An Adjusted Two‐Leaf Light Use Efficiency Model for Improving GPP Simulations Over Mountainous Areas

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyao Xie ◽  
Ainong Li
2016 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 702-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenping Yuan ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Jiangzhou Xia ◽  
Wenjie Dong ◽  
Vincenzo Magliulo ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 999-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Horn ◽  
K. Schulz

Abstract. Non-stationary and non-linear dynamic time series analysis tools are applied to multi-annual eddy covariance and micrometeorological data from 44 FLUXNET sites to derive a light use efficiency model for gross primary production on a daily basis. The extracted typical behaviour of the canopies in response to meteorological forcing leads to a model formulation allowing for a variable influence of the environmental drivers temperature and moisture availability modulating the light use efficiency. Thereby, the model is applicable to a broad range of vegetation types and climatic conditions. The proposed model explains large proportions of the variation of the gross carbon uptake at the study sites while the optimized set of six parameters is well defined. With the parameters showing explainable and meaningful relations to site-specific environmental conditions, the model has the potential to serve as basis for general regionalization strategies for large scale carbon flux predictions.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirco Boschetti ◽  
Emanuela Mauri ◽  
Chiara Gadda ◽  
Lorenzo Busetto ◽  
Roberto Confalonieri ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4091-4106
Author(s):  
Jinxuan Chen ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Julia Marshall ◽  
Kai Uwe Totsche

Abstract. Forecasting atmospheric CO2 concentrations on synoptic timescales (∼ days) can benefit the planning of field campaigns by better predicting the location of important gradients. One aspect of this, accurately predicting the day-to-day variation in biospheric fluxes, poses a major challenge. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using a diagnostic light-use-efficiency model, the Vegetation Photosynthesis Respiration Model (VPRM), to forecast biospheric CO2 fluxes on the timescale of a few days. As input, the VPRM model requires downward shortwave radiation, 2 m temperature, and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and land surface water index (LSWI), both of which are calculated from MODIS reflectance measurements. Flux forecasts were performed by extrapolating the model input into the future, i.e., using downward shortwave radiation and temperature from a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model, as well as extrapolating the MODIS indices to calculate future biospheric CO2 fluxes with VPRM. A hindcast for biospheric CO2 fluxes in Europe in 2014 has been done and compared to eddy covariance flux measurements to assess the uncertainty from different aspects of the forecasting system. In total the range-normalized mean absolute error (normalized) of the 5 d flux forecast at daily timescales is 7.1 %, while the error for the model itself is 15.9 %. The largest forecast error source comes from the meteorological data, in which error from shortwave radiation contributes slightly more than the error from air temperature. The error contribution from all error sources is similar at each flux observation site and is not significantly dependent on vegetation type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document