An evaluation of the validity of nutrition screening and assessment tools in patients admitted to a vascular surgery unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolene Thomas ◽  
Billingsley Kaambwa ◽  
Christopher Delaney ◽  
Michelle Miller
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nrs 2002

AbstractVascular surgery patients are nutritionally vulnerable. Various malnutrition screening and assessment tools are available; however, none has been developed or validated in vascular patients. The present study aimed to: (1) investigate the validity of four commonly administered malnutrition screening tools (Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutrition Risk Screen-2002 (NRS-2002) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF) and an assessment tool (the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA)) compared against a comprehensive dietitian’s assessment and (2) evaluate the ability of the instruments to predict outcomes. Vascular inpatients were screened using the four malnutrition screening tools and assessed using the PG-SGA. Each was assessed by a dietitian incorporating nutritional biochemistry, anthropometry and changes in dietary intake. Diagnostic accuracy, consistency and predictive ability were determined. A total of 322 (69·3 % male) patients participated, with 75 % having at least one parameter indicating nutritional deficits. No instrument achieved the a priori levels for sensitivity (14·9–52·5 %). Neither tool predicted EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level score. All tools except the MNA-SF were associated with length of stay (LOS); however, the direction varied with increased risk of malnutrition on the MUST and NRS-2002 being associated with shorter LOS (P=0·029 and 0·045) and the reverse with the MST and PG-SGA (P=0·005 and <0·001). The NRS-2002 was associated with increased risk of complications (P=0·039). The MST, NRS-2002 and PG-SGA were predictive of discharge to an institution (P=0·004, 0·005 and 0·003). The tools studied were unable to identify the high prevalence of undernutrition; hence, vascular disease-specific screening and/or assessment tools are warranted.

scholarly journals Comparing Assessment Tools as Candidates for Personalized Nutritional Evaluation of Senior Citizens in a Nursing Home

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4160
Author(s):  
Diogo Sousa-Catita ◽  
Maria Alexandra Bernardo ◽  
Carla Adriana Santos ◽  
Maria Leonor Silva ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Nursing Home Setting

Nutrition is an important health issue for seniors. In nursing homes, simple, inexpensive, fast, and validated tools to assess nutritional risk/status are indispensable. A multisurvey cross-sectional study with a convenient sample was created, comparing five nutritional screening/assessment tools and the time required for each, in order to identify the most useful instrument for a nursing home setting. Nutrition risk/status was evaluated using the following tools: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and calf girth (CG). The time spent completing each tool was recorded. Eighty-three subjects were included. MNA-SF and CG were the screening tools that ranked highest with regards to malnutrition identification. CG failed to identify nutritional risk/malnutrition in seniors with lower limb edema. CG was the fastest tool while SGA was the slowest. This was the first study comparing non-invasive nutritional tools with time expended as a consideration in the implementation. CG is responsive, fast, and reliable in elders without edema. MNA-SF was more efficient at detecting malnutrition cases in the elderly population. Both MNA-SF and CG are considered the most suitable for the nursing home setting.

scholarly journals Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Parasite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Zhan Wang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ge Song ◽  
MingQuan Pang ◽  
Bin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002

Background: Echinococcosis is a chronic consumptive liver disease. Little research has been carried out on the nutritional status of infected patients, though liver diseases are often associated with malnutrition. Our study investigated four different nutrition screening tools, to assess nutritional risks of hospitalized patients with echinococcosis. Methods: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) were used to assess 164 patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and 232 with cystic echinococcosis (CE). Results were then compared with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Results: According to ESPEN standards for malnutrition diagnosis, 29.2% of CE patients and 31.1% of AE patients were malnourished. The malnutrition risk rates for CE and AE patients were as follows: NRS 2002 – 40.3% and 30.7%; MUST – 51.5% and 50.9%; MNA-SF – 46.8% and 44.1%; and NRI – 51.1% and 67.4%. In patients with CE, MNA-SF and NRS 2002 results correlated well with ESPEN results (k = 0.515, 0.496). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of MNA-SF and NRS 2002 were 0.803 and 0.776, respectively. For patients with AE, NRS 2002 and MNA-SF results correlated well with ESPEN (k = 0.555, 0.493). AUC values of NRS 2002 and MNA-SF were 0.776 and 0.792, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze hospitalized echinococcosis patients based on these nutritional screening tools. Our results suggest that NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are suitable tools for nutritional screening of inpatients with echinococcosis.

scholarly journals A comparison of the MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS-2002 nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun-Wen Hsueh ◽  
Cheng-Chou Lai ◽  
Chia-Yen Hung ◽  
Yu-Ching Lin ◽  
Chang-Hsien Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Nrs 2002

Abstract Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) treatment incompletion is a known negative prognosticator for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Malnutrition is a common phenomenon which leads to treatment interruption in patients with HNC. We aimed to compare the performance of three nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion in patients with HNC undergoing definitive CCRT. Material and methods Three nutritional assessment tools, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutritional Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), were prospectively assessed prior to CCRT for HNC patients. Patients were stratified into either normal nutrition or malnourished groups using different nutrition tools. Treatment incompletion and treatment-related toxicities associated with CCRT were recorded. Results A total of 461 patients were included in the study; malnourished rates ranged from 31.0–51.0%. The CCRT incompletion rates were 4.9–6.3% and 14.5–18.2% for normal nutrition patients and malnourished patients, respectively. The tools had significant correlations with each other (Pearson correlation 0.801–0.837, p < 0.001 for all) and accurately predicted the incompletion of CCRT. MNA-SF had the highest performance in predicting treatment-related toxicity, including emergency room visits, need for hospitalization, any grade III or higher hematological adverse events, and critical body weight loss, compared to the other tools. Conclusions MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS2002 were all shown to be competent tools for malnutrition recognition and prediction of treatment incompletion, as well as treatment-related toxicity, in HNC patients undergoing CCRT. We suggest implementing nutritional assessment prior to treatment to improve the rate of treatment completion and to reduce treatment-related toxicity in HNC patients.

scholarly journals Validation of Malnutrition Screening Tools in Liver Cirrhosis

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Traub ◽  
Ina Bergheim ◽  
Angela Horvath ◽  
Vanessa Stadlbauer
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Validity Criteria ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Malnutrition in liver cirrhosis is frequently underestimated. To determine if a patient is at risk of malnutrition, several screening tools have been established. However, most of them are not validated for patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, we compared the RFH-NPT (Royal Free Hospital Nutritional Prioritizing Tool) as the validated gold standard for malnutrition screening in cirrhosis patients with GMS (Graz Malnutrition Screening), NRS-2002 (Nutritional Risk Screening) and MNA-SF (Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form). Based on common validity criteria for screening tools, only the MNA-SF showed fair correlation (12/15 points) with the RFH-NPT, whereas NRS-2002 and GMS performed worse (6/15 points). Taken together, our results suggest that NRS-2002 and GMS are not suitable for screening of malnutrition in cirrhosis patients. A cirrhosis-specific screening tool like RFH-NPT should be used to assess malnutrition and to identify those at risk of malnutrition.

Prospective validation of a novel geriatric screening tool, the Korean cancer study group geriatric score (KG)-7, in older patients with advanced cancer undergoing 1st line palliative chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21540-e21540
Author(s):  
Jin Won Kim ◽  
Se Hyun Kim ◽  
Yun-Gyoo Lee ◽  
In Gyu Hwang ◽  
Hong-Suk Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Cancer Study ◽  
Cancer Study Group ◽  
Geriatric Screening

e21540 Background: Full geriatric assessment is time-consuming and labor intensive, and most screening tools were developed in Western countries, which cannot reflect differences in some domains such as nutrition deficit, in Asians. Methods: This prospective study to validate a novel geriatric screening tool, the Korean Cancer Study Group Geriatric Score (KG)-7, was conducted as a substudy of a multicenter study for the prediction tool of toxicity in older cancer patients receiving 1st line chemotherapy (KCSG PC13-09). Abnormal GA was defined as deficits in at least 2 out of 6 domains [activities of daily living (ADL), Korean-instrument ADL (K-IADL), Mini-Mental Status Examination in the Korean version of the Consortium (MMSE-KC), Short-Form Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Timed Get Up and Go test (TGUG)]. KG-7 questionnaire was answered before full GA. We compared the performance of KG-7 with G-8 score, obtained from MNA, by calculating AUC of accuracy, and also sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV). Results: Baseline GA and KG-7 results of 301 patients were collected. Median age was 75 years old (range 70-93). Eighty six (28.6%) and 124 patients (41.2%) showed dependent ADL and IADL, respectively. Impairment for domains of MMSE, SGDS, MNA, and TGUG was identified in 166 (55.1%), 132 (43.9%), 230 (76.4%), and 52 patients (17.3%), respectively. Abnormal GA was documented in 221 patients (73.4%). Based on the ≤ 5 cut-off value of KG-7 for abnormal GA, the AUC was 0.741 (95% CI, 0.683-0.800), and the SE, SP, PPV, and NPV were 75.6%, 58.7%, 84.3%, and 44.9%, respectively. Abnormal KG-7 score was shown in 198 patients (66.9%). With the ≤ 14 cut-off value of G-8 for abnormal GA, the G-8 showed a SE, SP, PPV, and NPV of 93.6%, 28.0%, 79.2%, and 60.0% with AUC of 0.766 (95% CI, 0.703-0.829). Abnormal G-8 score was shown in 260 patients (88.1%). Conclusions: KG-7 could identify patients with abnormal GA with comparable performance with G-8 and can be a useful screening tool for Asian countries with limited resources and high patient volume.

scholarly journals Malnutrition in older adults: screening and determinants

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare A. Corish ◽  
Laura A. Bardon
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Residential Care ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Protein Energy Malnutrition ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Climbing Stairs

Older adults are at risk of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). PEM detrimentally impacts on health, cognitive and physical functioning and quality of life. Given these negative health outcomes in the context of an ageing global population, the Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life Joint Programming Initiative Malnutrition in the Elderly (MaNuEL) sought to create a knowledge hub on malnutrition in older adults. This review summarises the findings related to the screening and determinants of malnutrition. Based on a scoring system that incorporated validity, parameters used and practicability, recommendations on setting-specific screening tools for use with older adults were made. These are: DETERMINE your health checklist for the community, Nutritional Form for the Elderly for rehabilitation, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire-Residential Care for residential care and Malnutrition Screening Tool or Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form for hospitals. A meta-analysis was conducted on six longitudinal studies from MaNuEL partner countries to identify the determinants of malnutrition. Increasing age, unmarried/separated/divorced status (vs.married but not widowed), difficulties walking 100 m or climbing stairs and hospitalisation in the year prior to baseline or during follow-up predicted malnutrition. The sex-specific predictors of malnutrition were explored within The Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing dataset. For females, cognitive impairment or receiving social support predicted malnutrition. The predictors for males were falling in the previous 2 years, hospitalisation in the past year and self-reported difficulties in climbing stairs. Incorporation of these findings into public health policy and clinical practice would support the early identification and management of malnutrition.

Mini nutritional assessment test long and short form are valid screening tools in Turkish older adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Sarikaya ◽  
Meltem Halil ◽  
Mehmet Emin Kuyumcu ◽  
Mustafa Kemal Kilic ◽  
Yusuf Yesil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Screening Tools

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effectiveness of eight screening tools in detecting risk of malnutrition in cirrhotic patients: the KIRRHOS study

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 1368-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Georgiou ◽  
Georgios V. Papatheodoridis ◽  
Alexandra Alexopoulou ◽  
Melanie Deutsch ◽  
Ioannis Vlachogiannakos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

AbstractMalnutrition risk screening in cirrhotic patients is crucial, as poor nutritional status negatively affects disease prognosis and survival. Given that a variety of malnutrition screening tools is usually used in routine clinical practice, the effectiveness of eight screening tools in detecting malnutrition risk in cirrhotic patients was sought. A total of 170 patients (57·1 % male, 59·4 (sd 10·5) years, 50·6 % decompensated ones) with cirrhosis of various aetiologies were enrolled. Nutritional screening was performed using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Index, Malnutrition Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Birmingham Nutritional Risk Score, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Royal Free Hospital Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) and Liver Disease Undernutrition Screening Tool (LDUST). Malnutrition diagnosis was defined using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Data on 1-year survival were available for 145 patients. The prevalence of malnutrition risk varied according to the screening tools used, with a range of 13·5–54·1 %. RFH-NPT and LDUST were the most accurate in detecting malnutrition (AUC = 0·885 and 0·892, respectively) with a high sensitivity (97·4 and 94·9 %, respectively) and fair specificity (73·3 and 58 %, respectively). Malnutrition according to SGA was an independent prognostic factor of within 1-year mortality (relative risk was 2·17 (95 % CI 1·0, 4·7), P = 0·049) after adjustment for sex, age, disease aetiology and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, whereas nutrition risk according to RFH-NPT, LDUST and NRS-2002 showed no association. RFH-NPT and LDUST were the only screening tools that proved to be accurate in detecting malnutrition in cirrhotic patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document