The FDA's Proposal for Public Disclosure of Adverse Events in Gene Therapy Trials

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-268
Author(s):  
Deborah R. Barnbaum

In January 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed annual public disclosure of adverse events during gene therapy and xenotransplantation trials. The proposed policy raises the following questions: (1) Is the reformed policy in accord with the FDA's long-standing informed consent policies? (2) Why pair gene therapy trials and xenotransplantation trials in the revised guidelines? (3) Why single out these trials for public disclosure of adverse events? Each question is examined, and three conclusions are drawn. First, the FDA's own policies on informed consent require prompter public disclosure of adverse events. Second, the coupling of gene therapy and xenotransplantation trials entails a conceptual mistake in the types of communities that are harmed by each therapy's related adverse events. Third, all clinical trials merit such public disclosure of adverse events, not only gene therapy and xenotransplantation trials.

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-862
Author(s):  
Holly Sarvas ◽  
Benjamin Carlisle ◽  
Samantha Dolter ◽  
Esther Vinarov ◽  
Jonathan Kimmelman

Abstract Precision medicine (PM) offers opportunities for reducing the costs, burdens, and time associated with drug development. We examined time, number of trials, indications tested, and patient burden needed to achieve first U.S. Food and Drug Administration license for all five novel anticancer PM drugs and all 10 novel non-PM drugs receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval during 2010–2014. The 15 drug portfolios encompassed 242 trials: 87 for PM drugs and 155 for non-PM drugs. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched for all prelicensure clinical trials, and data on time, patient numbers, indications tested, and total treatment-emergent grade 3–5 adverse events were measured from the first trial of each drug. We did not find patterns suggesting greater efficiencies in PM compared with non-PM. Gains in efficiency for PM drug development may be offset by challenges with recruitment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1125-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Brannath ◽  
Hans Ulrich Burger ◽  
Ekkehard Glimm ◽  
Nigel Stallard ◽  
Marc Vandemeulebroecke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document