Estimation of a Structural Equation when Reduced Form Coefficients are Known

1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-446
Author(s):  
Cheng Hsiao ◽  
Kimio Morimune
1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Kleibergen ◽  
Herman K. van Dijk

Diffuse priors lead to pathological posterior behavior when used in Bayesian analyses of simultaneous equation models (SEM's). This results from the local nonidentification of certain parameters in SEM's. When this a priori known feature is not captured appropriately, it results in an a posteriori favoring of certain specific parameter values that is not the consequence of strong data information but of local nonidentification. We show that a proper consistent Bayesian analysis of a SEM explicitly has to consider the reduced form of the SEM as a standard linear model on which nonlinear (reduced rank) restrictions are imposed, which result from a singular value decomposition. The priors/posteriors of the parameters of the SEM are therefore proportional to the priors/posteriors of the parameters of the linear model under the condition that the restrictions hold. This leads to a framework for constructing priors and posteriors for the parameters of SEM's. The framework is used to construct priors and posteriors for one, two, and three structural equation SEM's. These examples together with a theorem, showing that the reduced forms of SEM's accord with sets of reduced rank restrictions on standard linear models, show how Bayesian analyses of generally specified SEM's can be conducted.


1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant H. Hillier

Starting from the conditional density of the instrumental variable (IV) estimator given the right-hand-side endogenous variables, we provide an alternative derivation of Phillips' result on the joint density of the IV estimator for the endogenous coefficients, and derive an expression for the marginal density of a linear combination of these coefficients. In addition, we extend Phillips' approximation to the joint density to 0(T−2,) and show how this result can be used to improve the approximation to the marginal density. Explicit formulae are given for the special case of no simultaneity, and the case of an equation with just three endogenous variables. The classical assumptions of independent normal reduced-form errors are employed throughout.


1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kaplan ◽  
Pamela R. Elliott

This article considers an approach to validating the selection of education indicators by incorporating them into a multilevel structural model and using the estimates from that model to engage in policy-relevant simulations. Multilevel structural equation modeling was applied to a subsample of the first follow-up of the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 ( National Center for Education Statistics, 1988 ) to demonstrate the potential of this approach. Focus of attention was on science education indicators. A within-school model of science achievement was linked to a between-school model of the academic press of the school. Separate estimation of these models revealed adequate fit to the data after minor modifications. The multilevel model also showed adequate fit to the data. Utilizing the reduced form of the full multilevel model, predictive validity of the model was studied by gauging movements in various outcome indicators as a function of changes in policy-relevant input indicators. The article closes with a discussion of the limitations of the proposed modeling approach, the potential for future model development, and the implications of this approach for quantitative modeling within the domain of education policy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-550
Author(s):  
Theodore W. Anderson

Consider testing the null hypothesis that a single structural equation has specified coefficients. The alternative hypothesis is that the relevant part of the reduced form matrix has proper rank, that is, that the equation is identified. The usual linear model with normal disturbances is invariant with respect to linear transformations of the endogenous and of the exogenous variables. When the disturbance covariance matrix is known, it can be set to the identity, and the invariance of the endogenous variables is with respect to orthogonal transformations. The likelihood ratio test is invariant with respect to these transformations and is the best invariant test. Furthermore it is admissible in the class of all tests. Any other test has lower power and/or higher significance level. In particular, this likelihood ratio test dominates a test based on the Two-Stage Least Squares estimator.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Knight

This paper examines the sensitivity of the distributions of OLS and 2SLS estimators to the assumption of normality of disturbances in a structural equation with two included endogenous variables. The approach taken is that ofimposing Edgeworth distributed errors on the reduced form equations and deriving the pdf of the estimators via the technique of Davis [11]. The sensitivity of the pdf s to changes in the non-normality parameters, i.e., skewness and kurtosis i s examined via extensive numerical computations.


1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiro Hodoshima

Estimation of a single structural equation when there exists structural change is considered. Equality of structural variances in different samples is shown to affect the identification condition and asymptotic efficiency of best asymptotically normal estimators when the reduced-form covariance matrices differ by the structural change. The limited information maximum likelihood estimator is presented with its asymptotic property and compared with an alternative estimator.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Aluja ◽  
Àngel Blanch ◽  
Eduardo Blanco ◽  
Maite Martí-Guiu ◽  
Ferran Balada

AbstractThis study has been designed to evaluate and replicate the psychometric properties of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Psychopathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ) and the DAPP-BQ short form (DAPP-SF) in a large Spanish general population sample. Additionally, we have generated a reduced form called DAPP-90, using a strategy based on a structural equation modeling (SEM) methodology in two independent samples, a calibration and a validation sample. The DAPP-90 scales obtained a more satisfactory fit on SEM adjustment values (average: TLI > .97 and RMSEA < .04) respect to full DAPP-BQ and the 136-item version. According to the factorial congruency coefficients, the DAPP-90 obtains a similar structure to the DAPP-BQ and the DAPP-SF. The DAPP-90 internal consistency is acceptable, with a Cronbach’s alpha mean of .75. We did not find any differences in the pattern of relations between the two DAPP-BQ shortened versions and the SCL-90-R factors. The new 90-items version is especially useful when it is difficult to use the long version for diverse reasons, such as the assessment of patients in hospital consultation or in brief psychological assessments.


1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-179
Author(s):  
Cheng Hsiao ◽  
Kimio Morimune

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
Arya Fendha Ibnu Shina

Single equation models ignore interdependencies or two-way relationships between response variables. The simultaneous equation model accommodates this two-way relationship form. Two Stage Least Square Generalized Methods of Moment Arellano and Bond (2 SLS GMM-AB) is used to estimate the parameters in the simultaneous system model of dynamic panel data if each structural equation is exactly identified or over identified. In the simultaneous equation system model with dynamic panel data, each structural equation and reduced form is a dynamic panel data regression equation. Estimation of structural equations and reduced form using Ordinary Least Square (OLS) resulted biased and inconsistent estimators. Arellano and Bond GMM method (GMM AB) estimator produces unbiased, consistent, and efficient estimators.The purpose of this paper is to explain the steps of 2 SLS GMM-AB method to estimate parameter in simultaneous equation model with dynamic panel data.  Keywords:2 SLS GMM-AB, Arellano and Bond estimator, Dynamic Panel Data, Simultaneous Equations


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document