P.033 Biopsy versus subtotal versus gross total resection in patients with low-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The role of extent of surgical resection (EOR) on clinical outcomes in patients with low-grade glioma requires further examination. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 1990 and January 5, 2018 on predefined patient outcomes regarding different EOR of low-grade glioma. Results: Our literature search yielded 60 studies including 13,289 patients. Pooled estimates of overall survival showed an increase from 3.79 years (95% CI, 2.37–5.22) in the biopsy group to 6.68 years (95% CI, 4.19–9.16) in STR to 10.65 years (95% CI, 6.78–14.52) in GTR. When compared to STR, GTR prolonged progression-free survival by 2.08 years (95% CI, 0.26–3.89; P=0.025). Pooled estimates of seizure control showed an improvement from 47.8% (95% CI, 26.7–69.6) with biopsy to 54.2% (95% CI, 48.7–59.6) with STR to 81.0% (95% CI, 74.6–86.2) with GTR. Compared to STR, GTR delayed malignant transformation (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.93; P=0.032), without increasing postoperative mortality (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.07–1.97; P=0.250) or morbidity (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.65–2.28; P=0.540). Conclusions: Among patients with low grade gliomas, higher degrees of safe EOR, were associated with longer overall and progression-free survival, better seizure control, and delayed malignant transformation, without increased mortality or morbidity.

Download Full-text

Management of low-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuro-Oncology Practice ◽

10.1093/nop/npy034 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 249-258 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Timothy J Brown ◽

Daniela A Bota ◽

Martin J van Den Bent ◽

Paul D Brown ◽

Elizabeth Maher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Low Grade Glioma ◽

World Health ◽

Subtotal Resection ◽

Low Grade ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Free Survival ◽

Low Grade Gliomas

Abstract Background Optimum management of low-grade gliomas remains controversial, and widespread practice variation exists. This evidence-based meta-analysis evaluates the association of extent of resection, radiation, and chemotherapy with mortality and progression-free survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients with low-grade glioma. Methods A quantitative systematic review was performed. Inclusion criteria included controlled trials of newly diagnosed low-grade (World Health Organization Grades I and II) gliomas in adults. Eligible studies were identified, assigned a level of evidence for every endpoint considered, and analyzed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The relative risk of mortality and of progression at 2, 5, and 10 years was calculated for patients undergoing resection (gross total, subtotal, or biopsy), radiation, or chemotherapy. Results Gross total resection was significantly associated with decreased mortality and likelihood of progression at all time points compared to subtotal resection. Early radiation was not associated with decreased mortality; however, progression-free survival was better at 5 years compared to patients receiving delayed or no radiation. Chemotherapy was associated with decreased mortality at 5 and 10 years in the high-quality literature. Progression-free survival was better at 5 and 10 years compared to patients who did not receive chemotherapy. In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IDH1) R132H mutations receiving chemotherapy, progression-free survival was better at 2 and 5 years than in patients with IDH1 wild-type gliomas. Conclusions Results from this review, the first to quantify differences in outcome associated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in patients with low-grade gliomas, can be used to inform evidence-based management and future clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Survival of Patients Treated with Antibiotics and Immunotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9051458 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 1458 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Fausto Petrelli ◽

Alessandro Iaculli ◽

Diego Signorelli ◽

Antonio Ghidini ◽

Lorenzo Dottorini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Free Survival ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Reporting Data

Antibiotics (ABs) are common medications used for treating infections. In cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concomitant exposure to ABs may impair the efficacy of ICIs and lead to a poorer outcome compared to AB non-users. We report here the results of a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of ABs on the outcome of patients with solid tumours treated with ICIs. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until September 2019 for observational or prospective studies reporting the prognoses of adult patients with cancer treated with ICIs and with or without ABs. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and an HR > 1 associated with a worse outcome in ABs users compared to AB non-users. Fifteen publications were retrieved for a total of 2363 patients. In the main analysis (n = 15 studies reporting data), OS was reduced in patients exposed to ABs before or during treatment with ICIs (HR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.51–2.84; p < 0.01). Similarly, PFS was inferior in AB users in n = 13 studies with data available (HR = 1.53, 95%CI 1.22–1.93; p < 0.01). In cancer patients treated with ICIs, AB use significantly reduced OS and PFS. Short duration/course of ABs may be considered in clinical situations in which they are strictly needed.

Download Full-text

Survival of Patients Treated with Antibiotics and Immunotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

10.20944/preprints202003.0425.v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Fausto Petrelli ◽

Alessandro Iaculli ◽

Diego Signorelli ◽

Antonio Ghidini ◽

Lorenzo Dottorini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Free Survival ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Reporting Data

Antibiotics (ABs) are common medications used for treating infections. In cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concomitant exposure to ABs may impair the efficacy of ICIs and lead to a poorer outcome compared to AB non-users. We report here the results of a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of ABs on the outcome of patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception until September 2019 for observational or prospective studies reporting prognosis of adult patients with cancer treated with ICIs and with or without ABs. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and an HR > 1 associated with a worse outcome in ABs users compared to no-ABs users. Fifteen publications were retrieved for a total of 2363 patients. In the main analysis (n = 15 studies reporting data), OS was reduced in patients exposed to ABs before or during treatment with ICIs (HR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.51–2.84; P<.01). Similarly, PFS was inferior in ABs users in n = 13 studies with data available (HR = 1.53, 95%CI 1.22–1.93; p<.01). In cancer patients treated with ICIs, AB use significantly reduces OS and PFS. Short duration/course of ABs may be considered in clinical situations in which they are strictly needed.

Download Full-text

Higher Tumor Mutation Burden Was a Predictor for Better Outcome for NSCLC Patients Treated with PD-1 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

SLAS TECHNOLOGY Translating Life Sciences Innovation ◽

10.1177/24726303211024557 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 247263032110245

Author(s):

Yuhui Zheng ◽

Meihong Yao ◽

Yinghong Yang

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Free Survival ◽

Tumor Mutation Burden ◽

Ovid Medline ◽

Mutation Burden ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Nsclc Patients

This study was conducted to evaluate the predictive efficacy of tumor mutation burden (TMB) in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving PD-1 antibodies. Embase, PubMed, Ovid Medline, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until May 24, 2020. The keywords included “PD-1,” “TMB,” and “NSCLC.” Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were summarized and combined using the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval. Twenty-one studies with 9883 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relapse rate ranged from 39.3% to 64.3% in the higher TMB group as compared with 0% to 40% in the lower TMB group. The median OS ranged from 2.9 to 23 mo in the higher TMB group as compared with 4.3 to 16.2 mo in the lower TMB group. Patients with a higher TMB had a better OS as compared with patients with a lower TMB (HR = 0.61, P < 0.001). Similarly, a higher TMB was also a good predictor of PFS in patients treated with PD1/PDL1 antibodies (HR = 0.55, P < 0.001). Our results suggest that among NSCLC patients receiving PD1/PDL1 antibodies, patients with higher TMB could have a better survival outcome.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Atypical Meningioma Patients: A Meta-Analysis Study

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.787962 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Dengpan Song ◽

Dingkang Xu ◽

Hongjie Han ◽

Qiang Gao ◽

Mingchu Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Subtotal Resection ◽

Free Survival ◽

Simpson Grade ◽

Atypical Meningiomas ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Grade Iii

Background and PurposeConsensus regarding the need for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in patients with atypical meningiomas (AMs) is lacking. We compared the effects of adjuvant RT after surgery, gross total resection (GTR), and subtotal resection (STR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with AMs, respectively.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 1, 2021, to identify articles comparing the PFS and OS of patients receiving postoperative RT after surgery, GTR and STR.ResultsWe identified 2307 unique studies; 24 articles including 3078 patients met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity analysis results showed that for patients undergoing undifferentiated surgical resection, adjuvant RT reduced tumor recurrence (HR=0.70, p<0.0001) with no significant effect on survival (HR=0.89, p=0.49). Postoperative RT significantly increased PFS (HR=0.69, p=0.01) and OS (HR=0.55, p=0.007) in patients undergoing GTR. The same improvement was observed in patients undergoing STR plus RT (PFS: HR=0.41, p<0.00001; OS: HR=0.47, p=0.01). A subgroup analysis of RT in patients undergoing GTR showed no change in PFS in patients undergoing Simpson grade I and II resection (HR=1.82, p=0.22) but significant improvement in patients undergoing Simpson grade III resection (HR=0.64, p=0.02).ConclusionRegardless of whether GTR or STR was performed, postoperative RT improved PFS and OS to varying degrees. Especially for patients undergoing Simpson grade III or IV resection, postoperative RT confers the benefits for recurrence and survival.

Download Full-text

A survival analysis of surgically treated incidental low-grade glioma patients

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-88023-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Lingcheng Zeng ◽

Qi Mei ◽

Hua Li ◽

Changshu Ke ◽

Jiasheng Yu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progression Free Survival ◽

Low Grade Glioma ◽

Low Grade ◽

Total Resection ◽

Surgical Timing ◽

Asymptomatic Group ◽

Free Survival ◽

Symptomatic Group ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Asymptomatic Phase

AbstractTo evaluate the surgical effect on survival in patients with incidental low-grade glioma (LGG) through comparison between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The medical records of surgically treated adult cerebral incidental LGG (iLGG) patients in our department between January 2008 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The survival of patients was calculated starting from the initial imaging diagnosis. Factors related to progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and malignant progression-free survival (MPFS) were statistically analyzed. Seventy-five iLGG patients underwent surgery: 49 in the asymptomatic group, who underwent surgery in the asymptomatic period, and 26 in the symptomatic group, who underwent surgery after the tumor had grown and the patients had developed tumor-related symptoms. Significantly more tumors were initially located adjacent to the functional area in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the total resection rate between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications (15.4%) and postoperative epilepsy (23.1%) was higher in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (4.1% and 10.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that surgical timing, namely, surgery performed before or after symptom occurrence, had no significant effect on PFS, OS or MPFS, while total resection significantly prolonged PFS, OS and MPFS, and the pathology of oligodendroglioma was positively correlated with PFS and OS (P < 0.05). Surgical timing for iLGGs should facilitate total resection. If total resection can be achieved, even after symptom occurrence, patients can achieve comparable survival benefits to those treated with surgery in the asymptomatic phase.

Download Full-text

Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Ovarian Research ◽

10.1186/s13048-021-00793-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Qingduo Kong ◽

Hongyi Wei ◽

Jing Zhang ◽

Yilin Li ◽

Yongjun Wang

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Early Stage ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Free Survival ◽

Review Manager ◽

Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

Download Full-text

P04.16 TP53 mutations in codon 273 is predictive of overall survival in astrocytoma patients

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noz126.111 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽

pp. iii32-iii32

Author(s):

H Noor ◽

R Rapkins ◽

K McDonald

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Tp53 Mutation ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Low Grade Glioma ◽

Low Grade ◽

Wild Type ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Free Survival ◽

Tp53 Mutations ◽

Fresh Frozen

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumour Protein 53 (TP53) is a tumour suppressor gene that is mutated in at least 50% of human malignancies. The prevalence of TP53 mutation is much higher in astrocytomas with reports of up to 75% TP53 mutant cases. Rare cases of TP53 mutation also exist in oligodendroglial tumours (10–13%). P53 pathway is therefore an important factor in low-grade glioma tumorigenesis. Although the prognostic impact of TP53 mutations has been studied previously, no concrete concordance were reached between the studies. In this study, we investigated the prognostic effects of TP53 mutation in astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort of 65 matched primary and recurrent fresh frozen tumours were sequenced to identify hotspot exons of TP53 mutation. Exons 1 to 10 were sequenced and pathogenic mutations were mostly predominant between Exons 4 and 8. The cohort was further expanded with 78 low grade glioma fresh frozen tissues and hotspot exons were sequenced. Selecting only the primary tumour from 65 matched tumours, a total of 50 Astrocytoma cases and 51 oligodendroglioma cases were analysed for prognostic effects of TP53. Only pathogenic TP53 mutations confirmed through COSMIC and NCBI databases were included in the over survival and progression-free survival analysis. RESULTS 62% (31/50) of astrocytomas and 16% (8/51) of oligodendrogliomas harboured pathogenic TP53 mutations. Pathogenic hotspot mutations in codon 273 (c.817 C>T and c.818 G>A) was prevalent in astrocytoma with 58% (18/31) of tumours with these mutations. TP53 mutation status was maintained between primary and recurrent tumours in 93% of cases. In astrocytoma, overall survival of TP53 mutant patients was longer compared to TP53 wild-type patients (p<0.01) but was not significant after adjusting for age, gender, grade and IDH1 mutation status. In contrast, astrocytoma patients with specific TP53 mutation in codon 273 showed significantly better survival compared to other TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type patients combined (p<0.01) in our multivariate analysis. Time to first recurrence (progression-free survival) of TP53 mutant patients was significantly longer than TP53 wild-type patients (p<0.01) after adjustments were made, while TP53 mutation in codon 273 was not prognostic for progression-free survival. In oligodendroglioma patients, TP53 mutations did not significantly affect overall survival and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION In agreement with others, TP53 mutation is more prevalent in Astrocytoma and mutations in codon 273 are significantly associated with longer survival.

Download Full-text

Effect of Statins on the Risk of Different Stages of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000518164 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Yun Li ◽

Xuan Cheng ◽

Jia-lian Zhu ◽

Wen-wen Luo ◽

Huai-rong Xiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Low Grade ◽

High Grade ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

The Relationship ◽

Comprehensive Literature Search

Introduction: The aim of this article was to investigate the relationship between statins and the risk of different stages or grades of prostate cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for articles published until December 18, 2020, on the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were then analyzed using the STATA.16.0 software. Results: A total of 588,055 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. We found that the use of statins expressed a significant correlation with a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73–0.91; RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75–0.99, respectively). However, no evidence suggested that the use of statins was beneficial for the prevention of localized prostate cancer incidence. Similarly, the pooled results also revealed no association between the use of statins and the risk of high-grade and low-grade prostate cancer. Conclusion: It has been found that the use of statins is associated with a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer but was not related to the risk of localized, low-grade, or high-grade prostate cancer.

Download Full-text

Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.52546.3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 ◽

pp. 423

Author(s):

Fausto Petrelli ◽

Antonio Ghidini ◽

Michele Ghidini ◽

Roberta Bukovec ◽

Francesca Trevisan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Modern Concept ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Published Data ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Personalized Approach ◽

The Cochrane Library

Background: The modern concept of oligometastatic (OM) state has been initially developed to describe patients with a low burden of disease and with a potential for cure with local ablative treatments. We systematically assessed the risk of death and relapse of oligometastatic (OM) cancers compared to cancers with more diffuse metastatic spread, through a meta-analysis of published data. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting prognosis of patients with OM solid tumors. Risk of death and relapse were extracted and pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI). The primary outcome of the study refers to overall mortality in OM vs. polymetastatic (PM) patients. Results. Mortality and relapse associated with OM state in patients with cancer were evaluated among 104,234 participants (n=173 studies). Progression-free survival was better in patients with OM disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.57–0.68; P <.001; n=69 studies). Also, OM cancers were associated with a better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68; P<.01; n=161 studies). In colorectal (CRC), breast, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the reduction in the risk of death for OM patients were 35, 38, 30 and 42%, respectively. Biliary tract and cervical cancer do not significantly better in OM stage likely for paucity of data. Conclusions. Patients with OM cancers have a significantly better prognosis than those with more widespread stage IV tumors. In OM cancer patients a personalized approach should be pursued.

Download Full-text