Fenetyline as possible treatment in non-responder depressive patients

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
F Lang ◽  
J Pellet ◽  
B Estour

SummaryThe authors report the case of a 45-yr-old male who presented from 1979 to 1986 with several severe depressive episodes. The patient fulfilled Feighner criteria for major depression, Newcastle criteria for endogenous depression: the depressive episodes were all classified as severe recurrent depression without melancholia according to DSM III. The patient was resistant to different types of treatment (ECT, tricyclic and MAOI drugs, lithium, sleep deprivation). With a treatment of 10 cg/day of fenetyline, reduced to 5 cg/day after 6 months, (atypical manic episode), the patient improved considerably for 20 rnonths. The therapeutic response decreased after this period but after a month of withdrawal, the patient again responded. The authors cannot explain the duration of this therapeutic response.

2001 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hochstrasser ◽  
P. M. Isaksen ◽  
H. Koponen ◽  
L. Lauritzen ◽  
F. A. Mahnert ◽  
...  

BackgroundMajor depression is highly recurrent. Antidepressant maintenance treatment has proven efficacy against recurrent depression.AimsComparison of prophylactic efficacy of citalopram versus placebo in unipolar, recurrent depression.MethodsPatients 18–65 years of age with recurrent unipolar major depression (DSM–IV), a Montgomery–åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≥ 22 and two or more previous depressive episodes, one within the past 5 years, were treated openly with citalopram (20–60 mg) for 6–9 weeks and, if responding, continued for 16 weeks before being randomised to double-blind maintenance treatment with citalopram or placebo for 48–77 weeks.ResultsA total of 427 patients entered acute treatment and 269 were randomised to double-blind treatment. Time to recurrence was longer in patients taking citalopram than in patients taking placebo (P < 0.001). Prophylactic treatment was well tolerated.ConclusionsCitalopram (20, 40 and 60 mg) is effective in the prevention of depressive recurrences. Patients at risk should continue maintenance treatment at the dose necessary to resolve symptoms in the acute treatment phase.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1136-1136
Author(s):  
A. Castillo ◽  
M. Lloret ◽  
M. Harto ◽  
A. Tatay ◽  
C. Almonacid ◽  
...  

IntroductionPsychotic symptoms in depression are indicators of severity and poor prognosis. It usually requires psychopharmacotherapy with antidepressants and antipsychotic agents and it may even require electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).Aims, methodologyTo review the indications of ECT in major depression through the study of a clinical case of a patient admitted in an indoor psychiatric unit.ResultsA 64-year-old woman diagnosed as bipolar affective disorder 20 years ago. Her first manic episode required hospitalization. Afterwards, she remained clinically stable for 18 years with pharmacotherapy with lithium. Lately she was admitted due to a major depressive episode with psychotic features (injury delusions, ruin and catastrophe). Antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment was added, improving her symptoms. However, she had to be readmitted two months later with severe psychotic symptoms that did not improve with pharmacological treatment. ECT was added to her treatment. She improved after a few sessions. During the last years, she has presented depressive episodes with psychotic symptoms at least once a year, and all of them have required ECT.ConclusionsECT is an alternative to pharmacological therapy in depression with psychotic symptoms in patients with no response to drugs. According to studies and clinical practice, ETC has been effective as we see in this case. Therefore, ECT is a technique to consider in major depression, not only in patients who do not respond to drug therapy but also in those who do not tolerate psychopharmacological, who suffer from severe or psychotic symptoms, suicide thoughts or those, psychomotor agitation or stupor.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2032-2032
Author(s):  
O. Caliyurt

Sleep deprivation therapy is a treatment option for major depressive disorder. Total sleep deprivation for one night improves depressive symptoms in 40–60% of treatments. Recent reports have suggested that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are reduced in individuals suffering major depressive disorder and these levels normalize following antidepressant treatment.In a recent study we have shown that the effects of total sleep deprivation therapy on BDNF levels in major depression. Results were compared between depressive patients that were treated with sertraline and healthy volunteers who experienced single total sleep deprivation. The baseline BDNF levels were significantly lower in both patient groups than the controls. Single sleep deprivation therapy was shown to decrease HAM-D scores and increase BDNF levels significantly in depressive patients. Effects of single sleep deprivation therapy on HAM-D scores was correlated with changes in BDNF levels. A series of three sleep deprivation therapies in a week accelerated the treatment response and increased the BDNF levels rapidly compared to the patients treated with sertraline alone. Better treatment response in the TSD group was also correlated with the statistically significant increase of BDNF levels in the 7th day compared to the sertraline group.In conclusion, our results support the BDNF reduction in major depression. Rapid antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation therapy appear to relate to the rapid BDNF increase in major depressive patients. These results give an opportunity to explore the relationship between fast antidepressant response and BDNF changes in major depression.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1273-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
CARLY COOPER ◽  
LISA JONES ◽  
EMMA DUNN ◽  
LIZ FORTY ◽  
SAYEED HAQUE ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe relationship of postnatal (postpartum) depression (PND) to episodes of depression occurring at other times is not well understood. Despite a number of studies of clinical presentation, there is little consistency in the literature. We have undertaken within- and between-individual comparisons of the clinical presentation of postnatal (PN) and non-postnatal (NPN) depressive episodes in women with recurrent depression.MethodIn a sample of well-characterized, parous women meeting DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder, the clinical presentation of episodes of major depression with onset within 4 weeks of giving birth (PND group, n=50) were compared with (i) the non-postnatal episodes of women with PND, and (ii) episodes of major depression in parous women who had not experienced episodes of mood disorder in relation to childbirth (NPND group, n=132). In addition, the non-postnatal episodes of the PND group of women were compared with the depressive episodes of the NPND group.ResultsThe small number of differences found between PN and NPN depressive episodes, such as reduced early morning wakening in postnatal episodes, are likely to be explicable by the context of having a new baby rather than by any difference in the nature of the underlying depression.ConclusionsThe results do not point to substantial differences in clinical presentation between episodes of major depression occurring in relation to childbirth and at other times. Other avenues of research are therefore required to demonstrate a specific relationship between childbirth and depression.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. VAN LONDEN ◽  
R. P. G. MOLENAAR ◽  
J. G. GOEKOOP ◽  
A. H. ZWINDERMAN ◽  
H. G. M. ROOIJMANS

Background. A Dutch cohort of predominantly out-patient DSM-III-R major depressive patients was followed for 3 to 5 years after start of treatment in a psycho-neuro-endocrinological prediction study. The study design permitted description of the course of remissions, relapses and recurrences.Methods. Pharmacological treatment was standardized, psychotherapy was tailored to the needs of the patient, follow-ups were done monthly until 3 years or more after the initial recruitment.Results. After 9 months 49% of the patients had reached full remission and 45% were in partial remission. During the following 3 to 5 years 82% of the patients had reached a period of full remission. Sixteen per cent of the patients needed 2 years or more before full remission. A relapse or recurrence rate of 41% within 5 years was found. Patients with residual symptoms relapsed particularly in the first 4 months after remission, while patients without residual symptoms recurred mainly after 12 months after remission. Previous depressive episodes and psychoticism predicted relapse. Psychomotor retardation at inception predicted a longer time to partial remission.Conclusion. In most cases, major depression is a seriously impairing episodic disease. This is also true for a sample of predominantly out-patients treated at a university clinic.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Berlin ◽  
L Givry-Steiner ◽  
Y Lecrubier ◽  
AJ Puech

SummaryAnhedonia may be considered as a transnosological feature of depression and schizophrenia. The aim of the present study was to assess hedonic responses to sucrose solutions and sweet taste perception threshold in patients with major depression and in schizophrenic patients in comparison with healthy subjects (matched for age and gender with depressive patients), and to compare these responses to evaluations by the Physical and Social Anhedonia scale of Chapman and the Pleasure Scale of Fawcett, generally used to quantify anhedonia. Hedonic responses to sucrose solutions were similar in patients with major depression (n = 20), schizophrenia (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20). Sweet taste perception threshold was significantly higher in depressive patients than in controls. Hedonic response to sucrose was inversely correlated with physical Anhedonia Scores and sweet taste perception threshold with Pleasure Scale scores. Measures of hedonia/anhedonia were not related with the intensity of depression or anxiety as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale, respectively. In 11 depressed patients hospitalised for 17 to 33 days, neither hedonic ratings to sucrose solutions, sweet taste perception threshold, Physical, Social Anhedonia scores nor Pleasure Scale scores were modified in spite of substantial decrease in MADRS or Hamilton Anxiety scores. Hedonic responses to sucrose solutions and sweet taste perception threshold may be used as complementary evaluation to quantify anhedonia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Sander ◽  
Jonathan M. Schmidt ◽  
Roland Mergl ◽  
Frank M. Schmidt ◽  
Ulrich Hegerl

1993 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinead O'brien ◽  
Patrick McKeon ◽  
Myra O'regan

Eighty patients admitted to hospital with major depression were randomly allocated to six weeks of treatment with tranylcypromine, amitriptyline, or tranylcypromine and amitriptyline in combination, in a double-blind study. Scores on the HRSD improved significantly in all three groups, but there were no differences between the three groups. Patients on tranylcypromine and amitriptyline combined improved more according to their self-ratings after six weeks, and response was earlier as measured by a clinical global improvement scale. Those with endogenous depression improved more than those with neurotic depression, irrespective of treatment group. Combined treatment was less well tolerated than single treatments and gave rise to more side-effects, although there was no serious toxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observed more frequently in patients on combined treatment. This group also experienced a significant increase in weight and prolongation of the P-R interval on ECG.


2014 ◽  
Vol 205 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Sander L. Koole ◽  
Annemiek van Dijke ◽  
Miquel Roca ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere is controversy about whether psychotherapies are effective in the treatment of subclinical depression, defined by clinically relevant depressive symptoms in the absence of a major depressive disorder.AimsTo examine whether psychotherapies are effective in reducing depressive symptoms, reduce the risk of developing major depressive disorder and have comparable effects to psychological treatment of major depression.MethodWe conducted a meta-analysis of 18 studies comparing a psychological treatment of subclinical depression with a control group.ResultsThe target groups, therapies and characteristics of the included studies differed considerably from each other, and the quality of many studies was not optimal. Psychotherapies did have a small to moderate effect on depressive symptoms against care as usual at the post-test assessment (g = 0.35, 95% CI 0.23–0.47; NNT = 5, 95% CI 4–8) and significantly reduced the incidence of major depressive episodes at 6 months (RR = 0.61) and possibly at 12 months (RR = 0.74). The effects were significantly smaller than those of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder and could be accounted for by non-specific effects of treatment.ConclusionsPsychotherapy may be effective in the treatment of subclinical depression and reduce the incidence of major depression, but more high-quality research is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document