The Effect of Ballot Characteristics on the Likelihood of Voting Errors

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Bernardo ◽  
Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz ◽  
Gretchen A. Macht
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Scanner Data ◽  
Electoral Process ◽  
Analytical Technique ◽  
Election Results ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

Abstract In the United States, people are asked to vote on a myriad of candidates, offices, and ballot questions. The result is lengthy ballots that are time intensive and complicated to fill out. In this paper, we utilize a new analytical technique harnessing ballot scanner data from a statewide midterm election to estimate the effects of ballot complexity on voting errors. We find that increases in ballot length, increases in the number of local ballot questions, and increases in the number of candidates listed for single offices significantly increase the odds of encountering ballot marking and scanning errors. Our findings indicate that ballots’ characteristics can help election administrators make Election Day planning and resource allocation decisions that decrease ballot errors and associated wait times to vote while increasing the reliability of election results and voter confidence in the electoral process.

Resource Allocation, Health Policy, and Rationing Craniofacial Care

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Ronald P. Strauss
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Social Programs ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

The United States allocates health care without an overt system of rationing. This article analyzes the forces that guide resource allocation to craniofacial care. Various possible allocation systems are reviewed for how decision makers might evaluate proposed programs for legislative funding. Using a case-based exercise, readers are asked to weigh the potential costs and benefits of six health and social programs. These programs are also systematically examined for factors that are likely to affect resource allocation decisions. Eleven factors that affect decision-making are utilized in the analysis, ranging from the cost per client, to emotional or human interest content, of the proposed programs. Decisions about preventive programs are compared with those involving therapeutic programs. The allocation of resources to craniofacial programs, including those for children with rare major craniofacial conditions, is considered in the context of social justice and broad contemporary ethical and health care delivery issues.

Mother or Wife?

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phia S. Salter ◽  
Glenn Adams
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Cultural Psychology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Personal Relationship ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Church Membership ◽  
Cultural Dynamics ◽  
Psychology Perspective ◽  
Cultural Ecological

Inspired by “Mother or Wife” African dilemma tales, the present research utilizes a cultural psychology perspective to explore the dynamic, mutual constitution of personal relationship tendencies and cultural-ecological affordances for neoliberal subjectivity and abstracted independence. We administered a resource allocation task in Ghana and the United States to assess the prioritization of conjugal/nuclear relationships over consanguine/kin relationships along three dimensions of sociocultural variation: nation (American and Ghanaian), residence (urban and rural), and church membership (Pentecostal Charismatic and Traditional Western Mission). Results show that tendencies to prioritize nuclear over kin relationships – especially spouses over parents – were greater among participants in the first compared to the second of each pair. Discussion considers issues for a cultural psychology of cultural dynamics.

Unexpected Consequences: The Effects on Non-Accelerated Filers of an Accelerated Filing Deadline and SOX Section 404

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-112
Author(s):  
Bei Dong ◽  
Stefanie L. Tate ◽  
Le Emily Xu
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Jel Classifications ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

SYNOPSIS Regulations implemented by the SEC in 2003 and 2004 simultaneously shortened the financial statement filing deadlines and increased the time required for both the preparation of financial statements and the related audit of accelerated filers (AFs). However, there were indirect, unintended negative consequences for companies not subject to the regulations, namely, non-accelerated filers (NAFs). The new regulations imposed strains on auditor resources requiring auditors to make resource allocation decisions that negatively affected NAFs. We find that NAFs with an auditor who had a high proportion of AF clients (high-AF) had longer audit delays after the regulations were implemented than NAFs of an auditor with a low proportion of AF clients (low-AF). Further, we document that NAFs with high-AF auditors were more likely to change auditors than NAFs with low-AF auditors. Finally, NAFs that switched to auditors with less AFs experienced shorter audit delays after the auditor change. JEL Classifications: M42; M48.

scholarly journals Balancing scarce hospital resources during the COVID-19 pandemic using discrete-event simulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Melman ◽  
A.K. Parlikad ◽  
E.A.B. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Discrete Event Simulation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Discrete Event ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Event Simulation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Allocation Strategies ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

AbstractCOVID-19 has disrupted healthcare operations and resulted in large-scale cancellations of elective surgery. Hospitals throughout the world made life-altering resource allocation decisions and prioritised the care of COVID-19 patients. Without effective models to evaluate resource allocation strategies encompassing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 care, hospitals face the risk of making sub-optimal local resource allocation decisions. A discrete-event-simulation model is proposed in this paper to describe COVID-19, elective surgery, and emergency surgery patient flows. COVID-19-specific patient flows and a surgical patient flow network were constructed based on data of 475 COVID-19 patients and 28,831 non-COVID-19 patients in Addenbrooke’s hospital in the UK. The model enabled the evaluation of three resource allocation strategies, for two COVID-19 wave scenarios: proactive cancellation of elective surgery, reactive cancellation of elective surgery, and ring-fencing operating theatre capacity. The results suggest that a ring-fencing strategy outperforms the other strategies, regardless of the COVID-19 scenario, in terms of total direct deaths and the number of surgeries performed. However, this does come at the cost of 50% more critical care rejections. In terms of aggregate hospital performance, a reactive cancellation strategy prioritising COVID-19 is no longer favourable if more than 7.3% of elective surgeries can be considered life-saving. Additionally, the model demonstrates the impact of timely hospital preparation and staff availability, on the ability to treat patients during a pandemic. The model can aid hospitals worldwide during pandemics and disasters, to evaluate their resource allocation strategies and identify the effect of redefining the prioritisation of patients.

A Common Approach to Risk Analysis Methodology

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Robert Sims
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Analysis Methodology ◽  
Risk Ranking ◽  
Homeland Defense ◽  
Narrow Area ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

Risk analysis has been used extensively to inform decisions throughout government and industry for many years. Many methodologies have been developed to perform these analyses, resulting in differences in terminology and approach that make it difficult to compare the results of an analysis in one field to that in another. In particular, many approaches result only in a risk ranking within a narrow area or field of interest, so the results cannot be compared to rankings in other areas or fields. However, dealing with terrorist threats requires prioritizing the allocation of homeland defense resources across a broad spectrum of possible targets. Therefore, a common approach is needed to allow comparison of risks. This presentation summarizes an approach that will allow the results of risk analyses based on using current methodologies to be expressed in a common format with common terminology to facilitate resource allocation decisions.

Legal basis of «democracy»

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Polischuk
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bill Of Rights ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Founding Fathers ◽  
Political Events ◽  
Capitol Hill ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Constitution ◽  
Election Results

The article examines the main political events that took place in the United States from the controversial election results to the tragic events on Capitol Hill for Trump supporters, which led to human casualties, finally untied the hands of the Democrats and allowed them to bury all the democratic values that America has taught the whole world since the adoption of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights by the founding fathers of the state.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document