CBT in a Group Format for Bi-Polar Affective Disorder

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne G. Palmer ◽  
Helga Williams ◽  
Malcolm Adams

The findings from this study indicate that group cognitive behavioural therapy combined with mood stabilizing medications was effective for some of the participants. Standard measures were used to monitor changes systematically and regularly. Self reports from participants suggested that they found the therapy useful and acceptable. The approach taken seems worth extending to a larger number of participants in a controlled trial, but meanwhile a detailed description of the treatment package is given, for wider dissemination of the methods.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Richard Devy ◽  
Philip Lehert ◽  
Marc Genty

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) affects quality of life (QoL). Pharmacological treatments demonstrated benefits on clinical endpoints without improving QoL. We evaluated the effects of a group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) on QoL disease progression. Methods: One-year multi-centre controlled multivariate-matched study was organised on Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 4, MS duration < 2 years, treated by interferon I? in 11 French centres. For each new patient, the two best-matching patients for age, gender, EDSS, mood, illness duration baseline variables were selected in the other centres. The self-filled Two Lives Scale (TLS)-QoL10 was used at months (M) 0-3-6-9-12-15; the post-baseline mean QoL was the endpoint. We compared CBT + I? to I? alone. The effect of disease progression on QoL was evaluated by modelling, for each visit, the effect of EDSS on QoL at later visits.Results: 19 + 32 patients were recruited. Compared to placebo, improvements of 1.10 (95%CI [0.31-1.89], p = 0.009) and 1.43*** [0.72, 2.15] were observed in the CBT group on QoL and coping scales, respectively. Coping explained 81%*** [57, 100] of the effect of CBT on QoL. QoL was negatively affected by disease progression (0.95*** [-1.21; 0.63]), whereas EDSS was influenced by QoL values (-0.10*** [-0.14; -0.06]).Conclusions: We observed a clinically significant beneficial effect of CBT on QoL, the effect of CBT essentially explained by an increase of coping, a positive influence of QoL on disease progression. QoL is both the most important target for patients and a factor of slowing disease progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document