scholarly journals Biomarkers to improve rational antibiotic use in low-resource settings

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e14-e15
Author(s):  
Kristina Keitel
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s356-s356
Author(s):  
Sukanta Chowdhury ◽  
Rajib Sarker ◽  
Md. Shafiqul Islam Khan ◽  
Probir Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Md. Abu Tareq ◽  
...  

Background: The inappropriate and irrational use of antibiotics both in humans and animals causes bacterial resistance. Bacterial resistance is common in low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh. Bangladesh has very limited information on antibiotic use and associated resistance. We sought to better understand antibiotic use in low-resource settings for the development of effective strategies to address inappropriate antibiotic use. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among hospitalized children <5 years of age in a tertiary-care hospital in Barishal, Bangladesh, to collect data on antibiotic use. We collected data from 400 children during February–April 2019. Results: Among these 400 children, >50% were aged <1 year, and >60% of these children were boys. The average hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1–14). Most of the children had history of diarrhea and 18% had pneumonia. Most children (82%) were prescribed antibiotics. A combined form of antibiotics was prescribed for 17% of these children. In total, 14 different antibiotics were used. The most commonly used antibiotic was ceftriaxone (57%) followed by azithromycin (14%). The parental route was mostly preferred (75%) for antibiotic administration. Conclusions: Antibiotic prescription was common in children aged <5 years visiting a tertiary-care hospital. Most of the prescribed antibiotics were broad spectrum, which can promote bacterial resistance. Further studies are needed to identify the factors associated with overuse of antibiotics and bacterial resistance in low-resource settings.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 079-083
Author(s):  
Lawrence Mbuagbaw ◽  
Francisca Monebenimp ◽  
Bolaji Obadeyi ◽  
Grace Bissohong ◽  
Marie-Thérèse Obama ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afework Kassu ◽  
Getnet Yimer ◽  
Solomon Benor ◽  
Kassahun Tesfaye ◽  
Yifokre Tefera ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Bingham ◽  
Amynah Janmohamed ◽  
Rosario Bartolini ◽  
Hilary M. Creed-Kanashiro ◽  
Yanuar Ruhweza Katahoire ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Victoria Abou-Khalil ◽  
Samar Helou ◽  
Eliane Khalifé ◽  
MeiRong Alice Chen ◽  
Rwitajit Majumdar ◽  
...  

We aim to identify the engagement strategies that higher education students, engaging in emergency online learning in low-resource settings, perceive to be effective. We conducted a sequential mixed-methods study based on Moore’s interaction framework for distance education. We administered a questionnaire to 313 students engaging in emergency online learning in low-resource settings to examine their perceptions of different engagement strategies. Our results showed that student–content engagement strategies, e.g., screen sharing, summaries, and class recordings, are perceived as the most effective, closely followed by student–teacher strategies, e.g., Q and A sessions and reminders. Student–student strategies, e.g., group chat and collaborative work, are perceived as the least effective. The perceived effectiveness of engagement strategies varies based on the students’ gender and technology access. To support instructors, instructional designers, and researchers, we propose a 10-level guide for engaging students during emergency online classes in low-resource settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document