Gender similarities.

Author(s):  
Janet Shibley Hyde
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Shibley Hyde
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna Carpenter ◽  
Erick Janssen ◽  
Cynthia Graham ◽  
Harrie Vorst ◽  
Jelte Wicherts

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azam Baheiraei ◽  
Farzaneh Soltani ◽  
Abbas Ebadi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Cheraghi ◽  
Abbas Rahimi Foroushani

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105
Author(s):  
Nils Vikander ◽  
Tor Solbakken ◽  
Margarita Vikander

The propose of the study was to investigate gender patterns in psychological/behavioral characteristics of elite Cross County skiers. Twentyeight athletes who won medals in Olympic Games or World Championships were accessed using the Behavior Inventories for Cross County Skiers (Rushall and Vikander, 1987). Nine clusters common to both men and women were identified as: relationship with other athletes; relationship with the coach; relationship to significant others; training factors; pre-competition factors; competition factors; reactions to things that go wrong; considerations about the sport, and things champions like about cross country skiing. With this inquiry we have uncovered both gender similarities and differences among the world’s foremost cross country skiers in psychological dimensions as well as in the behavioral arena.


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon J. Walker ◽  
Thomas D. Hinch ◽  
A. J. Weighill

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dengate ◽  
Annemieke Farenhorst ◽  
Tracey Peter

The university reward structure has traditionally placed greater value on individual research excellence for tenure and promotion, influencing faculty’s allocation of time and definition of worthwhile labour. We find gender differences in Canadian natural sciences and engineering faculty’s opinions of the traditional criteria for measuring academic success that are consistent with an implicit gender bias devaluing service and teamwork. Most women recommend significant changes to the traditional model and its foundation, while a substantial minority of men support the status quo. However, this comparative qualitative analysis finds more cross-gender similarities than differences, as most men also want a more modern definition of success, perceiving the traditional model to be disproportionately supportive of one type of narrow research scholarship that does not align with the realities of most faculty’s efforts. Thus, this study suggests a discrepancy between traditional success criteria and faculty’s understanding of worthwhile labour.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer ◽  
Agustín Vallejo ◽  
Francisco Cantú

Abstract Are women disproportionately more likely than men to have family ties in politics? We study this question in Latin America, where legacies have been historically common, and we focus specifically on legislatures, where women's representation has increased dramatically in many countries. We hypothesize that, counter to conventional wisdom, women should be no more likely than men to have ties to political families. However, this may vary across legislatures with and without gender quotas. Our empirical analysis uses data from the Parliamentary Elites of Latin America survey. We find more gender similarities than differences in legislators’ patterns of family ties both today and over the past 20 years. We also find that women are more likely to have family ties than men in legislatures without gender quotas, whereas this difference disappears in legislatures with quotas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document