scholarly journals Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in Michigan Long-Term Care Facilities

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag N. Malani ◽  
Brenda M. Brennan ◽  
Curtis D. Collins ◽  
Jennie Finks ◽  
Jason M. Pogue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

scholarly journals The Impact of Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Support on Antibiotic Starts in Long-Term Care Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s527-s527
Author(s):  
Gabriela Andujar-Vazquez ◽  
Kirthana Beaulac ◽  
Shira Doron ◽  
David R Snydman
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Background: The Tufts Medical Center Antimicrobial Stewardship (ASP) Team has partnered with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) to provide broad-based educational programs (BBEP) to long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in an effort to improve ASP and infection control practices. LTCFs have consistently expressed interest in individualized and hands-on involvement by ASP experts, yet they lack resources. The goal of this study was to determine whether “enhanced” individualized guidance provided by an ASP expert would lead to antibiotic start decreases in LTCFs participating in our pilot study. Methods: A pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility and efficacy of providing enhanced ASP and infection control practices to LTCFs. In total, 10 facilities already participating in MDPH BBEP and submitting monthly antibiotic start data were enrolled, were stratified by bed size and presence of dementia unit, and were randomized 1:1 to the “enhanced” group (defined as reviewing protocols and antibiotic start cases, providing lectures and feedback to staff and answering questions) versus the “nonenhanced” group. Antibiotic start data were validated and collected prospectively from January 2018 to July 2019, and the interventions began in April 2019. Due to staff turnover and lack of engagement, intervention was not possible in 2 of the 5 LTCFs randomized to the enhanced group, which were therefore analyzed as a nonenhanced group. An incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were calculated comparing the antibiotic start rate per 1,000 resident days between periods in the pilot groups. Results: The average bed sizes for enhanced groups versus nonenhanced groups were 121 (±71.0) versus 108 (±32.8); the average resident days per facility per month were 3,415.7 (±2,131.2) versus 2,911.4 (±964.3). Comparatively, 3 facilities in the enhanced group had dementia unit versus 4 in the nonenhanced group. In the per protocol analysis, the antibiotic start rate in the enhanced group before versus after the intervention was 11.35 versus 9.41 starts per 1,000 resident days (IRR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.794–0.865). The antibiotic start rate in the nonenhanced group before versus after the intervention was 7.90 versus 8.23 antibiotic starts per 1,000 resident days (IRR, 1.048; 95% CI, 1.007–1.089). Physician hours required for ASP for the enhanced group totaled 8.9 (±2.2) per facility per month. Conclusions: Although the number of hours required for intervention by an expert was not onerous, maintaining engagement proved difficult and in 2 facilities could not be achieved. A statistically significant 20% decrease in the antibiotic start rate was achieved in the enhanced group after interventions, potentially reflecting the benefit of enhanced ASP support by an expert.Funding: This study was funded by the Leadership in Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Public Health (LEAP) fellowship training grant award from the CDC.Disclosures: None

scholarly journals 2044. An Assessment and Feedback Model Bringing Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Expertise to Long-Term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S687-S687
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Kate Tyner ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Teresa Micheels ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Background Long-term care facilities (LTCF) often struggle with implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) that meet all CDC core elements (CE). The CDC recommends partnership with infectious diseases (ID)/ASP experts to guide ASP implementation. The Nebraska Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment and Promotion Program (ASAP) is an initiative funded by NE DHHS via a CDC grant to assist healthcare facilities with ASP implementation. Methods ASAP performed on-site baseline evaluation of ASP in 5 LTCF (42–293 beds) in the spring of 2017 using a 64-item questionnaire based on CDC CE. After interviewing ASP members, ASAP provided prioritized facility-specific recommendations for ASP implementation. LTCF were periodically contacted in the next 12 months to provide implementation support and evaluate progress. The number of CE met, recommendations implemented, antibiotic starts (AS) and days of therapy (DOT)/1000 resident-days (RD), and incidence of facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infections (FO-CDI) were compared 6 to 12 months before and after on-site visits. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analyses. Results Multidisciplinary ASP existed in all 5 facilities at baseline with medical directors (n = 2) or directors of nursing (n = 3) designated as team leads. Median CE implemented increased from 3 at baseline to 6 at the end of follow-up (P = 0.06). No LTCF had all 7 CE at baseline. By the end of one year, 2 facilities implemented all 7 CE with the remaining implementing 6 CE. LTCF not meeting all CE were only deficient in reporting ASP metrics to providers and staff. Among the 38 recommendations provided by ASAP, 82% were partially or fully implemented. Mean AS/1000 RD reduced by 19% from 10.1 at baseline to 8.2 post-intervention (P = 0.37) and DOT/1000 RD decreased by 21% from 91.7 to 72.5 (P = 0.20). The average incidence of FO-CDI decreased by 75% from 0.53 to 0.13 cases/10,000 RD (P = 0.25). Conclusion Assessment of LTCF ASP along with feedback for improvement by ID/ASP experts resulted in more programs meeting all 7 CE. Favorable reductions in antimicrobial use and CDI rates were also observed. Moving forward, the availability of these services should be expanded to all LTCFs struggling with ASP implementation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 2055. Action: A Year in the Lives of Consultant Pharmacists Working on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long-Term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S692-S693
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Alex Neukirch ◽  
Rebecca J Ortmeier ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background The CDC recommends consultant pharmacists (CP) support antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities in long-term care facilities (LTCF) by reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness. We initiated a project training CP from a regional long-term care pharmacy to support AS implementation in LTCF. Methods CP were trained to evaluate the appropriateness of all systemic antimicrobial therapy (AT) and provide prescriber feedback during their monthly drug regimen review (DRR). An electronic database was developed to facilitate data reporting. Antimicrobial use (AU) and adverse events (AE) from 32 LTCF were analyzed for 2018 using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 5327 courses of AT with a median duration of 7 days (IQR 5–10) were reviewed. The majority of AT was started in the LTCF (55%) but was also initiated in hospitals (24%), clinics (11%) and emergency departments (2%). Of 2926 AT started in LTCF, 36% were based on nurse evaluation (NE) while 33% began after prescriber evaluation (PE). Fluoroquinolones (FQ) and first-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed agents (Table 1). Treatment or prophylaxis of urinary tract infections accounted for 40% of AU (Figure 1). Diagnostic testing was associated with 37% of AT courses. Urine cultures were the most frequent test performed (81%). Overall, 41% of AT was determined to be inappropriate resulting in > 800 feedback letters sent to prescribers. Unnecessary antibiotic starts (based on revised Mc Geer or Loeb’s criteria) were identified as the most common reason (Figure 2). AT appropriateness varied depending on the setting in which it was initiated. A majority (87%) of AT initiated in hospitals was found to be appropriate with 56% and 46% appropriate for ED and clinic starts. Appropriateness of LTCF initiated AT was 49% (59% after PE and 42% after NE). AE were associated with 3% of AT with allergic reactions and Clostridioides difficile infections occurring with 0.4% and 0.7% of AT, respectively. AE were most frequently associated with folate antagonists (5%) and FQ (3%). Conclusion This study demonstrates many AU improvement opportunities exist in LTCF and CP can play an important role in identifying them if trained in AS principles. CP should review all AU for appropriateness and provide data to inform AS efforts in LTCF. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Survey of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in Nebraska Long-Term Care Facilities

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 732-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Van Schooneveld ◽  
Hannah Miller ◽  
Harlan Sayles ◽  
Kristin Watkins ◽  
Philip W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control practices in long-term care facilities—Pennsylvania, 2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-716
Author(s):  
Nkuchia M. M’ikanatha ◽  
Sameh W. Boktor ◽  
Arlene Seid ◽  
Allen R Kunselman ◽  
Jennifer H. Han
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
And Control

AbstractIn 2017, we surveyed long-term care facilities in Pennsylvania regarding antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Among 244 responding facilities, 93% had IPC programs and 47% had antimicrobial stewardship programs. There was significant variation in practices across facilities, and a number of program implementation challenges were identified.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Call to Action

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 183.e1-183.e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley J. Morrill ◽  
Aisling R. Caffrey ◽  
Robin L.P. Jump ◽  
David Dosa ◽  
Kerry L. LaPlante
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Care Facilities

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Rhode Island Long-Term Care Facilities: Current Standings and Future Opportunities

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 979-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley J. Morrill ◽  
Leonard A. Mermel ◽  
Rosa R. Baier ◽  
Nicole Alexander-Scott ◽  
David Dosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rhode Island ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Infection Preventionists

Our survey of antimicrobial stewardship practices among Rhode Island long-term care facilities demonstrated opportunities to develop formal programs. Results suggest infection preventionists are largely responsible for ensuring appropriate antibiotic use in long-term care facilities and there is a need for increased interdisciplinary access to individuals with antimicrobial stewardship expertise.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:979–982

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document