STOL—Some Possibilities and Limitations

1966 ◽  
Vol 70 (669) ◽  
pp. 825-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Mair

The Ninth Lanchester Memorial Lecture was given by Professor W. A. Mair, MA, FRAeS, on “STOL—Some Possibilities and Limitations” in the Society's Lecture Theatre on 12th May 1966. The Chair was taken by the President, Mr. A. D. Baxter, MEng, CEng, FRAeS. Before the lecture he presented the Society's Gold Medal for 1965 to Professor M. J. Lighthill, DSc, FRS, FRAeS, for “his outstanding original work in many fields of Aeronautics”, explaining that Professor Lighthill had been unable to be present at the Wilbur and Orville Wright Memorial Lecture in December 1965 when the Society's main awards for the year were presented.The President then said that this was the first meeting of the Society since his installation as President and it was a very pleasant way to start his year in office with first, the presentation of the Gold Medal to one distinguished scientist and second, the introduction of another as the Lanchester Memorial Lecturer.There would be many members of the Society who would remember Dr. Lanchester, his attendance at lectures and his contributions to the discussions. It was true, however, that the real stature of such men was rarely recognised at close quarters and often only in the light of later developments was the importance of their work realised. It was 20 years since Dr. Lanchester's death and their Memorial Lecture was in its ninth year. Each year, each President had added a tribute to this great man. He was a man of many parts—a scientist, musician, poet and engineer and aeronautics owed much to him. It was fitting that the Lecture had established a tradition of surveying some field of research associated with aerodynamics, in which Lanchester was so eminent. He thought that Lanchester would approve of both the subjects discussed and the distinguished men who had honoured his memory by presenting them. Before introducing Professor Mair he wished to welcome Mrs. Lanchester and Mr. George Lanchester and his wife, and Mrs. Mair.Professor Mair must be well known to most of them. After graduating in Mechanical Sciences at Cambridge in 1939 he had joined the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough, where he scent some six years in the Aerodynamics Department doing research on high subsonic speed, both in the wind tunnels and in full-scale flight. In 1946 he had gone to the University of Manchester as Director of the Fluid Motion Laboratory and since 1952 he had held the Francis Mond Chair of Aeronautical Engineering at Cambridge. His chief interest there had been mainly in low speed aerodynamics and his authority in that field was widely recognised. In 1963 he had been appointed Chairman of the Powered Lift Committee of the Aeronautical Research Council.

Author(s):  
A. R. Mackintosh

In 1907 Ernest Rutherford (later named ‘The Crocodile’ by Peter Kapitza), 36 years old and already a world–famous physicist, moved from McGill University in Montreal, Canada, to the University of Manchester, England. In the same year Niels Bohr (later known by some as ‘The Elephant’––he was one of the very few non–royal recipients of the Order of the Elephant), a 22–year–old student at the University of Copenhagen, received the gold medal of the Royal Danish Academy for his first research project, an experimental and theoretical study of water jets. During the next 30 years, until Rutherford's death in 1937, these two great scientists dominated quantum physics. Rutherford was the father of nuclear physics; together they founded atomic physics; and, with their students and colleagues, they were responsible for the great majority of the decisive advances made in the inter–war years. This lecture tells the story of the development in quantum physics, and makes some comparisons between Bohr and Rutherford–as men and scientists–drawing especially on their extensive correspondence between 1912 and 1937, the material that Bohr gathered in connection with the publication in 1961 of his Rutherford Memorial Lecture, the interviews that he gave just before his death in 1962, and other published and unpublished material from the Niels Bohr Archive in Copenhagen.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Stalker ◽  
E. Nicole Meyer

Richard E. Meyer was a mathematical physicist who specialized in the physics of fluid motion. His research career began with his doctorate at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, followed by a brief period of employment with the English Ministry of Aircraft Production. He then went to the University of Manchester, where he made his first major research contributions. In 1953 he left Manchester for the University of Sydney. By this time he was established as a theoretical supersonic aerodynamicist and he continued with this work as well as assuming the responsibilities of a research group leader. In 1957 he went to the USA and remained there for the rest of his life, essentially abandoning supersonic aerodynamics in favour of water-wave theory. His work was marked by an ability to analyse the approach to limiting conditions, or singularities, in models of physical processes. From the 1970s, he focused increasingly on developing the mathematical aspects of his work.


1993 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Correia

This lecture was given on 25 June 1993 at the College of Occupational Therapists' 18th Annual Conference, held at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.


2007 ◽  
Vol 111 (1122) ◽  
pp. 473-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. D. Ackroyd

This issue of the Aeronautical Journal celebrates the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the Honours Degree Course in Aeronautical Engineering at the Victoria University of Manchester. The following article therefore describes the aeronautical research and teaching activities of that university up to its recent amalgamation with the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST) to form the present-day University of Manchester. This juncture provides a further justification for recording the Victoria University’s achievements.Both the Victoria University and UMIST had their roots in the nineteenth century although, apart from the relatively brief period of the First World War, neither of them was particularly involved in aeronautics until after the Second World War. However, as Sections 6.0-10.0 seek to demonstrate, thereafter the Victoria University’s involvement became considerable. The preceding Sections describe the origins of the Victoria University and UMIST and, in the case of the former institution, the subsequent activities of its staff and graduates in engineering and mathematics which, although not always specifically aeronautical in content, nonetheless had a profound influence on the development of the aeronautical sciences.


1959 ◽  
Vol 63 (579) ◽  
pp. 135-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Keen

The 32nd Main Lecture of the Society to be given at a Branch Centre, “ Freighters—A General Survey “ by Mr. E. D. Keen, B.Sc., A.F.I.A.S., F.R.Ae.S., was held under the auspices of the Birmingham Branch on 4th December 1958.MR. F. F. CROCOMBE, F.R.Ae.S., President of the Birmingham Branch, opened the meeting by reminding those present that this was the second Main lecture to be held at the Birmingham Branch since its formation in 1944. The Branch had never been a large one and now numbered about 100 members drawn from local aviation enthusiasts and representatives of aircraft equipment and motor industry firms in the area. There was some longer-range support from Coventry and Wolverhampton but little from their own Birmingham University. Mr. Crocombe then welcomed the visitors, particularly the strong representation from Armstrong Whitworth and Blackburn and General Aircraft Ltd. He welcomed especially the President of the Society, Sir Arnold Hall, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.Ae.S. who would preside over the rest of the proceedings.After thanking the Birmingham Branch for their hospitality, SIR ARNOLD HALL, said that the holding of Main lectures at Branches had proved to be extremely popular and the practice should certainly be continued with enthusiasm. Introducing the lecturer, the President said that Mr. Keen had been a leading member of the Branch for a long time and was at present its Vice-President. Educated at the Regent Street Polytechnic, where he took a degree of the University of London, Mr. Keen had joined Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft Ltd. in 1928 and had been with the Company ever since. He became Assistant Chief Designer in 1949 and since 1955 he had been Chief Designer. In 1955 the Society had awarded him the Simms Gold Medal for a classical paper on “ Integral Construction.” His subject now was “ Freighters,” which was a part of aeronautical engineering that he had made particularly his own, first by study and later by putting his ideas into practice.


It is just fifty years since Rutherford took up his appointment as Langworthy Professor of Physics at the University of Manchester and there established the school of research which was to be so fruitful in great discoveries. It is less than iffy years since he first put forward the nuclear scheme of the structure of the atom. The spirit, the scale, the structure and, above all, the organization and [administration of research in physics has changed so much in these fifty years that the discoveries in question may truly be said to belong to another age, an age so remote as to seem closer to the times of Goethe and of Beethoven than to those of T. S. Eliot and of William Walton. It appeared to me possible that the aspiring young, among whom are numbered the Rutherfords of the future, might be interested to consider certain notable doings of that distant age, while they can still dear of them from one who was himself young at the time in question. I have therefore taken as my theme, for the Rutherford Memorial Lecture, the birth of the nuclear atom, which dominates so much of the physics of today. And, as, in dealing with any notable birth, it is usual and proper to say something about ancestry, I shall begin with those early speculations on the structure of the atom which led up to the conception of Rutherford's model.


1966 ◽  
Vol 70 (667) ◽  
pp. 687-694
Author(s):  
William Hildred

The Fourth Handley Page Memorial Lecture, “Were the Wrights Wrong?”, was given by Sir William Hildred, OBE, CB, MA, Honorary Companion of the Society, Director Emeritus of the International Air Transport Association, in the Society's Lecture Theatre on 19th May 1966. Opening the meeting the President, Mr. A. D. Baxter, MEng, CEng, FRAeS, reminded the audience that the Handley Page Memorial Lecture was arranged jointly by the Cranfield Society and the Royal Aeronautical Society. Both Societies had much reason to honour the name of Sir Frederick Handley Page and the arrangements by which they alternated in providing both venue and the lecturer had proved a happy one.On this occasion the Royal Aeronautical Society was glad to welcome its friends from the Cranfield Society and other guests and visitors, particularly Lady Hildred. “HP’s” early reputation was built on the practical application of aerodynamic flow, but it had extended far and wide and to many fields beyond aerodynamics and even beyond aeronautics. He thought it was in this spirit of his wider service to mankind that they paid tribute that night. Certainly he felt that was the approach their lecturer had taken.Sir William Hildred was well known to most people through his long and valued service to the International Air Transport Association. On completion of his studies at the University of Sheffield in 1914, he joined the Army and served for the duration of the 1914-18 War. In 1919 he had started his Civil Service career in the Treasury, becoming a Finance Officer, then Head of a Branch of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and later a Deputy General Manager of the Exports Guarantee Department. In 1938 he had begun his long association with civil aviation as Deputy Director General of Civil Aviation at the Air Ministry, becoming Director General in 1941. In 1946 he had joined IATA as Director General, where he had done such magnificent work ever since until his retirement only a month ago. He had received many honours, including Grand Officer of the Order of Nassau, Commander of the Order of the Crown of Belgium and, not least they hoped, Honorary Companionship of the Royal Aeronautical Society.


1961 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  

Geoffrey Jefferson was born in County Durham on 10 April 1886, the son of Dr A. J. Jefferson, a well-known surgeon and general practitioner in Rochdale, Lancashire. His great-grandfather had served in the Royal Navy, being entered as midshipman to Captain Bligh, later of Bounty. He was educated at Manchester Grammar School, and thereafter in the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Manchester. He graduated M.B., B.S. (London) in 1909, proceeding to the Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1911 and to the M.S.(London) with gold medal in 1913. For a time he was demonstrator of anatomy to Professor Elliott Smith. While in the last-named post, Jefferson made some contributions to the study of the cerebral sulci, and it was this introduction to the nervous system that stimulated his lifelong interest in this system, as anatomist, physiologist and surgeon. In 1914, Jefferson, having married a former fellow-student, Dr Gertrude Flumerfelt, herself to become a psychiatric physician of parts, decided to move to Vancouver, British Columbia, his wife’s childhood home, in the hope of opportunities of a surgical career. The pathway to opportunity, then, and still largely today, for an able and ambitious young physician or surgeon was appointment to the staff of an undergraduate teaching hospital. Denied it by lack of vacancies at the relevant time, young medical graduates, now as then, migrate across the Atlantic and promising men are lost to us. But the first world war broke out shortly after the Jeffersons’ departure, and they speedily returned, Jefferson to join the staff of the Anglo-Russian Hospital organized by Sir Herbert Waterhouse. After some service in Russia, Jefferson went to France and with the 14th General Hospital began, under the hard conditions of the war, to gain his immense experience of the results of injury and infection of the brain, and of the narrow limits within which they could then be treated, at a time when the sulphonamides, the antibiotics and blood transfusions could not be called in aid and bacterial infection dominated the surgical scene.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Rodger

This article is the revised text of the first W A Wilson Memorial Lecture, given in the Playfair Library, Old College, in the University of Edinburgh, on 17 May 1995. It considers various visions of Scots law as a whole, arguing that it is now a system based as much upon case law and precedent as upon principle, and that its departure from the Civilian tradition in the nineteenth century was part of a general European trend. An additional factor shaping the attitudes of Scots lawyers from the later nineteenth century on was a tendency to see themselves as part of a larger Englishspeaking family of lawyers within the British Empire and the United States of America.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document