A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes from oocyte donation

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Adams ◽  
R. A. Clark ◽  
M. J. Davies ◽  
S. de Lacey
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oocyte Donation ◽  
Donor Oocyte ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Weight Outcomes

Donated oocytes are a treatment modality for female infertility which is also associated with increased risks of preeclampsia. Subsequently it is important to evaluate if there is concomitant increased risks for adverse neonatal events in donated oocyte neonates. A structured search of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews was performed to investigate the perinatal health outcomes of offspring conceived from donor oocytes compared with autologous oocytes. Meta-analysis was performed on comparable outcomes data. Twenty-eight studies were eligible and included in the review, and of these, 23 were included in a meta-analysis. Donor oocyte neonates are at increased risk of being born with low birth weight (<2500 g) [risk ratio (RR): 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–1.22, P-value (P)<0.00001], very low birth weight (<1500 g) (RR: 1.24, CI: 1.15–1.35, P<0.00001), preterm (<37 weeks) (RR: 1.26, CI: 1.23–1.30, P<0.00001), of lower gestational age (mean difference −0.3 weeks, CI: −0.35 weeks to −0.25 weeks, P<0.00001), and preterm with low birth weight (RR: 1.24, CI: 1.19–1.29, P<0.00001), when compared with autologous oocyte neonates. Conversely, low birth weight outcomes were improved in term donor oocyte neonates (RR: 0.86, CI: 0.8–0.93, P=0.0003). These negative outcomes remained significant when controlling for multiple deliveries. The donor oocyte risk rates are higher than those found in general ART outcomes, are important considerations for the counselling of infertile patients and may also influence the long term health of the offspring.

Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
HELEN HARRISON
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Weight Outcomes ◽  
Term Evaluation

To the Editor.— The authors of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on neonatal care1 found "important" variations among neonatal intensive care units in philosophies of treatment, methods of treatment, and short-term outcomes. In a recent meta-analysis of follow-up studies,2 researchers document a similarly haphazard approach to the long-term evaluation of very low birth weight survivors. Until randomized controlled clinical trials validate the safety and efficacy of neonatal therapies, and until long-term outcomes are assessed accurately, the treatment of very low birth weight infants should be declared experimental.

A meta-analysis of sperm donation offspring health outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Adams ◽  
R. A. Clark ◽  
M. J. Davies ◽  
S. de Lacey
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Male Infertility ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sperm Donation ◽  
Donor Sperm ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Offspring Health

Although the use of donor sperm as a treatment modality for male infertility has become common place, the health outcomes for those conceived has been poorly studied. A structured search of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews was performed to investigate the health outcomes of offspring conceived from donor sperm. Eight studies were eligible and included in the review, and of these, three were included in a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes showed that donor sperm neonates are not at increased risk of being born of low birth weight (<2500 g), preterm (<37 weeks) or with increased incidences of birth defects, than spontaneously conceived neonates.

Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
WILLIAM TARNOW-MORDI ◽  
ANDREW WILKINSON
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Severity Of Disease ◽  
Weight Outcomes ◽  
Initial Severity

To the Editor.— In their valuable report1 Dr Hack and colleagues confirm large variations between centers in the perinatal histories, treatment, and outcomes of very low birth weight infants. Unfortunately, in contrast to earlier reports,2,3 they neglect to mention the need for measures of initial disease severity. This is an important omission. In a survey of nine pediatric intensive care centers Pollack et al4 showed that hospital mortality varied from 3.6% to 17%. This large variation was explained completely by differences between hospital populations in initial severity of disease, calculated from routine indices of physiologic stability on the day of admission.

scholarly journals Clinical profile and factors determining outcome of intramural very low birth weight babies in a tertiary care centre: a retrospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Devi Meenakshi K. ◽  
Arasar Seeralar A. T. ◽  
Srinivasan Padmanaban
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
P Value ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Very low birth weight (VLBW) babies are at increased risk of a number of complications both immediate and late. Worldwide it has been observed that these babies contribute to a significant extent to neonatal mortality and morbidity. Aim of the study was to study the risk factors contributing to mortality in VLBW babies and to evaluate the morbidity pattern in these infants.Methods: A retrospective analysis of data retrieved from the case records of VLBW babies admitted in the NICU of Kilpauk Medical College between January 2015 to December 2015. Out of the 2360 intramural babies admitted during the study period, 99 babies were less than 1500 gms. The risk factors for these babies were analyzed for their association with the outcome. Data were statistically analyzed.Results: In present study, we found that sex of the baby, gestational age, obstetric score, birth asphyxia, pulmonary haemorrhage, ROP and presence of shock were found to be associated with increased mortality. By logistic regression analysis it was observed that birth weight of the baby (p value 0.002), duration of stay (p value 0.0006), presence of shock (p<0.0001), were the risk factors significantly associated with poor outcome.Conclusions: Among the maternal and neonatal factors analyzed in the study using logistic regression analysis, birth weight, duration of hospital stay and presence of shock were significantly related to poor outcome. Of these presence of shock was the single most important factor that predicted increased mortality.

Neonatology—Science or Art?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 880-880
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Exact Science ◽  
Weight Outcomes

To the Editor.— The authors of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research network report1 of very low birth weight outcomes deserve a lot of praise for providing a survey of neonatal practices. But they are much too polite. In the discussion of "important intercenter variation as well as differences in the philosophy of care," the authors mildly note, "the practice of neonatal medicine remains in part an art rather than an exact science."

Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Hack ◽  
Jeffrey D. Horbar ◽  
Michael H. Malloy ◽  
Linda Wright ◽  
Jon E. Tyson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Ductus Arteriosus ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Weight Outcomes

This report describes the neonatal outcomes of 1765 very low birth weight (&lt;1500 g) infants delivered from November 1987 through October 1988 at the seven participating centers of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Intensive Care Network. Survival was 34% at &lt;751 g birth weight (range between centers 20% to 55%), 66% at 751 through 1000 g (range 42% to 75%), 87% at 1001 through 1250 g (range 84% to 91%), and 93% at 1251 through 1500 g (range 89% to 98%). By obstetric measures of gestation, survival was 23% at 23 weeks (range 0% to 33%), 34% at 24 weeks (range 10% to 57%), and 54% at 25 weeks (range 30% to 72%). Neonatal morbidity included respiratory distress (67%), symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (25%), necrotizing enterocolitis (6%), septicemia (17%), meningitis (2%), urinary tract infection (4%), and intraventricular hemorrhage (45%, 18% grade III and IV). Morbidity increased with decreasing birth weight. Oxygen was administered for ≥28 days to 79% of &lt;751-g birth weight infants (range between centers 67% to 100%), 45% of 751-through 1000-g infants (range 20% to 68%), and 13% of 1001- through 1500-g infants (range 5% to 23%). Ventilator support for ≥28 days was given to 68% of infants at &lt;751 g, 29% at 751 through 1000 g, and 4% at &gt;1000 g. Hospital stay was 59 days for survivors vs 15 days for infants who died. Sixty-nine percent of survivors had subnormal (&lt;10th percentile) weight at discharge. The data demonstrate important intercenter variation of current neonatal outcomes, as well as differences in philosophy of care and definition and prevalence of morbidity.

Low birth weight, very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight in African children aged between 0 and 5 years old: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Tchamo ◽  
A. Prista ◽  
C. G. Leandro
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcome ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Extremely Low Birth Weight ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
African Children ◽  
Increased Risk

Low birth weight (LBW<2500), very low birth weight (VLBW<1500), extremely low birth weight (ELBW<1500) infants are at high risk for growth failure that result in delayed development. Africa is a continent that presents high rates of children born with LBW, VLBW and ELBW particularly sub-Saharan Africa. To review the existing literature that explores the repercussions of LBW, VLBW and ELBW on growth, neurodevelopmental outcome and mortality in African children aged 0–5 years old. A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles using Academic Search Complete in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus and Scholar Google. Quantitatives studies that investigated the association between LBW, VLBW, ELBW with growth, neurodevelopmental outcome and mortality, published between 2008 and 2015 were included. African studies with humans were eligible for inclusion. From the total of 2205 articles, 12 articles were identified as relevant and were subsequently reviewed in full version. Significant associations were found between LBW, VLBW and ELBW with growth, neurodevelopmental outcome and mortality. Surviving VLBW and ELBW showed increased risk of death, growth retardation and delayed neurodevelopment. Post-neonatal interventions need to be carried out in order to minimize the short-term effects of VLBW and ELBW.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document