scholarly journals Body size preferences for women and adolescent girls living in Africa: A mixed-methods systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Rebecca Pradeilles ◽  
Michelle Holdsworth ◽  
Oluwabukola Olaitan ◽  
Ana Irache ◽  
Hibbah A. Osei-Kwasi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To synthesise evidence on body size preferences for females living in Africa and the factors influencing these. Design: Mixed-methods systematic review including searches on Medline, CINHAL, ASSIA, Web of Science and PsycINFO (PROSPERO CRD42015020509). A sequential-explanatory approach was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings. Setting: Urban and rural Africa. Participants: Studies of both sexes providing data on body size preferences for adolescent girls and women aged ≥10 years. Results: 73 articles from 21 countries were included: 50 quantitative, 15 qualitative and eight mixed methods. Most studies reported a preference for normal or overweight body sizes. Some studies of adolescent girls/young women indicated a preference for underweight. Factors influencing preferences for large(r) body sizes included: socio-demographic (e.g. education, rural residency), health-related (e.g. current Body Mass Index, pubertal status), psycho-social (e.g. avoiding HIV stigma) and socio-cultural factors (e.g. spouse’s preference, social standing, cultural norms). Factors influencing preferences for slim(mer) body sizes included: socio-demographic (e.g. higher socioeconomic status, urban residency, younger age), health-related (e.g. health knowledge, being nulliparous), psycho-social (e.g. appearance, body size perception as overweight/obese), and socio-cultural factors (e.g. peer pressure, media). Conclusions: A preference for overweight (not obese) body sizes among some African females means that interventions need to account for the array of factors that maintain these preferences. The widespread preference for normal weight is positive in public health terms, but the valorisation of underweight in adolescent girls/young women may lead to an increase in body dissatisfaction. Emphasis needs to be placed on education to prevent all forms of malnutrition.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thelma Onozato ◽  
Carla Francisca dos Santos Cruz ◽  
Anny Giselly Milhome da Costa Farre ◽  
Carina Carvalho Silvestre ◽  
Rafaella de Oliveira Santos Silva ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Hamel ◽  
Madeline Pe ◽  
Corneel Coens ◽  
Francesca Martinelli ◽  
Alexander M.M. Eggermont ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Celia Karp ◽  
Caroline Moreau ◽  
Grace Sheehy ◽  
Selena Anjur-Dietrich ◽  
Faith Mbushi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e1521-e1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isolde Birdthistle ◽  
Clare Tanton ◽  
Andrew Tomita ◽  
Kristen de Graaf ◽  
Susan B Schaffnit ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mirjam C. M. van der Ende-van Loon ◽  
A. Stoker ◽  
P. T. Nieuwkerk ◽  
W. L. Curvers ◽  
E. J. Schoon

Abstract Purpose Barrett esophagus (BE) is associated with a significant decrease of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Too often, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are applied without considering what they measure and for which purposes they are suitable. With this systematic review, we provide researchers and physicians with an overview of all the instruments previously used for measuring HRQoL in BE patients and which PROMs are most appropriate from the patient’s perspective. Methods A comprehensive search was performed to identify all PROMs used for measuring HRQoL in BE patients, to identify factors influencing HRQoL according to BE patients, and to evaluate each PROM from a patients’ perspective. Results Among the 27 studies, a total of 32 different HRQoL instruments were identified. None of these instruments were designed or validated for use in BE patients. Four qualitative studies were identified exploring factors influencing HRQoL in the perceptions of BE patients. These factors included fear of cancer, anxiety, trust in physician, sense of control, uncertainty, worry, burden of endoscopy, knowledge and understanding, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleeping difficulties, diet and lifestyle, use of medication, and support of family and friends. Conclusion None of the quantitative studies measuring HRQoL in BE patients sufficiently reflected the perceptions of HRQoL in BE patients. Only gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety were addressed in the majority of the studies. For the selection of PROMs, we encourage physicians and researchers measuring HRQoL to choose their PROMs from a patient perspective and not strictly based on health professionals’ definitions of what is relevant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document