Tutorial computer-assisted language learning

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trude Heift ◽  
Mathias Schulze
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Written Language ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Language Awareness ◽  
Systematic Overview ◽  
Awareness Raising

‘Sometimes maligned for its allegedly behaviorist connotations but critical for success in many fields from music to sport to mathematics and language learning, practice is undergoing something of a revival in the applied linguistics literature’ (Long & Richards 2007, p. xi). This research timeline provides a systematic overview of the contributions of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) to the role, nature, and development of individual practice in language learning. We focus on written language practice in Tutorial CALL, corrective feedback and language awareness-raising in Intelligent CALL (ICALL), and individualization of the learning process through tailoring of learning sequences and contingent guidance.

scholarly journals The spread of computer-assisted language learning

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Chapelle
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Clear Distinction ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Culture Learning ◽  
Language And Culture ◽  
Research Perspectives

This paper argues that the vertical spread of computer-assisted language learning (CALL), i.e., a spread throughout language materials and curricula, makes it difficult to draw a clear distinction between CALL and other language materials. In view of the emphasis that teachers, researchers, and administrators have placed on evaluating CALL, I argue that some valuable lessons about materials evaluation can be drawn from reflection on issues in CALL evaluation. In particular, I discuss the opportunities for professionals to reconsider assumptions held about comparative research, draw upon research perspectives and methods from applied linguistics in materials evaluation, and include critical perspectives which examine the opportunities that materials offer language learners to engage in language and culture learning.

Intelligent CALL Systems for Writing Development

2021 ◽  
pp. 252-273
Author(s):  
Niall Curry ◽  
Elaine Riordan
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
Writing Development ◽  
Written Language ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Learner Engagement ◽  
Writing Practices ◽  
Teacher Surveys

Technological innovation in supporting feedback on writing is well established in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) literature. Regarding writing development, research has found that intelligent CALL systems that respond instantly to learners' language can support their production of better-written texts. To investigate this claim further, this chapter presents a study on learner use of Write & Improve (W&I). The study, based on learner engagement with W&I and learner and teacher surveys and focus groups, demonstrates that learners find W&I to be engaging and motivating. Moreover, there is evidence of improvements in learner writing practices and written language proficiency. For teachers, W&I can render feedback more efficient, allowing them to focus on more complex aspects of learner texts, while spelling and syntactic accuracy are addressed by W&I. Issues also emerge in the use of W&I, which present problem areas for teachers and learners and which signal important future considerations for CALL research.

LANGUAGE LEARNING THROUGH SOCIAL COMPUTING: OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE APPLIED LINGUISTICS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA, 16.Robert Debski, June Gassin, and Mike Smith (Eds.). Melbourne: ALAA & The Horwood Language Centre, 1997. Pp. viii + 224. A$12.00 paper.

1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-503
Author(s):  
Carol A. Chapelle
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Classroom Practices ◽  
Social Computing ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Target Language ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning

The papers in Language learning through social computing introduce the classroom practices and philosophical underpinnings of computer-assisted language learning (CALL), which builds on collaborative approaches to L2 teaching and learning. The majority of the essays address general issues in collaborative learning through CALL, describing the authors' experience and reflections on L2 activities designed to engage learners in interesting discussions and projects, many of which rely on target language materials from the Internet.

scholarly journals Language teaching

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Teacher Perceptions ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Language Awareness ◽  
Web Based

05–206Chan, Tun-Pei & Hsien-Chin Liou (National Tsing Hua U, Taiwan, China), Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verb–noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (London, UK) 18.3 (2005), 231–251.05–207Chang, Mei-Mei (National Pingtung U of Science and Technology, Taiwan, China), Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction – an investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (London, UK) 18.3 (2005), 217–230.05–208Coleman, James A. (The Open U, UK; [email protected]), CALL from the margins: effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK) 17.1 (2005), 18–31.05–209Eslami-Rasekh, Zohreh (Texas A and M U, USA; [email protected]), Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.3 (2005), 199–208.05–210Foley, J. (SEAMEO RELC, Singapore; [email protected]), English in…Thailand. RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 36.2 (2005), 223–234.05–211Frankenberg-Garcia, Ana (ISLA, Lisbon, Portugal; [email protected]), Pedagogical uses of monolingual and parallel concordances. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.3 (2005), 189–198.05–212Hansson, Thomas (U of Southern Denmark, Denmark), English as a second language on a virtual platform – tradition and innovation in a new medium. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (London, UK) 18.1/2 (2005), 63–79.05–213Hu, Guangwei (Nanyang Technological U, Singapore), Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research (London, UK) 9.3 (2005), 321–342.05–214Jung, Udo O. H. (Bonn, Germany; [email protected]), CALL: past, present and future – a bibliometric approach. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK) 17.1 (2005), 4–17.05–215Kaltenböck, Gunther & Barbara Mehlmauer-Larcher (U of Vienna, Austria; [email protected]), Computer corpora and the language classroom: on the potential and limitations of computer corpora in language teaching. ReCALL (UK) 17.1 (2005), 65–84.05–216Lasagabaster, David & Juan M. Sierra (U del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Spain), Error correction: students' versus teachers' perceptions. Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 14.2/3 (2005), 112–128.05–217Liu, Gi-Zen (National Cheng Kung U, Taiwan, China; [email protected]), The trend and challenge for teaching EFL at Taiwanese universities. RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 36.2 (2005), 211–221.05–218Lundy, Garvey F. (Pennsylvania U, USA; [email protected]), School resistance in American high schools: the role of race and gender in oppositional culture theory. Evaluation & Research in Education (Clevedon, UK) 17.1 (2003), 6–30.05–219Nemtchinova, Ekaterina (Seattle Pacific U, USA; [email protected]), Host teachers' evaluations of non-native-English-speaking teacher trainees: a perspective from the classroom. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39.2, 235–262.05–220Nickerson, Catherine, Marinel Gerritsen & Frank v. Meurs (Radboud U, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; [email protected]), Raising student awareness of the use of English for specific business purposes in the European context: a staff–student project. English for Specific Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 24.3 (2005), 333–345.05–221Palfreyman, David (Zayed U, Dubai, UAE), Othering in an English Language Program. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39.2, 211–234.05–222Sonck, Gerda (U Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium), Language of instruction and instructed languages in Mauritius. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (Clevedon, UK) 26.1 (2005), 37–51.05–223Svalberg, Agneta M. L. (U of Leicester, UK), Consciousness-raising activities in some Lebanese English language classrooms: teacher perceptions and learner engagement. Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 14.2/3 (2005), 170–193.05–224Wegerif, Rupert (Southampton U, UK; [email protected]), Reason and creativity in classroom dialogues. Language and Education (Clevedon, UK) 19.3 (2005), 223–237.

Why Studying Individual Differences in CALL?

2019 ◽  
pp. 26-49
Author(s):  
Maryam Tayebinik ◽  
Marlia Puteh
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Net Generation ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Mediated Learning ◽  
Delivery Methods

The present chapter aims to highlight the importance of studying individual differences (IDs) in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). This study begins with a brief overview of drastic changes in educational delivery methods by wide application of technological tools and ends by developing a framework that emphasizes on the need for studying IDs in CALL settings. To gain a comprehensive support to develop this framework, an extensive literature review was conducted by focusing on a) instruction and technology integration, b) natural aptitude of Net generation for technology-mediated education, c) utilizing technology in language learning process, d) CALL properties, e) CALL advantages in second language learning, f) the effect of IDs in language learning, g) common taxonomies of IDs in language learning process, and h) the role of IDs in technology-mediated learning environments. This study motivates future research to find relationship between IDs and language learning CALL environments.

Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Design for Learning

2019 ◽  
pp. 129-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aysel Şahin Kızıl
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Educational Practices ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Educational Design ◽  
Learner Centered ◽  
Design For Learning

The learning context has gradually become more technology-rich and learner-centered along with the learning process, which is extensively regarded as configurative and dynamic. This has brought about significant shifts in educational practices. This shift has a crucial impact both on the field of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) and on the approaches to educational design, giving way to the emergence of design for learning. This chapter is an attempt to explore potential synergies between CALL and design for learning, which is thought to strengthen the CALL practices and make an effective base for CALL design.

CMC and Intercultural Learning

2011 ◽  
pp. 361-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Möllering ◽  
Markus Ritter
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Software Tools ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Intercultural Learning ◽  
Global Networks ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Threaded Discussion ◽  
E Mail

One key theme in the area of computer-assisted language learning has been the potential of computermediated communication (CMC) for the language learning process. Here, CMC refers to communication conducted through the medium of computers connected to one another in local or global networks. It requires specific software tools and can be either synchronous (e.g., chat, audio- or videoconferencing) or asynchronous (e.g., e-mail, threaded discussion lists). This chapter explores how CMC might contribute to language learning and teaching. Starting off with an overview of the development of research in this field, a model for the analysis of successful telecollaboration procedures and processes is used for the discussion of a German-Australian exchange.

scholarly journals Awareness and Corrective Feedback in Social CALL, Tandems, and E-Tandems

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Guillén
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Social Networking Sites ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Computer Mediated ◽  
Dickinson College ◽  
Tandem Learning

Previous studies have identified advantages for second languagelearning in computer mediated settings (Kern, 1995, Warschauer,1997, Blake, 2008), particularly through online interculturalcollaboration (Furstenberg et al, 2001, Vinagre, 2005, O’Dowd, 2007,Bower & Kawaguchi, 2011). However, face-to-face (tandems) andonline (e-tandems) language exchanges remain peripheral to foreignlanguage education (O’Dowd, 2010, 2013) and rely heavily oninstructor guidance (Beltz, 2003, Bower & Kawaguchi, 2011), in spiteof the proliferation of Language Learning Social Networking Sites(LLSNs) such as Livemocha, Busuu, Shared Talk, and The Mixxer(Dickinson College). In response, this paper analyzes tandem andsocial Computer Assisted Language Learning (sCALL) awareness andexperiences among students and instructors of Spanish at the collegelevel by means of a survey and two pilot studies on tandem learning.The results of this research should encourage administrators andinstructors to support tandem learning and implement tandem andsCALL activities as co-curricular, semi-guided projects. The need ofpreparation for the tandem experience is also emphasized, particularlyin regards to corrective feedback.

Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment

ReCALL ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Ai
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Second Language Acquisition ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
L2 Development ◽  
Design Effectiveness ◽  
Intelligent Computer ◽  
Scholarly Attention

AbstractCorrective feedback (CF), a response to linguistic errors made by second language (L2) learners, has received extensive scholarly attention in second language acquisition. While much of the previous research in the field has focused on whether CF facilitates or impedes L2 development, few studies have examined the efficacy of gradually modifying the explicitness or specificity of CF as a function of a learner’s response to the feedback. Yet, the type and extent of CF needed by a learner, as suggested by Vygotsky (1978), sheds light on whether a learner is developing his or her abilities in a particular area and the ways in which they do it. This paper reports on a study that explores the design, effectiveness and learners’ perception toward agraduated(Aljaafreh & Lantolf, 1994) approach to CF, i.e., feedback that progresses from very general and implicit to very specific and explicit, in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning (ICALL) environment. The results show that the graduated approach to CF is effective in helping learners to self-identify and self-correct a number of grammatical issues, although an onsite tutor provides necessary remedies when the ICALL system occasionally fails to do its part. Implications for CF research, particularly on the notion of individualized feedback, are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document