scholarly journals Comparing Assessment Tools as Candidates for Personalized Nutritional Evaluation of Senior Citizens in a Nursing Home

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4160
Author(s):  
Diogo Sousa-Catita ◽  
Maria Alexandra Bernardo ◽  
Carla Adriana Santos ◽  
Maria Leonor Silva ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Nursing Home Setting

Nutrition is an important health issue for seniors. In nursing homes, simple, inexpensive, fast, and validated tools to assess nutritional risk/status are indispensable. A multisurvey cross-sectional study with a convenient sample was created, comparing five nutritional screening/assessment tools and the time required for each, in order to identify the most useful instrument for a nursing home setting. Nutrition risk/status was evaluated using the following tools: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and calf girth (CG). The time spent completing each tool was recorded. Eighty-three subjects were included. MNA-SF and CG were the screening tools that ranked highest with regards to malnutrition identification. CG failed to identify nutritional risk/malnutrition in seniors with lower limb edema. CG was the fastest tool while SGA was the slowest. This was the first study comparing non-invasive nutritional tools with time expended as a consideration in the implementation. CG is responsive, fast, and reliable in elders without edema. MNA-SF was more efficient at detecting malnutrition cases in the elderly population. Both MNA-SF and CG are considered the most suitable for the nursing home setting.

scholarly journals Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Parasite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Zhan Wang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ge Song ◽  
MingQuan Pang ◽  
Bin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002

Background: Echinococcosis is a chronic consumptive liver disease. Little research has been carried out on the nutritional status of infected patients, though liver diseases are often associated with malnutrition. Our study investigated four different nutrition screening tools, to assess nutritional risks of hospitalized patients with echinococcosis. Methods: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) were used to assess 164 patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and 232 with cystic echinococcosis (CE). Results were then compared with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Results: According to ESPEN standards for malnutrition diagnosis, 29.2% of CE patients and 31.1% of AE patients were malnourished. The malnutrition risk rates for CE and AE patients were as follows: NRS 2002 – 40.3% and 30.7%; MUST – 51.5% and 50.9%; MNA-SF – 46.8% and 44.1%; and NRI – 51.1% and 67.4%. In patients with CE, MNA-SF and NRS 2002 results correlated well with ESPEN results (k = 0.515, 0.496). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of MNA-SF and NRS 2002 were 0.803 and 0.776, respectively. For patients with AE, NRS 2002 and MNA-SF results correlated well with ESPEN (k = 0.555, 0.493). AUC values of NRS 2002 and MNA-SF were 0.776 and 0.792, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze hospitalized echinococcosis patients based on these nutritional screening tools. Our results suggest that NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are suitable tools for nutritional screening of inpatients with echinococcosis.

scholarly journals Validation of Malnutrition Screening Tools in Liver Cirrhosis

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Traub ◽  
Ina Bergheim ◽  
Angela Horvath ◽  
Vanessa Stadlbauer
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Validity Criteria ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Malnutrition in liver cirrhosis is frequently underestimated. To determine if a patient is at risk of malnutrition, several screening tools have been established. However, most of them are not validated for patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, we compared the RFH-NPT (Royal Free Hospital Nutritional Prioritizing Tool) as the validated gold standard for malnutrition screening in cirrhosis patients with GMS (Graz Malnutrition Screening), NRS-2002 (Nutritional Risk Screening) and MNA-SF (Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form). Based on common validity criteria for screening tools, only the MNA-SF showed fair correlation (12/15 points) with the RFH-NPT, whereas NRS-2002 and GMS performed worse (6/15 points). Taken together, our results suggest that NRS-2002 and GMS are not suitable for screening of malnutrition in cirrhosis patients. A cirrhosis-specific screening tool like RFH-NPT should be used to assess malnutrition and to identify those at risk of malnutrition.

An evaluation of the validity of nutrition screening and assessment tools in patients admitted to a vascular surgery unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolene Thomas ◽  
Billingsley Kaambwa ◽  
Christopher Delaney ◽  
Michelle Miller
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nrs 2002

AbstractVascular surgery patients are nutritionally vulnerable. Various malnutrition screening and assessment tools are available; however, none has been developed or validated in vascular patients. The present study aimed to: (1) investigate the validity of four commonly administered malnutrition screening tools (Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutrition Risk Screen-2002 (NRS-2002) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF) and an assessment tool (the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA)) compared against a comprehensive dietitian’s assessment and (2) evaluate the ability of the instruments to predict outcomes. Vascular inpatients were screened using the four malnutrition screening tools and assessed using the PG-SGA. Each was assessed by a dietitian incorporating nutritional biochemistry, anthropometry and changes in dietary intake. Diagnostic accuracy, consistency and predictive ability were determined. A total of 322 (69·3 % male) patients participated, with 75 % having at least one parameter indicating nutritional deficits. No instrument achieved the a priori levels for sensitivity (14·9–52·5 %). Neither tool predicted EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level score. All tools except the MNA-SF were associated with length of stay (LOS); however, the direction varied with increased risk of malnutrition on the MUST and NRS-2002 being associated with shorter LOS (P=0·029 and 0·045) and the reverse with the MST and PG-SGA (P=0·005 and <0·001). The NRS-2002 was associated with increased risk of complications (P=0·039). The MST, NRS-2002 and PG-SGA were predictive of discharge to an institution (P=0·004, 0·005 and 0·003). The tools studied were unable to identify the high prevalence of undernutrition; hence, vascular disease-specific screening and/or assessment tools are warranted.

scholarly journals Malnutrition in older adults: screening and determinants

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare A. Corish ◽  
Laura A. Bardon
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Residential Care ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Protein Energy Malnutrition ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Climbing Stairs

Older adults are at risk of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). PEM detrimentally impacts on health, cognitive and physical functioning and quality of life. Given these negative health outcomes in the context of an ageing global population, the Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life Joint Programming Initiative Malnutrition in the Elderly (MaNuEL) sought to create a knowledge hub on malnutrition in older adults. This review summarises the findings related to the screening and determinants of malnutrition. Based on a scoring system that incorporated validity, parameters used and practicability, recommendations on setting-specific screening tools for use with older adults were made. These are: DETERMINE your health checklist for the community, Nutritional Form for the Elderly for rehabilitation, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire-Residential Care for residential care and Malnutrition Screening Tool or Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form for hospitals. A meta-analysis was conducted on six longitudinal studies from MaNuEL partner countries to identify the determinants of malnutrition. Increasing age, unmarried/separated/divorced status (vs.married but not widowed), difficulties walking 100 m or climbing stairs and hospitalisation in the year prior to baseline or during follow-up predicted malnutrition. The sex-specific predictors of malnutrition were explored within The Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing dataset. For females, cognitive impairment or receiving social support predicted malnutrition. The predictors for males were falling in the previous 2 years, hospitalisation in the past year and self-reported difficulties in climbing stairs. Incorporation of these findings into public health policy and clinical practice would support the early identification and management of malnutrition.

scholarly journals The Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form and mortality in nursing home residents — Results from the INCUR study

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Lilamand ◽  
E. Kelaiditi ◽  
L. Demougeot ◽  
Y. Rolland ◽  
B. Vellas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment

Mini nutritional assessment test long and short form are valid screening tools in Turkish older adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Sarikaya ◽  
Meltem Halil ◽  
Mehmet Emin Kuyumcu ◽  
Mustafa Kemal Kilic ◽  
Yusuf Yesil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Screening Tools

STRONG RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALNUTRITION AND COGNITIVE FRAILTY IN THE SINGAPORE LONGITUDINAL AGEING STUDIES (SLAS-1 AND SLAS-2)

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
L. Chye ◽  
K. Wei ◽  
M.S.Z. Nyunt ◽  
Q. Gao ◽  
S.L. Wee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cognitive Frailty ◽  
Nutrition Screening

Background: Physical frailty is well known to be strongly associated with malnutrition, but the combined impact of physical frailty and cognitive impairment among non-demented older persons (cognitive frailty) on malnutrition prevalence is not well documented. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling older Singaporeans aged ≥55y (n=5414) without dementia in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study (SLAS-1 and SLAS-2). Measurements: The Mini Nutritional Assessment – short form (MNA-SF) and Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI) Determine Checklist were used to determine their nutritional status. Participants were categorized as cognitive normal (CN) or cognitive impaired (CI) by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE<=23), as pre-frail (PF) (score=1-2) or frail (F) (score=3-5) using Fried’s criteria, and as cognitive pre-frail (PF+CI) or cognitive frail (F+CI). Results: The prevalence of cognitive frailty was 1.6%, and cognitive pre-frailty was 5.5% (total, 7.1%). The prevalence of MNA malnutrition was 2.4%, and NSI high nutritional risk was 6.3%. The prevalence of MNA malnutrition was lowest among Robust-CN and highest among Frail-CI (0.5% in Robust-CN, 0.6% in Robust-CI, 2.8% in Pre-frail-CN, 7.3% in Pre-frail-CI, 15.4% in Frail-CN, and 23.1% in Frail-CI). Similarly, the prevalence of NSI high nutritional risk was lowest in Robust-CN (3.7%) and highest in Frail-CI (13.6%). Adjusted for sociodemographic and health status, pre-frailty/frailty-CI versus Robust-CN was associated with the highest odds ratio of association with MNA malnutrition (OR=8.16, p<0.001), although not the highest with NSI high nutritional risk (OR=1.48, p=0.017). Conclusions: An extraordinary high prevalence of malnutrition was observed among older adults with cognitive frailty who should be specially targeted for active intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document