transplant outcomes. There is increasing evidence that Molecular Minimal Residual Disease (MMRD) following induction has important prognostic implications and its value in the prediction of post-transplant relapse continues to be elucidated. We aim to evaluate the impact of genetics and pre-transplant MMRD on clinical outcomes following alloSCT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated eighty-nine patients, ≥18 years with a diagnosis of AML in complete morphologic remission (i.e. < 5% BM blasts by morphologic assessment) who received alloSCT between 01/2012-05/2018 at the University of Miami and for whom cytogenetic and comprehensive molecular data was available prior to transplantation. Patients were stratified into favorable, intermediate and poor-risk categories based on 2017 ELN criteria. MMRD was defined as persistent leukemia-specific mutations prior to transplantation (i.e. NPM1, FLT3, CEBPA, IDH1-2, RUNX1 and TP53). Persistence of DTA mutations (DNMT3A, TET2 and ASXL1) was not considered MMRD, patients with unavailable cytogenetic/molecular data at diagnosis were excluded. Results: Seventy-four (83%) patients were transplanted in CR1, myeloablative conditioning was used in 72% of patients. Two-year OS and LFS were 69.4% and 78.2%, respectively. Stratification by ELN criteria resulted in prognostic separation for patients transplanted in CR1: 2-year OS for favorable (87%), intermediate (68%) and adverse risk (51%) patients (p = 0.0417). The presence of MMRD was the strongest predictor of post-transplant outcomes for the whole cohort with 2-year OS and LFS of 29.4% and 37.1% (HR 5.45 [95%CI 2.43-12.3] p = 0.0001; HR 12.4 [95%CI: 3.76 to 39.8] p = 0.0001); respectively. Subgroup analysis confirmed that MMRD was associated with significantly inferior LFS for IM/favorable and adverse risk patients (HR: 6.76 [95% CI 1.12 to 40.9], p = 0.038). Conclusions: Pre-transplant MMRD was the most important prognostic factor for relapse and survival in our cohort of AML patients undergoing alloSCT. Correlation of MMRD with other transplant variables such as conditioning intensity, MRD status by MFC and the impact of pre-emptive/therapeutic strategies in high-risk patients continues to be explored.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 816-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meir Wetzler ◽  
Dorothy Watson ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Kouros Owzar ◽  
Gregory Koval ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 816 We hypothesized that imatinib plus sequential chemotherapy would result in significant leukemia cell cytoreduction (molecular remission) in patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), allowing collection of normal hematopoietic stem cells uncontaminated by residual BCR/ABL+ lymphoblasts and thus reduce the likelihood of relapse after autologous (auto) stem cell transplant (SCT) for patients <60 years old without sibling donors. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study 10001 enrolled 58 patients who received 3–4 courses of imatinib (400 mg twice daily) plus sequential chemotherapy followed either by total body irradiation (TBI, 1320 cGy)/etoposide (60 mg/kg) and an allogeneic (allo) SCT from a matched sibling donor or by TBI/etoposide/cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) and auto-SCT. Fifteen had an allo-SCT on study using their matched sibling donor; others were transplanted off study using unrelated donors or received alternative therapy. Nineteen have undergone auto-SCT. Imatinib plus chemotherapy resulted in reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negative stem cells (complete molecular response, CMR) in 9 of the 19 patients; 4 remained minimally positive (major molecular response, MMR; <0.001) and 6 were not evaluable. RT-PCR status of the stem cell products had no effect on overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) after auto-SCT (CMR vs. MMR P=0.77 for DFS and P=0.50 for OS). We studied the effect of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection on outcome following auto-SCT. At day +120 post auto-SCT, DFS and OS were longer in patients who achieved at least a MMR (n=8) than patients who did not have a MMR (n=6) at that time point (P=0.045 and P=0.011; Panels A and B). After allo-SCT, 7 of 10 patients who survived >120 days had CMR; 2 additional patients achieved MMR, and 1 patient had residual MRD >0.001 (less than MMR); however, the sample size was too small to analyze the effect of MRD on outcome. After a median follow up time of 5.1 years, 9 (47%) of 19 auto-SCT patients and 7 of 15 (47%) of the allo-SCT patients remain alive in continuous CR. Ten of the transplanted patients have relapsed (8 following auto-SCT and 2 following allo-SCT); relapses occurred at a median of 5.9 months following auto-SCT. The DFS (median, 5.5 vs 4.1 years; P=0.84) and OS (median, 6.0 years vs. not reached at >6 years; P=0.90) were similar between those who underwent auto- or allo-SCT (Panels C and D). We conclude that patients who have MRD at levels lower than or equal to MMR following auto-SCT have prolonged survival and that auto-SCT represents a safe and effective alternative to allo-SCT for Ph+ ALL patients without sibling donors. The intergroup trial CALGB 10701 (Alliance) is now testing this strategy in Ph+ ALL patients >50 year old, using dasatinib as the BCR/ABL inhibitor. Figure: Disease-free (A, C) and overall (B, D) survival, stratified by minimal residual disease (MRD) at Day +120 and by transplant type. (A, B) MRD ≤0.001 (major molecular response) vs. >0.001 at day +120 for patients undergoing autologous-stem cell transplant (SCT); (C, D) allogeneic (allo) vs. autologous (auto) SCT. Figure:. Disease-free (A, C) and overall (B, D) survival, stratified by minimal residual disease (MRD) at Day +120 and by transplant type. (A, B) MRD ≤0.001 (major molecular response) vs. >0.001 at day +120 for patients undergoing autologous-stem cell transplant (SCT); (C, D) allogeneic (allo) vs. autologous (auto) SCT. Disclosures: Wetzler: BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Dasatinib is off label but in a clinical trial. 615A Oral Session 1 (3 abstracts) Acute promyelocytic leukemia 622A Oral Session 1 (3 abstracts) Autologous and Allogeneic Transplantatin CLL - Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy: Cell Signaling Leukemias - Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Chronic Lymphoid and Myeloid Leukemias 111. Hemoglobinopathies, excluding Thalassemia IV


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Olszewski ◽  
Pauline M. Chou ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Sarah Tallman ◽  
Morris Kletzel

An important measure to ensure successful follow-up in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplant is to evaluate for engraftment. Recent studies have shown that detecting minimal residual disease is important in order to predict early clinical relapse. We followed 88 leukemic patients with pre- and posttransplant Wilms tumor gene (WT1) levels to predict relapse and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) for engraftment. We have found that high pretransplant WT1 levels correlated significantly with relapse in all patient groups, but more significantly in the acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (ANLL) patients. Posttransplant WT1 level correlated with VNTR status such that low WT1 is associated invariably with VNTR of 100% donor origin, while high WT1 is associated with VNTR of 20%. The association is significant in all patients, specifically in ANLL patients. In this preliminary study, we demonstrate that patients harboring detectable levels of WT1 prior to stem cell transplant have a higher chance of relapse, and posttransplant WT1 and VNTR status appeared to be dependant parameters predicting relapse when present in the posttransplant period. By combining 2 highly sensitive molecular techniques, we have found that this combined technique provided us with a promising alternative for overcoming the limitations imposed by each separate procedure. More studies are necessary before we can come to any significant conclusions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document