Professor Penelhum on the Resurrection of the Body

1973 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Young

In his recent book, Survival and Disembodied Existence Terence Penelhum presents a convincing case against the belief in disembodied personal survival. His formidable attack constitutes, I think, one of the strongest cases that has yet been made out against such a belief. I am in substantial agreement with his position.

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (supplement) ◽  
pp. 46-63
Author(s):  
Vidar Thorsteinsson

The paper explores the relation of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's work to that of Deleuze and Guattari. The main focus is on Hardt and Negri's concept of ‘the common’ as developed in their most recent book Commonwealth. It is argued that the common can complement what Nicholas Thoburn terms the ‘minor’ characteristics of Deleuze's political thinking while also surpassing certain limitations posed by Hardt and Negri's own previous emphasis on ‘autonomy-in-production’. With reference to Marx's notion of real subsumption and early workerism's social-factory thesis, the discussion circles around showing how a distinction between capital and the common can provide a basis for what Alberto Toscano calls ‘antagonistic separation’ from capital in a more effective way than can the classical capital–labour distinction. To this end, it is demonstrated how the common might benefit from being understood in light of Deleuze and Guattari's conceptual apparatus, with reference primarily to the ‘body without organs’ of Anti-Oedipus. It is argued that the common as body without organs, now understood as constituting its own ‘social production’ separate from the BwO of capital, can provide a new basis for antagonistic separation from capital. Of fundamental importance is how the common potentially invents a novel regime of qualitative valorisation, distinct from capital's limitation to quantity and scarcity.


1960 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. MacDonald ◽  
S. Kobayashi ◽  
E. G. Thomsen

Several press forgings were made and it was found that the experimental mean forging pressures were in substantial agreement with values predicted by theoretical solutions based on an approximate theory. The forging processes were axial symmetric forging of disks between flat dies and forging in closed dies with several edge effects, such as overhanging flash, with and without flash-edge restriction. The materials were commerically pure aluminum and lead and were chosen because of their respective work-hardening and strain-rate effects at room temperature. It was found further that the local pressures measured in the forging were in good agreement with the theory, but that some local plastic flow tends to equalize the pressure in the body of the forging.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Bech ◽  
George Walkden

In their recent book,English: The Language of the Vikings, Joseph Embley Emonds and Jan Terje Faarlund attempt to make the case that from its Middle period onwards, English is a North Germanic language, descended from the Norse varieties spoken in Medieval England, rather than a West Germanic language, as traditionally assumed. In this review article we critique Emonds & Faarlund's proposal, focusing particularly on the syntactic evidence that forms the basis of their argumentation. A closer look at a number of constructions for which the authors suggest a Norse origin reveals that the situation is not as they present it: in many cases, the syntactic properties of Old and Middle English are not given careful enough consideration, and/or the chronology of the developments is not compatible with a Norse origin. Moreover, the authors do not engage with the large body of sound changes that constitute the strongest evidence for a West Germanic origin. We conclude that Emonds & Faarlund fail to make a convincing case either for a North Germanic origin or against a West Germanic origin.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gelernter

Human culture denies vegetal existence in its own right; the body of the plant must return to the soul of plants—claims a recent book. Daniel Gelernter reviews Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives by Luce Irigaray and Michael Marder.


During recent years McCarrsion (1919 a, b , and 1920) has published a series of important papers dealing with the effect of deficient diets on the various organs of the body. One very striking result which he has described was a great enlargement of the suprarenal glands, with pronounced increase in their content of adrenaline, in pigeons fed on published rice and suffering from the consequent polyneuritis. McCarrison’s experience led him to put forward the tentative suggestion, that the increase content of adrenaline might be significant of increased output of adrenaline during the development of the disease, and that this might account for the occurrence of œdema both in experimental polyneuritis produced in pigeons and in the wet form of human beri-beri. In certain later experiments on pigeons fed in polished rice with the addition of butter and onions, he found that the polyneuritis, which was quickly produced on this diet, was only rarely accompanied by œdema. There were several points in McCarrison’s suggestive observations which seemed worthy of further investigation. In the first place it was not clear whether the effect of an exclusive diet of polished rice on the adrenals of pigeons was due to specific deficiency of the accessary factors concerned with the development of polyneuritis, or to the more general deficiency of protein, fat or salts entailed by such a diet. In the second place, assuming the effect to be a specific one, and McCarrison right in suggesting a causal connection between excess of adrenaline and the appearance of œdema, corresponding to the wet from of ber-beri, it seemed that the investigation of this connection might lead to results of more general pathological importance. While the work was in progress McCarrison himself found reason to withdraw the suggestion, which he had put forward at an earlier stage, so that the position to which my own experiments have led me is in substantial agreement with that which McCarrison now holds. At the same time it seems worth while to put on record the experiments made on this aspect of the question.


Philosophy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-431
Author(s):  
Fred Ablondi

The answer which Joseph Almog gives to the question which serves as the title of his recent book What Am I? (subtitled: Descartes and the Mind-Body Problem) is based upon his interpretation of (1) and objection to Descartes' argument for the distinction of the mind and the body raised by Antoine Arnauld, as well as Descartes' response to it, and (2) Descartes' letters of 9 February 1645 to Denis Mesland. I will argue that both of these interpretations are incorrect, and as such do not support the conclusions which Almog claims to draw from them. The answer, then to the question of what I am which Almog provides is, I believe, not one Descartes would have held, nor one which his writings support.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Spurrett

Abstract Comprehensive accounts of resource-rational attempts to maximise utility shouldn't ignore the demands of constructing utility representations. This can be onerous when, as in humans, there are many rewarding modalities. Another thing best not ignored is the processing demands of making functional activity out of the many degrees of freedom of a body. The target article is almost silent on both.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document