Phase diagram of the lead-tin system by differential thermal analysis

1978 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis

Mechanical Properties, Electrical Conductivity and Differential Thermal Analysis of Lithium Sulphate with Small Quantities of Potassium Sulphate

1967 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1177-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt Augustsson ◽  
Arnold Kvist
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Electrical Conductivity ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
Potassium Sulphate ◽  
Lithium Sulphate ◽  
New Phase

Previously obtained conductivity and viscosity results for the system (Li,K)2SO4 with less than 3 mole% K2SO4 show bad agreement with the phase diagram given in the literature. From conductivity, viscosity and differential thermal analysis we have constructed a new phase diagram for these concentrations.

Growth, Optical Adsorption and Resistivity of (Ga0.6In0.4)2Se3 and (Ga0.594In0.396Er0.01)2Se3 Single Crystals

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Inna A. Ivashchenko ◽  
Volodumur V. Halyan ◽  
Irina V. Danylyuk ◽  
Volodumur Z. Pankevuch ◽  
Georgij Y. Davydyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
Band Gap ◽  
Single Crystals ◽  
Optical Band Gap ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Vertical Bridgman ◽  
Xrd Method

The phase diagram of the Ga2Se3–In2Se3 system was investigated by differential-thermal analysis (DTA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) method. The single crystals from the area of existence of the γ2 phase with the compositions (Ga0.6In0.4)2Se3 and (Ga0.594In0.396Er0.01)2Se3 were grown by a vertical Bridgman method. Absorption spectra of the grown crystals were studied. The estimated optical band gap is 1.95±0. 01 eV. The resistance of the single crystals of (Ga0.6In0.4)2Se3 (R=500 MΩ) and (Ga0.594In0.396Er0.01)2Se3 (R=210 MΩ) was measured.

Phase studies on the iron–selenium system

1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1171-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Dutrizac ◽  
M. B. I. Janjua ◽  
J. M. Toguri
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Liquid Region ◽  
Consolute Temperature ◽  
Liquid Sampling

The quasi-reduced iron–selenium phase diagram has been determined by a combination of differential thermal analysis, visual polythermal, and liquid sampling techniques. Iron and selenium form two compounds: FeSe2 with a broad stoichiometry range and FeSe2 with a much narrower composition field. The former compound was found to melt congruently at 1070 °C and 53.5 atomic % selenium, while the latter melted incongruently at 585 °C. Two liquid–liquid regions were observed in this system. One occurred above 790 °C from 73.9 atomic % selenium to about 99.92% selenium with a consolute temperature of 1070 °C at approximately 93 atomic % selenium. The other liquid–liquid region extends upwards from 1520 °C and lies between 3 and 39.5 atomic % selenium.

scholarly journals PHYSICO-CHEMICAL INTERACTION OF THE COPPER AND ANTIMONY IODIDES

2021 ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
P.R. Mammadli ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
Chemical Interaction ◽  
Equilibrium Temperature ◽  
Polymorphic Transformations ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Immiscibility Region ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
Concentration Interval

The character of the mutual interaction of the components in the CuI-SbI3 system was studied by differential thermal analysis and X-ray phase analysis methods and its phase diagram was constructed. It was found that the system is quasi-binary and forms a monotectic phase diagram. The immiscibility region covers ~15-93 mol% SbI3 concentration interval at the monotectic equilibrium temperature (~ 4930С). The temperatures of polymorphic transformations of the CuI compound in the system drop slightly and these phase transitions take place by metatectic reactions

Study on the ZnSe phase diagram by differential thermal analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 165 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Okada ◽  
Takao Kawanaka ◽  
Seiichiro Ohmoto
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis

Revised phase diagram for the Nd–Pt system from 35 to 85 at% platinum

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. F. Xu ◽  
Z. F. Gu ◽  
G. Cheng ◽  
H. Y. Zhou ◽  
Z. M. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
Binary System ◽  
Homogeneity Range ◽  
Low Temperatures ◽  
Polymorphic Transformation ◽  
Structure Type ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray

The phase diagram of the Nd–Pt system from 35 to 85 at%Pt has been revised using X-ray diffraction and differential thermal analysis. It is found that the Nd3Pt4phase with the rhombohedral Pd4Pu3structure type is unstable and decomposes into the two neighboring phases NdPt and NdPt2at temperatures ranging approximately from 583 to 1123 K. It is confirmed that the homogeneity range for the Laves phase NdPt2extends from about 68.5 to 75.3 at%Pt in the Nd–Pt binary system. The polymorphic transformation temperature of α-NdPt ⇌ β-NdPt is about 623 K, where the α-NdPt phase with BFe type is stable at low temperatures and the β-NdPt phase with BCr type at high temperatures.

Phase Diagram Studies on the Al- Ni System

1987 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1327-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hilpert ◽  
D. Kobertz ◽  
V. Venugopal ◽  
M. Miller ◽  
H. Gerads ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Diagram ◽  
Differential Thermal Analysis ◽  
Phase Boundaries ◽  
Knudsen Effusion ◽  
Temperature Range ◽  
Knudsen Effusion Mass Spectrometry

The Al-Ni phase diagram has been investigated in the com position range xNi = 0.70 to 0.97. Phase boundaries were determined by using differential thermal analysis and Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry. The measurements were carried out in the temperature range between 1409 and 1730K. An Al-Ni phase diagram is obtained for xNi ≧ 0.70 by combining the data from this work with selected data from the literature. This diagram deviates from that recommended by phase diagram compilations and used generally in the literature to date; it agrees reasonably well with a diagram which has been rejected in the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document