Instream Rights and Watershed Governance

Riverflow ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 66-80
Keyword(s):  
Watershed Governance

scholarly journals Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6615
Author(s):  
Tri Sulistyaningsih ◽  
Achmad Nurmandi ◽  
Salahudin Salahudin ◽  
Ali Roziqin ◽  
Muhammad Kamil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Institutional Arrangement ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Institutional Control ◽  
Watershed Governance

This paper, which is focused on evaluating the policies and institutional control of the Brantas River Basin, East Java, Indonesia, aims to review government regulations on watershed governance in Indonesia. A qualitative approach to content analysis is used to explain and layout government regulations regarding planning, implementation, coordination, monitoring, evaluation, and accountability of the central and local governments in managing the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia. Nvivo 12 Plus software is used to map, analyze, and create data visualization to answer research questions. This study reveals that the management regulations of the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia, are based on a centralized system, which places the central government as an actor who plays an essential role in the formulation, implementation, and accountability of the Brantas watershed management. In contrast, East Java Province’s regional government only plays a role in implementing and evaluating policies. The central government previously formulated the Brantas watershed. This research contributes to strengthening the management and institutional arrangement of the central government and local governments that support the realization of good governance of the Brantas watershed. Future research needs to apply a survey research approach that focuses on evaluating the capacity of the central government and local governments in supporting good management of the Brantas watershed.

scholarly journals Collaborative governance and watershed management in biosphere reserves in Brazil and Canada

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Maria Inês Paes Ferreira ◽  
Pamela Shaw ◽  
Graham Kenneth Sakaki ◽  
Taylor Alexander ◽  
Jade Golzio Barqueta Donnini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Biosphere Reserves ◽  
Social Actors ◽  
Watershed Protection ◽  
Regulatory Frameworks ◽  
Watershed Governance ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Depth Interviews ◽  
Participatory Observation ◽  
Multiple Jurisdictions

Water management within vulnerable ecosystems managed by multiple jurisdictions can be very complex. This study compares regulatory environments and deconstructs the approaches used for watershed governance and environmental management inside two UNESCO’s Biosphere Reserves to identify possible transferability between the two management entities. Three methodological approaches were applied: participatory observation, in-depth interviews of key informants, and document research. We concluded that while there are differences between the regulatory frameworks and localized practices, at a foundational level the goals and desired outcomes relating to environmental protection are not dependent on location, but mainly on the integration and the establishment of common objectives among the diverse social actors involved in the management and from the interaction between different organisms of social control. Additionally, there are elements in the application of regulations and practices in both locales that could be transferred to other jurisdictions interested in addressing watershed protection in vulnerable ecosystems governed by multiple jurisdictions.

scholarly journals Comparing Complexity in Watershed Governance: The Case of California

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Ulibarri ◽  
Nataly Escobedo Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Watershed Scale ◽  
Institutional Reforms ◽  
Institutional Fit ◽  
Geographic Context ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Water Management Plans ◽  
Watershed Governance ◽  
Different Levels

Environmental governance scholars argue that optimal environmental performance can be achieved by matching the scale of governance to the scale of the resource being managed. In the case of water, this means managing at the scale of the watershed. However, many watersheds lack a single watershed-scale organization with authority over all water resources and instead rely on cross-jurisdiction coordination or collaboration among diverse organizations. To understand what “watershed governance” looks like fully, this paper maps organizations with rights to use, regulate, or manage water in four subwatersheds in California (the American, Cosumnes, and Kings Rivers in the Sacramento-San Joaquin watershed and the Shasta River in the Klamath watershed). We assemble datasets of water organizations, water rights holders, and water management plans and use content analysis and social network analysis to explore what water management looks like in the absence of a single basin authority. We describe the institutional complexity that exists in each watershed, compare the physical and institutional interconnections between actors in the watersheds, and then ask to what extent these connections map onto watershed boundaries. We find that the ways in which water management is complex takes very different forms across the four watersheds, despite their being located in a similar political, social, and geographic context. Each watershed has drastically different numbers of actors and uses a very different mix of water sources. We also see very different levels of coordination between actors in each watershed. Given these differences, we then discuss how the institutional reforms needed to create watershed-scale management are unique for each watershed. By building a stronger comparative understanding of what watershed governance actually entails, this work aims to build more thoughtful recommendations for building institutional fit.

Bidirectional connectivity in rivers and implications for watershed stability and management

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Human Impacts ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Ecological Resilience ◽  
Social Ecological Systems ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Watershed Governance ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Natural Scale ◽  
Future Management

River networks are connected in both upstream and downstream directions on large spatial scales by movement of water, materials, and animals. Here I examine the implications of these linkages for the stability, productivity, and management of watersheds and their migratory fishes. I use simple simulations of watershed alteration to illustrate that degradation can erode the productivity and stability of both upstream and downstream fisheries. Through analysis of an existing global dataset on rivers, I found that larger rivers tend to be more fragmented than smaller rivers. I offer three challenges and opportunities for the future management of watersheds. First, given that human impacts can spread up and down rivers, there is a need to align the scales of impact assessments with the natural scale of river systems. Second, free-flowing rivers naturally dampen variability; thus, the conservation of connectivity, habitat, and biodiversity represents a key opportunity to sustain the processes that confer stability. Third, watersheds represent natural units of social–ecological systems; watershed governance would facilitate reciprocal feedbacks between people and ecosystems and enable more social–ecological resilience.

Serious games as a catalyst for boundary crossing, collaboration and knowledge co-creation in a watershed governance context

2018 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 1010-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Jean ◽  
Wietske Medema ◽  
Jan Adamowski ◽  
Chengzi Chew ◽  
Patrick Delaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serious Games ◽  
Boundary Crossing ◽  
Watershed Governance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document