Extremely selective attention: Eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1196-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Blair ◽  
Marcus R. Watson ◽  
R. Calen Walshe ◽  
Fillip Maj
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 467-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoumeh Mahmoodi-Aghdam ◽  
Mohsen Dehghani ◽  
Mehrnoosh Ahmadi ◽  
Anahita Khorrami Banaraki ◽  
Ali Khatibi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-377
Author(s):  
Howard Egeth

Pylyshyn's argument is very similar to one made in the 1960s to the effect that vision may be influenced by spatial selective attention being directed to distinctive stimulus features, but not by mental set for meaning or membership in an ill-defined category. More recent work points to a special role for spatial attention in determining the contents of perception.


Author(s):  
Rico Fischer ◽  
Franziska Plessow ◽  
Andrea Kiesel

Irrelevant tone (accessory) stimuli facilitate performance in simple and choice reaction time tasks. In the present study, we combined accessory stimulation with a selective attention paradigm in order to investigate its influence on mechanisms of response selection. In the framework of a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task (Simon task), we tested whether accessory stimuli selectively affect bottom up triggered response activation processes (e.g., direct route processing), processing of task-relevant stimulus features (indirect route processing), or both/none. Results suggest a two-component effect of accessory stimuli within this selective attention task. First, accessory stimuli increased the Simon effect due to beneficial direct route processing. Second, accessory stimuli generally decreased reaction times indicating facilitation of indirect route processing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1238-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Kellough ◽  
Christopher G. Beevers ◽  
Alissa J. Ellis ◽  
Tony T. Wells

1980 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Caudrey ◽  
K. Kirk ◽  
P. C. Thomas ◽  
K. O. Ng

SummaryThe perception by schizophrenic patients of stimuli with more than one feature (dimension) was investigated using psychiatric and non-psychiatric control groups. Indices of the ability (a) to make use of redundant stimulus cues, (b) to ‘screen out’ or filter irrelevant stimulus features, and (c) to scan the perceptual field for relevant stimulus features, indicated that only filtering was consistently poor in schizophrenia. It has been suggested that the schizophrenic patient may tend to perceive his environment in an undifferentiated holistic manner rather than in an analytic manner and the implication for the theory of left hemisphere pathology in schizophrenia is discussed. However, the performance of the schizophrenic subjects did not differ significantly from that of the group of depressed patients, which suggests that the selective attention deficits previously observed in schizophrenia are not specific to the disorder.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb Prichard ◽  
Andrew Atkins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document