scholarly journals A comparison of two rotational stocking strategies on the foraging behaviour and herbage intake by grazing sheep

animal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 2503-2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.V. Savian ◽  
R.M.T. Schons ◽  
J.C. Mezzalira ◽  
A. Barth Neto ◽  
G.F. Da Silva Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foraging Behaviour ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Grazing Sheep

scholarly journals The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake

1986 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Mayes ◽  
C. S. Lamb ◽  
Patricia M. Colgrove
Keyword(s):  
Perennial Ryegrass ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Cyclical Pattern ◽  
Unbiased Estimates ◽  
Grazing Sheep ◽  
Supplementary Feed ◽  
Palmitic Acids

SUMMARYThe recovery in the faeces of the n-alkanes of herbage (odd-chain, C27–C35) and of dosed artificial alkanes (even-chain, C28 and C32) was studied in twelve 4-month-old castrated male lambs. The lambs received three levels of cut, fresh perennial ryegrass or a mixed diet of perennial ryegrass (0·70) and a barley-based concentrate (0·30) (500–900 g D.M./day). C28 and C32 n-alkanes (130 mg each), absorbed onto shredded paper, were given once daily for 17 days to test whether the recoveries of herbage and dosed alkanes were similar to enable their use as markers for determining the herbage intake of grazing sheep. Stearic and palmitic acids (130 mg each) were given with the dosed alkanes to half of the animals with the objective of facilitating emulsification of the dosed alkanes within the digestive tract.With the exception of C27 n-alkane, the faecal recoveries of all alkanes were unaffected by diet, feeding level or emulsifying agent. Faecal recovery of odd- chain herbage n-alkanes increased with increasing C-chain length. The recovery of the dosed C28 n-alkane was slightly greater than the recoveries of both C27, and C29 n-alkanes of herbage. The recoveries of the dosed C32 n-alkane and the herbage C33-alkane were the same.The mean herbage intake estimated using C33 and C32 n-alkanes was identical to the actual herbage intake. Other alkane pairs gave slight underestimates of herbage intake ranging from 3·5% for the C28–C29 pair to 7·6% for the C27–C28 pair. No cyclical pattern of n-alkane excretion throughout the day was observed. Examination of daily variations in faecal alkane concentrations indicated that the start of alkane dosing should precede the sampling of faeces by at least 6 days.These results suggest that accurate estimation of herbage intake in grazing sheep is possible from the simultaneous use of dosed C32 and herbage C33 n-alkanes as markers.The method may be particularly useful in enabling unbiased estimates of herbage intake to be made in animals receiving supplementary feed.

Wool production of grazing sheep supplemented with casein and formaldehyde-treated casein

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (48) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
JP Langlands
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Caseinate ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Stocking Rate ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Grazing Sheep

For 59 days grazing Merino wethers were given 0, 40, or 80 g of sodium caseinate each day directly into the abomasum. Clean wool production was increased by 35 and 38 per cent after giving 40 and 80 g per day respectively. In a second experiment grazing Merino wethers were given 0 or 80 g casein, or 40 or 80 g casein treated with formaldehyde (HCHO-casein) each day through cannulae inserted into the rumen. Wool production was increased by 22, 38, and 51 per cent by the 80 g casein, 40 g HCHO-casein and 80 g HCHO-casein treatments respectively. In a third experiment Merino wethers, in which rumen cannulae had been prepared, were grazed at a high and low stocking rate, and were given daily 0, 20, 40, or 60 g HCHO-casein through the rumen cannulae. Wool production and efficiency of wool production increased, and herbage intake declined as the level of supplementary feeding increased.

The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: The interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 755 ◽  
Author(s):  
WG Allden ◽  
IA McDWhittaker
Keyword(s):  
Plant Height ◽  
Spatial Relations ◽  
Initial Increase ◽  
Intake Rate ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Constant Rate ◽  
Herbage Yield ◽  
Grazing Sheep ◽  
Animal Size

The interrelationship of characters of the pasture (herbage yield, height of sward) and of the animal (size of animal, rate of intake, rate of biting, size of bite, and time spent grazing) which influence the consumption of herbage by the grazing sheep was examined in three short-term experiments. In one study the high correlation usually observed between herbage yield per unit of land area and plant height was disturbed by manipulating the spatial relations of the sward; it was observed that the rate of intake of pasture by grazing animals was closely associated with plant height (estimated from tiller length) there being little relation between herbage yield and intake. Size of bite increased almost linearly with changing tiller length, whereas after a small initial increase the rate of biting decreased. These differences produced a sevenfold change in the rate of herbage consumption between sheep grazing pastures of 3.7 cm tiller length (1.0 g dry matter/min) and 7.7 cm (7.1 g/min). At greater tiller lengths the size of bite and rate of biting varied inversely to maintain a constant rate of intake. When accessibility of herbage imposed limitations on the rate at which the animal was able to prehend its feed, it was shown that the sheep was able partially to compensate for the reduced amount of herbage present by an increase in grazing time (from 6 to 13 hr/day). However, as the animal extended its period of grazing the compensation became progressively more incomplete. Under sparse pasture conditions lambs were able to consume feed at a significantly greater rate than yearlings but as pasture availability increased the situation was reversed. The role of short-term grazing studies in relation to problems of grazing management is discussed.

Spray-topping annual grass pasture with glyphosate to delay loss of feeding value during summer. IV. Diet composition, herbage intake, and performance in grazing sheep

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 487 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Leury ◽  
C. Siever-Kelly ◽  
R. J. Simpson ◽  
K. L. Gatford ◽  
H. Dove
Keyword(s):  
Diet Composition ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrate ◽  
Sheep Grazing ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Plant Parts ◽  
Seed Head ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Grazing Sheep ◽  
Days After Anthesis

We report the effects of spray-topping annual grass pasture with glyphosate (180 g a.i./ha as Roundup CT, at the seed head emergence stage) on the nutritive value of herbage and on subsequent performance of grazing sheep. Eight 1-ha plots, consisting of 4 sprayed and 4 unsprayed (control) plots, were set-stocked with Merino wethers (18 months old, 12 sheep/ha) from 8 days after anthesis in the control plots (late spring) until 165 days after anthesis (mid-autumn). In 4 periods (15–20, 36–41, 71–76, and 99–104 days after anthesis; Periods 1–4, respectively) sheep were dosed with synthetic alkanes and herbage and faecal samples were taken, in order to estimate diet composition (in terms of plant parts), faecal output, herbage intake, and the digestibility of the whole diet. As described in our earlier papers, spray-topping reduced the yield of pasture dry matter, but also slowed the loss of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and digestibility during pasture senescence. The present paper shows that as a result, sheep grazing sprayed herbage in Periods 1 and 2 consumed significantly more organic matter (OM) and digestible OM (DOM) than sheep grazing the control pasture. Their diet contained a higher proportion of stem with a higher WSC concentration than that of the sheep grazing the control plots. The proportions of different plant parts (leaf blade+sheath, stem, seed head) in the diet of both the plot sheep and oesophageally fistulated (OF) sheep, which grazed treatments for short periods, differed significantly between treatments in all periods. However, the compositions of the diets selected by plot and OF sheep were similar. These results confirmed diet preferences measured using housed sheep and demonstrate the usefulness of alkane-based procedures for quantifying diet composition and intake in grazing animals. As a result of their higher intake of DOM, sheep grazing sprayed herbage had a significantly higher liveweight gain over the first 2 periods (40 g/day). In Period 3, sheep grazing sprayed herbage consumed more OM than sheep grazing control herbage. However, DOM intakes from sprayed or control plots were not significantly different in either Period 3 or Period 4, and were lower than in Periods 1 and 2. Sheep grazing both treatments lost liveweight at a similar rate over this time. Wool growth in sheep grazing sprayed herbage was improved by 10% during the experimental period; wool strength was also improved significantly. The implications for the management of sheep grazing spray-topped pastures over summer are discussed.

Herbage intake of grazing sheep in South-western Australia

1959 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
HE Fels ◽  
RJ Moir ◽  
RC Rossiter
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Subterranean Clover ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Common Belief ◽  
Local Regression ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Faecal Nitrogen ◽  
Grazing Sheep ◽  
Clover Pasture

Estimates of the intake of pasture organic matter by grazing sheep were made for two types of pasture, clover-dominant and grass-dominant, at three growth stages. These estimates were made from faecal nitrogen index equations which were derived from data on penned sheep. One of the equations was found to be remarkably close to Lanoaster's (1954) regression of feed/faeces ratio on percentage faecal nitrogen content. The dry mature clover pasture was anomalous, and a separate "local" regression was derived for it. Organic matter intakes for grazing sheep of about 110 lb body weight ranged from 900 to 1300 g/day, except on dry clover pasture, where the intake was only about 700 g/day. Contrary to common belief, subterranean clover was eaten at least as readily as grass during the growing season. Evidence is presented that sheep grazing on pastures with a total nitrogen content of 2 . 5 per cent. or less select material of higher than average nitrogen content, whereas if the nitrogen content of the pasture exceeds 3.5 per cent. there is no such selection. The anomalous characteristics of the dry mature clover are discussed in some detail, and further evidence is given suggesting that the material was of poorer digestibility than usual.

The calculation of herbage intake of grazing sheep: A detailed comparison between models

1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Michel Elsen ◽  
Daniel Wallach ◽  
Jean Louis Charpenteau
Keyword(s):  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Herbage Intake ◽  
Grazing Sheep

Individual differences in sociability and their consequences for foraging behaviour in sheep

2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 ◽  
pp. 129-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Sibbald ◽  
D.J.F. Smith ◽  
R.J. Hooper
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Social Behaviour ◽  
Foraging Behaviour ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Nearest Neighbours ◽  
Grazing Sheep

The spatial distribution of grazing sheep is influenced by the distribution of vegetation and by social behaviour. Where there are conflicts between grazing preferred vegetation and maintaining normal inter-individual distances, animals may have to make trade-offs based on the relative strengths of their motivation to feed or to be social. Social motivation, or sociability, has been assessed in chickens by measuring the rate at which isolated individuals move towards their companions (Suarez and Gallup, 1983) and in sheep by studying nearest neighbours (Sibbald et al, 1998). The aim of this experiment was to test whether individual differences in sociability affect the foraging behaviour of sheep, when animals have to choose between grazing or remaining close to their companions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document