scholarly journals Prevalence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) at a Tertiary-Care Center in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s494-s495
Author(s):  
Diane Heipel ◽  
Yvette Major ◽  
Carli Viola-Luqa ◽  
Michelle Elizabeth Doll ◽  
Michael Stevens ◽  
...  

Background: Quantification of the magnitude of CRE both within a facility and regionally poses a challenge to healthcare institutions. Periodic point-prevalence surveys are recommended by the CDC CRE tool kit as a facility-level prevention strategy. A 2016 point-prevalence survey of 2 high-risk units at a tertiary-care center in the United States for CRE colonization found that all patients surveyed were negative for CRE. The infection prevention (IP) team repeated the study in 2019 to reassess the prevalence of CRE in the healthcare facility. Methods: A point-prevalence survey was performed in November 2019 on the same 2 high-risk units surveyed in 2016. A perirectal flocked swab was collected from all patients unless a patient refused and/or a contraindication to rectal swab was present. Swabs were inoculated onto HardyChrom TM CRE agar for incubation in ambient air at 35°C for 24 hours. Organism identification was performed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry on a MBT Smart by Bruker. Results: None of the patients on either high-risk unit was known to be colonized or infected with CRE at the time of the point-prevalence survey. Of 41 perirectal swabs collected, 4 (9.8%) were positive for CRE. None (0 of 20) were surgical ICU patients and 4 of 21 (19%) were medical ICU patients. All positive swabs revealed different organisms identified as follows: Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter kobai, and Enterobacter aerogenes. All 4 positive patients had had recent contact with multiple acute-care hospitals. Also, 2 had been transferred for liver transplant evaluation. None of these patients had received a carbapenem during their admission to the facility. Conclusion: CRE are increasingly identified in healthcare centers in the United States. Centers previously classified as low prevalence will need to maintain preventive strategies to limit transmission risks as colonized patients arrive in the facility for care. Adoption of a robust horizontal infection prevention program may be an effective strategy to avoid the spread of CRE.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Michelle Doll reports a research grant from Molnlycke Healthcare.

2002 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Grohskopf ◽  
Ronda L. Sinkowitz-Cochran ◽  
Denise O. Garrett ◽  
Annette H. Sohn ◽  
Gail L. Levine ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Norihiro Yogo ◽  
Kristina L. Greenwood ◽  
Leslie Thompson ◽  
Pamela J. Wells ◽  
Stephen Munday ◽  
...  

Abstract Among 1,770 healthcare workers serving in high-risk care areas for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 39 (2.2%) were seropositive. Exposure to severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the community was associated with being seropositive. Job or unit type and percentage of time working with COVID-19 patients were not associated with positive antibody tests.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-204
Author(s):  
Raja Chakraverty ◽  
Kalyan Samanta

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global health issue. Resistance occurs when bacteria, parasites, viruses or fungi are exposed to antimicrobials but not killed by them. The study was conducted to gather baseline information to assess the antimicrobial consumption practices across six departments in a tertiary care super speciality hospital of West Bengal. Modified version of a patient data collection form proposed by Global PPS was developed on Epi Info software version 7 (CDC). Data of all patients in ward at 08.00 am data were studied. The use of antimicrobials was categorized as empiric, prophylactic or lab based. This classification is not mentioned in the files, so a response from the doctor taking care of the patient was noted.A total of 85 patient related data was collected in the designated survey form. Total beds covered was 340 and the number of patients on antimicrobials was found to be low at 21.27 %. The patients surveyed were predominantly female (78.8 %). The mean number of antimicrobials per patient was found to be 1.62 (range of 1.4 to 2.2) Relatively low number of patients were found to be on 2 or more antimicrobials. Double gram negative and Double anaerobic coverage of AM used varied across departments covered.:Our point prevalence study was able to facilitate conducting of point prevalence survey in high patient volume tertiary care hospital with paper based medical record system and also depicted the baseline parameters of intervention for instituting future action and policy changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1424-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaan N. Somani ◽  
Jason H. Kwah ◽  
Chen Yeh ◽  
David B. Conley ◽  
Leslie C. Grammer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1023-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Khosravi ◽  
Sophia Zhang ◽  
Alyce M. Anderson ◽  
Laura K. Ferris ◽  
Sonal Choudhary ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document