Evaluating the Latest Performance of Precise Point Positioning in Multi-GNSS/RNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BDS, Galileo and QZSS

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Chen ◽  
Xingwang Zhao ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Shaolin Zhu ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Elevation Angle ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
North East ◽  
The North ◽  
Point Positioning

The single initial Global Positioning System (GPS) has been expanded into multiple global and regional navigation satellite systems (multi-GNSS/RNSS) as the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) is restored and the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), Galileo Satellite Navigation System (Galileo) and Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) evolve. Using the differences among these five systems, the paper constructs a consolidated multi-GNSS/RNSS precise point positioning (PPP) observation model. A large number of datasets from Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations are employed to evaluate the PPP performance of multi-GNSS/RNSS. The paper draws three main conclusions based on the experimental results. (1) The combined GPS/GLONASS/Galileo/BDS/QZSS presents the PPP with the shortest mean convergence time of 11·5 min, followed by that of GPS/GLONASS/Galileo/BDS (12·4 min). (2) The combined GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo/QZSS shows the optimal PPP performance when the cut-off elevation angle is basically the same because of the rich observation data due to a large number of satellites. To be specific, for combined GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo/QZSS, the PPP convergence percentage is 80·9% higher relative to other combined systems under 35° cut-off elevation angle, and the percentages of the root mean square values of PPP within 0–5 cm are enhanced by 80·5%, 81·5% and 87·3% in the North, East and Up directions relative to GPS alone at 35° cut-off elevation angle. (3) GPS alone fails to conduct continuous positioning due to the insufficiency of visible satellites at 40° cut-off elevation angle, while the kinematic PPP of multi-GNSS/RNSS remains capable of obtaining positioning solutions with relatively high accuracy, especially in the horizontal direction.

scholarly journals Precise Point Positioning with Almost Fully Deployed BDS-3, BDS-2, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS Using Precise Products from Different Analysis Centers

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3905
Author(s):  
Xuanping Li ◽  
Lin Pan
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
The Real ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Point Positioning

The space segment of all the five satellite systems capable of providing precise position services, namely BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) (including BDS-3 and BDS-2), Global Positioning System (GPS), GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS), Galileo and Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS), has almost been fully deployed at present, and the number of available satellites is approximately 136. Currently, the precise satellite orbit and clock products from the analysis centers European Space Agency (ESA), GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WHU) can support all five satellite systems. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the positioning performance of a five-system integrated precise point positioning (PPP) (i.e., GRECJ-PPP) using the precise products from different analysis centers under the current constellation status. It should be noted that this study only focuses on the long-term performance of PPP based on daily observations. The static GRECJ-PPP can provide a convergence time of 5.9–6.9/2.6–3.1/6.3–7.1 min and a positioning accuracy of 0.2–0.3/0.2–0.3/1.0–1.1 cm in east/north/up directions, respectively, while the corresponding kinematic statistics are 6.8–8.6/3.3–4.0/7.8–8.1 min and 1.0–1.1/0.8/2.5–2.6 cm in three directions, respectively. For completeness, although the real-time precise products from the analysis center Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) do not incorporate QZSS satellites, the performance of real-time PPP with the other four satellite systems (i.e., GREC-PPP) is also analyzed. The real-time GREC-PPP can achieve a static convergence time of 8.7/5.2/11.2 min, a static positioning accuracy of 0.6/0.8/1.3 cm, a kinematic convergence time of 11.5/6.9/13.0 min, and a kinematic positioning accuracy of 1.7/1.6/3.6 cm in the three directions, respectively. For comparison, the results of single-system and dual-system PPP are also provided. In addition, the consistency of the precise products from different analysis centers is characterized.

scholarly journals Precise Point Positioning Using the Regional BeiDou Navigation Satellite Constellation

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aigong Xu ◽  
Zongqiu Xu ◽  
Xinchao Xu ◽  
Huizhong Zhu ◽  
Xin Sui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Point Positioning

On 27 December 2012 it was announced officially that the Chinese Navigation Satellite System BeiDou (BDS) was able to provide operational services over the Asia-Pacific region. The quality of BDS observations was confirmed as comparable with those of GPS, and relative positioning in static and kinematic modes were also demonstrated to be very promising. As Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technology is widely recognized as a method of precise positioning service, especially in real-time, in this contribution we concentrate on the PPP performance using BDS data only. BDS PPP in static, kinematic and simulated real-time kinematic mode is carried out for a regional network with six stations equipped with GPS- and BDS-capable receivers, using precise satellite orbits and clocks estimated from a global BDS tracking network. To validate the derived positions and trajectories, they are compared to the daily PPP solution using GPS data. The assessment confirms that the performance of BDS PPP is very comparable with GPS in terms of both convergence time and accuracy.

scholarly journals Multi-GNSS Combined Precise Point Positioning Using Additional Observations with Opposite Weight for Real-Time Quality Control

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenju Fu ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Yuanxi Zhang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Bobin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The emergence of multiple global navigation satellite systems (multi-GNSS), including global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS), and Galileo, brings not only great opportunities for real-time precise point positioning (PPP), but also challenges in quality control because of inevitable data anomalies. This research aims at achieving the real-time quality control of the multi-GNSS combined PPP using additional observations with opposite weight. A robust multiple-system combined PPP estimation is developed to simultaneously process observations from all the four GNSS systems as well as single, dual, or triple systems. The experiment indicates that the proposed quality control can effectively eliminate the influence of outliers on the single GPS and the multiple-system combined PPP. The analysis on the positioning accuracy and the convergence time of the proposed robust PPP is conducted based on one week’s data from 32 globally distributed stations. The positioning root mean square (RMS) error of the quad-system combined PPP is 1.2 cm, 1.0 cm, and 3.0 cm in the east, north, and upward components, respectively, with the improvements of 62.5%, 63.0%, and 55.2% compared to those of single GPS. The average convergence time of the quad-system combined PPP in the horizontal and vertical components is 12.8 min and 12.2 min, respectively, while it is 26.5 min and 23.7 min when only using single-GPS PPP. The positioning performance of the GPS, GLONASS, and BDS (GRC) combination and the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GRE) combination is comparable to the GPS, GLONASS, BDS and Galileo (GRCE) combination and it is better than that of the GPS, BDS, and Galileo (GCE) combination. Compared to GPS, the improvements of the positioning accuracy of the GPS and GLONASS (GR) combination, the GPS and Galileo (GE) combination, the GPS and BDS (GC) combination in the east component are 53.1%, 43.8%, and 40.6%, respectively, while they are 55.6%, 48.1%, and 40.7% in the north component, and 47.8%, 40.3%, and 34.3% in the upward component.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF POSITIONING DEVIATION BETWEEN BEIDOU AND GPS BASED ON NATIONAL REFERENCE STATIONS IN CHINA

2021 ◽  
Vol XLIII-B1-2021 ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
M. Chen ◽  
Q. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Global Coordinate System ◽  
Gps Data ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
National Reference ◽  
The North ◽  
Processing Modes

Abstract. In order to probe into the characteristics of positioning deviation between Beidou Navigation Satellite System (Beidou) and global positioning system (GPS), and investigate possible contribution of Beidou data to refinement of global coordinate system, refined calculation is made on observation data of 240 national reference stations that are distributed uniformly across China on the whole in this study. These stations support satellite signals of four global navigation satellite systems, including Beidou, GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, and a 5-year time span from 2016 to 2020 is adopted. In this study, PPP is calculated based on GPS data and Beidou single system data in no-difference resolution network mode, and accurate coordinates of national reference stations in two processing modes are obtained. Analysis of difference between the calculations based on Beidou data and on GPS data shows that the consistency between Beidou and GPS positioning results reaches about 5 mm in the east and in the north, and about 1.3 cm in the height direction.

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of Precise Point Positioning for BeiDou-3 B1c/B2a Signals in the Global Range

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5780
Author(s):  
Ershen Wang ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
Zhi Wang ◽  
Yize Zhang ◽  
Jing Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
The North ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
System Bias ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Ppp

With the construction and development of the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), the precise point positioning (PPP) performance of the BDS is worthy of research. In this study, observational data from 17 stations around the world across 20 days are used to comprehensively evaluate the PPP performance of BDS B1c/B2a signals. For greater understanding, the results are also compared with the Global Positioning System (GPS) and BDS PPP performance of different signals and system combinations. The evaluation found root mean square (RMS) values of the static PPP in the north (N), east (E), and upward (U) components, based on the B1c/B2a frequency of BDS-3, to be 6.9 mm, 4.7 mm, and 26.6 mm, respectively. Similar to the static positioning, the RMS values of kinematic PPP in the three directions of N, E, and U are 2.6 cm, 6.0 cm, and 8.5 cm, respectively. Besides this, the static PPP of BDS-3 (B1cB2a) and BDS-2 + BDS-3 (B1IB3I) have obvious system bias. Compared with static PPP, kinematic PPP is more sensitive to the number of satellites, and the coordinate accuracy in three dimensions can be increased by 27% with the combination of GPS (L1L2) and BDS. Compared with BDS-2+BDS-3 (B1IB3I), the convergence time of BDS-3 (B1CB2a) performs better in both static and kinematic modes. The antenna model does not show a significant difference in terms of the effect of the convergence speed, though the number of satellites observed has a certain influence on the convergence time.

scholarly journals Assessment of BeiDou-3 and Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning Performance

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Jiao ◽  
Shuli Song ◽  
Yulong Ge ◽  
Ke Su ◽  
Yangyang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Kinematic Positioning ◽  
Global Coverage ◽  
Point Positioning

With the launch of BDS-3 and Galileo new satellites, the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) has developed from the regional to global system, and the Galileo constellation will consist of 26 satellites in space. Thus, BDS, GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo all have the capability of global positioning services. It is meaningful to evaluate the ability of global precise point positioning (PPP) of the GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo. This paper mainly contributes to the assessment of BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo PPP with the observations that were provided by the international Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS). The Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) value was utilized to research the global coverage of GPS, BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo. In particular, GPS-only, BDS-2-only, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS-only, Galileo-only, and multi-GNSS combined PPP solutions were analyzed to verify the capacity of the PPP performances in terms of positioning accuracy, convergence time, and zenith troposphere delay (ZTD) accuracy. In view of PDOP, the current BDS and Galileo are capable of global coverage. The BDS-2/BDS-3 and Galileo PDOP values are fairly evenly distributed around the world similar to GPS and GLONASS. The root mean square (RMS) of positioning errors for static BDS-2/BDS-3 PPP and Galileo-only PPP are 10.7, 19.5, 20.4 mm, and 6.9, 18.6, 19.6 mm, respectively, in the geographic area of the selected station, which is the same level as GPS and GLONASS. It is worth mentioning that, by adding BDS-3 observations, the positioning accuracy of static BDS PPP is improved by 17.05%, 24.42%, and 35.65%, and the convergence time is reduced by 27.15%, 27.87%, and 35.76% in three coordinate components, respectively. Similar to the static positioning, GPS, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo have the basically same kinematic positioning accuracy. Multi-GNSS PPP significantly improves the positioning performances in both static and kinematic positioning. In terms of ZTD accuracy, the difference between GPS, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo is less than 1 mm, and the BDS-2/BDS-3 improves ZTD accuracy by 20.48% over the BDS-2. The assessment of GPS, BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, Galileo, and multi-GNSS global PPP performance are shown to make comments for the development of multi-GNSS integration, global precise positioning, and the construction of iGMAS.

scholarly journals Assessment of GPS/Galileo/BDS Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution Using Products from Different Analysis Centers

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3266
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Guorui Xiao ◽  
Guobin Chang ◽  
Tianhe Xu ◽  
Liu Yang
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Major Drawback ◽  
System Combination ◽  
North East ◽  
Positioning Errors ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Ppp

Suffering from hardware phase biases originating from satellites and the receiver, precise point positioning (PPP) requires a long convergence time to reach centimeter coordinate accuracy, which is a major drawback of this technique and limits its application in time-critical applications. Ambiguity resolution (AR) is the key to a fast convergence time and a high-precision solution for PPP technology and PPP AR products are critical to implement PPP AR. Nowadays, various institutions provide PPP AR products in different forms with different strategies, which allow to enable PPP AR for Global Positioning System (GPS) and Galileo or BeiDou Navigation System (BDS). To give a full evaluation of PPP AR performance with various products, this work comprehensively investigates the positioning performance of GPS-only and multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) combination PPP AR with the precise products from CNES, SGG, CODE, and PRIDE Lab using our in-house software. The positioning performance in terms of positioning accuracy, convergence time and fixing rate (FR) as well as time to first fix (TTFF), was assessed by static and kinematic PPP AR models. For GPS-only, combined GPS and Galileo PPP AR with different products, the positioning performances were all comparable with each other. Concretely, the static positioning errors can be reduced by 21.0% (to 0.46 cm), 52.5% (to 0.45 cm), 10.0% (to 1.33 cm) and 21.7% (to 0.33 cm), 47.4% (to 0.34 cm), 9.5% (to 1.16 cm) for GPS-only and GE combination in north, east, up component, respectively, while the reductions are 20.8% (to 1.13 cm), 42.9% (to 1.15 cm), 19.9% (to 3.4 cm) and 20.4% (to 0.72 cm), 44.1% (to 0.66 cm), 10.1% (to 2.44 cm) for kinematic PPP AR. Overall, the positioning performance with CODE products was superior to the others. Furthermore, multi-GNSS observations had significant improvements in PPP performance with float solutions and the TTFF as well as the FR of GPS PPP AR could be improved by adding observations from other GNSS. Additionally, we have released the source code for multi-GNSS PPP AR, anyone can freely access the code and example data from GitHub.

Evaluation and Application of the GPS Code Observable in Precise Point Positioning

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (06) ◽  
pp. 1633-1648
Author(s):  
Haojun Li ◽  
Jingxin Xiao ◽  
Bofeng Li
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
The North ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Accumulation Characteristic ◽  
Better Than

The accuracy of the Global Positioning System (GPS) observable, especially for the code observable, has improved with the development of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver technology. An evaluation of the GPS code observable is presented in this paper, together with a stochastic model for the code and phase observables in Precise Point Positioning (PPP), established using the evaluated results. The results show that the code observables of Leica GNSS receivers are generally better than those of some other brand receivers and the Root Mean Square (RMS) for the code observables of the Leica GRX1200PRO, which includes the multipath effect, reaches 0·71 m, although Coarse/Acquisition (C/A) code observables are tracked. The static positioning of the code observable can reach centimetre level and the convergence time for the JPLM station is just 2·5 hours. The positioning results show that it is difficult to converge the Up direction to the centimetre level, compared with the North and East directions. The results show that static positioning can be correlated with the accumulation characteristic of the error for the code observable, while that that of the kinematic mode can be correlated to the error value. The shortened PPP convergence times verify that the presented stochastic models are effective.

scholarly journals Real-Time Precise Point Positioning Using Orbit and Clock Corrections as Quasi-Observations for Improved Detection of Faults

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El-Mowafy
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Exclusion Process ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
System Service ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Predicted Values ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Real-time Precise Point Positioning (PPP) relies on the use of accurate satellite orbit and clock corrections. If these corrections contain large errors or faults, either from the system or by meaconing, they will adversely affect positioning. Therefore, such faults have to be detected and excluded. In traditional PPP, measurements that have faulty corrections are typically excluded as they are merged together. In this contribution, a new PPP model that encompasses the orbit and clock corrections as quasi-observations is presented such that they undergo the fault detection and exclusion process separate from the observations. This enables the use of measurements that have faulty corrections along with predicted values of these corrections in place of the excluded ones. Moreover, the proposed approach allows for inclusion of the complete stochastic information of the corrections. To facilitate modelling of the orbit and clock corrections as quasi-observations, International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS) real-time corrections were characterised over a six-month period. The proposed method is validated and its benefits are demonstrated at two sites using three days of data.

scholarly journals Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception)

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
A. Farah
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception) Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have an endless number of applications in industry, science, military, transportation and recreation & sports. Two systems are currently in operation namely GPS (the USA Global Positioning System) and GLONASS (the Russian GLObal NAvigation Satellite System), and a third is planned, the European satellite navigation system GALILEO. The potential performance improvements achievable through combining these systems could be significant and expectations are high. The need is inevitable to explore the future of positioning from different nominal constellations. In this research paper, Bernese 5.0 software could be modified to simulate and process GNSS observations from three different constellations (GPS, Glonass and Galileo) using different combinations. This study presents results of code single point positioning for five stations using the three constellations and different combinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document