Public Interest in Private Law – Some Thoughts from a Civil Law Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 181-204
Author(s):  
Georg Kodek
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Josua Fernando ◽  
Susanti Adi Nugroho

AbstractThe Court Ruling claim that a debt discharge a bankruptcy inflict a debtor will loose his right to dominate the wealth which include the bankruptcy property. The whole riches of a debt who’s discharge bankruptcy, automatically will be placed to the general confiscation. The general confiscation of the debt property has intend to protect the interest of the creditor of all the deeds of the debt which can disserve the property of a bankruptcy and stop the execution of the debt property with all the creditors to get the debt repayment. The general confiscation itself is a form of confiscation which known in civil law regime especially bankruptcy in legal perspective as a private law.  Confiscation in a criminal case aim to prove criminal act. Article 38 of a Criminal Code Procedure regulate that the investigator can undertake the property of confiscation that placed in the general confiscation. However, Article 46 of a Bankruptcy and Suspension Of Obligation For payment Of  Debt regulate that all confiscation become vanished when the property has  confiscated in the general confiscation. When this two confiscation situated in the property, The confiscation in criminal case will precede the general confiscation. That matter is because of the confiscation in a criminal case is part of public law that aimed to protect our public interest.


Author(s):  
Robert Leckey

Through the narrow entry of property disputes between former cohabitants, this chapter aims to clarify thinking on issues crucial to philosophical examination of family law. It refracts big questions—such as what cohabitants should owe one another and the balance between choice and protection—through a legal lens of attention to institutional matters such as the roles of judges and legislatures. Canadian cases on unjust enrichment and English cases quantifying beneficial interests in a jointly owned home are examples. The chapter highlights limits on judicial law reform in the face of social change, both in substance and in the capacity to acknowledge the state's interest in intimate relationships. The chapter relativizes the focus on choice prominent in academic and policy discussions of cohabitation and highlights the character of family law, entwined with the general private law of property and obligations, as a regulatory system.


Author(s):  
Lionel Smith
Keyword(s):  

This chapter aims to answer the question, “what can the civil law tradition tell us about the New Private Law?” It seeks to do this by offering one civilian's perspective on private law, on U.S. private law, and on the New Private Law. In order to answer that question, it is necessary to say a little bit about what is a civilian perspective, or in other words, what makes a jurist a civilian. This is a question to which many different answers could be given. The chapter then looks at the different perspective that a civilian may have on what is the domain of private law. It also asks what insights the civilian's understanding of the discipline of law may offer to common lawyers. From a civilian perspective, the future of the New Private Law will be interesting indeed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-107
Author(s):  
M.D. TYAZHBIN

The article is dedicated to the category of subordination agreements. Based on the concept of conflict of rights in personam, the author makes an attempt to integrate this category into the system of private law, to determine the legal nature of subordination, and from these positions to assess the effectiveness of Art. 309.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, implemented in the course of the civil law reform.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-31
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat

Abstrak Hukum merupakan suatu sistem terpenting di dalam masyarakat untuk mengatur kehidupan yang berkaitan dengan sebuat tatanan yang selalu bergerak baik secara evolutif maupun revolusioner. Tatanan diatur dalam hukum itu sendiri meliputi tatanan transendetal, tatanan sosial/masyarakat dan tatanan politik. Hukum perdata yang merupakan ketentuan atau peraturan yang berkaitan dengan pribadi seseorang dengan orang lain, atau juga hukum sipil memiliki ruang lingkup yang luas dalam pengaturannya. Salah satu bidang hukum yang mengatur hubungan-hubungan antara individu-individu dalam masayrakat dengan sarana tertentu. Penggolongan dari hukum perdata yang ada saat ini antara lain meliputi: Hukum keluarga, Hukum harta kekayaan, Hukum kebendaan, Hukum perikatan, dan Hukum waris. Kajian kritis terhadap hukum perdata yang telah berlaku di Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode filsafat (filosofis), maka seharusya yang dijadikan dasar pemikirannya ialah falsafah Pancasila. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa Pancasila merupakan sumber dari segala sumber hukum negara Indonesia. Hal yang demikian ini dirasa sesuai mengingat falsafah Pancasila adalah merupakan ruh perjuangan dari para pejuang bangsa, sebagai alat pemersatu, dari yang sebelumnya terkotak-kotak oleh suatu daerah/wilayah, ras, suku, golongan dan agama. Kata Kunci: Hukum Perdata, Filosofis, Pancasila   Abstract The law is the most important system in society to regulate life in relation to an order that is always moving both evolutionarily and revolutionarily. Order is regulated in the law itself including transcendental order, social/community order and political order. Private law which is a provision or regulation relating to someone's personal with others, or also civil law has a broad scope in its regulation. One area of ​​law that regulates the relationships between individuals in society with certain means. The current classification of private law includes: Family law, Property law, Material law, Engagement law, and inheritance law. Critical study of private law that has prevailed in Indonesia using philoshopy (philosophical) methods, then the basis for thinking should be the philosophy of Pancasila. As is known that Pancasila is the source of all sources of Indonesian state law. This is considered appropriate given the philosophy of Pancasila is the spirit of the struggle of the nation's fighters, as a unifying tool, from previously divided by a region / region, race, ethnicity, class and religion. Keyword: Private Law, Philosophical, Pancasila.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (s2) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Artan Spahiu

Abstract The protection of the public interest is the main principle governing the activity regulation of the administrative bodies. This activity, traditionally, has been developed through administrative acts, as an expression of the unilateral and authoritarian willpower of public authority, which creates legal consequences. The administrative act has been and remains the most important instrument for the administration bodies to accomplish their mission, but it is no longer effective. Particularly this lack of efficiency is noticed in recent years when the development of the economy and the needs of the evergrowing society have prompted the administration to adapt its activity by making use of other mechanisms “borrowed” from private law. An important part of public activity can also be achieved through the contract as a way that brings the state closer to the private, mitigating its dominant position and leaving space for the efficiency of private activity to fulfil public engagements. Such contracts today are known as “administrative contracts” or “public contracts”. The terms mentioned above are instruments that establish legal relations, for the regulation of which the principle of public interest is opposed and competes with the principle of freedom of the contractual willpower. The regulation of these types of contracts is reached through the private law, which constitutes the general normative framework of contracts (lex generalis) even for the administrative contracts. But this general arrangement will have effect for as long as it does not contradict the imperative provisions of the specific act of public law (lex specialis), which regulates the administrative procedure for the completion of these contracts. This paper aims to bring to the spotlight the way our legislation predict and regulates administrative contracts, by emphasising particularly the features of their dualistic nature. The coexistence and competition of the principles of the freedom of contractual willpower and the protection of the public interest, evidenced in administrative contracts, is presented in this paper through the legal analysis of the Albanian legal framework which regulates these contracts. Under the terms when the role of the state in providing public services tends to increase and our legislation aims the harmonization in accord with the European legislation, it is necessary to improve the administrative contract regulation and extend its scope of action.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
V. V. Kulakov ◽  

The article deals with the problems associated with the differentiation of the limitation period and the time limit for applying to the court. The conclusion is made that it is impossible to attribute the limitation period to the preclusive period. The possibility of applying the limitation period to legal relations of different industry affiliation is analyzed. Based on the analysis of inter-industry relations of private law branches of law, the conclusion is made that it is impossible to use inter-industry analogy in the application of civil law norms on the limitation period to labor relations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document