Nonlinear effects of team tenure on team psychological safety climate and climate strength: Implications for average team member performance.

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 940-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Koopmann ◽  
Klodiana Lanaj ◽  
Mo Wang ◽  
Le Zhou ◽  
Junqi Shi
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yejun Zhang ◽  
Min (Maggie) Wan

Purpose Psychological safety climate has been commonly conceptualized as a facilitative team property. Despite the literature review and meta-analysis conducted recently, little is known about the potential dark side of psychological safety climate. The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework to advance our understanding of both the bright and dark sides of psychological safety. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on extant theories and previous literature, the authors propose a conceptual framework of the mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying the relationship between psychological safety climate and dysfunctional team behavior. Findings The authors propose that the relationship between psychological safety climate and dysfunctional behaviors in the team is directly contingent on psychological safety climate strength, and indirectly contingent on task interdependence, group faultlines, group conflict asymmetry and team power distance differentiation. Originality/value First, the authors attempt to expand psychological safety climate literature by considering its potential damaging outcomes. Second, they contribute to the theory of psychological safety climate by suggesting a theoretical model consisting of the boundary conditions wherein psychological safety climate could reduce team effectiveness. Finally, the authors incorporate climate strength into the psychological safety literature to probe the antecedents of psychological safety climate strength and when it matters to the subsequent negative outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Afsharian ◽  
Amy Zadow ◽  
Maureen F. Dollard ◽  
Christian Dormann ◽  
Tahereh Ziaian

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Sebo ◽  
Ling Liang Dong ◽  
Nicholas Chang ◽  
Michal Lewkowicz ◽  
Michael Schutzman ◽  
...  

As teams of people increasingly incorporate robot members, it is essential to consider how a robot's actions may influence the team's social dynamics and interactions. In this work, we investigated the effects of verbal support from a robot (e.g., “good idea Salim,” “yeah”) on human team members' interactions related to psychological safety and inclusion. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 39 groups, 117 participants) where the robot team member either (A) gave verbal support or (B) did not give verbal support to the human team members of a human-robot team comprised of 2 human ingroup members, 1 human outgroup member, and 1 robot. We found that targeted support from the robot (e.g., “good idea George”) had a positive effect on outgroup members, who increased their verbal participation after receiving targeted support from the robot. When comparing groups that did and did not have verbal support from the robot, we found that outgroup members received fewer verbal backchannels from ingroup members if their group had robot verbal support. These results suggest that verbal support from a robot may have some direct benefits to outgroup members but may also reduce the obligation ingroup members feel to support the verbal contributions of outgroup members.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-368
Author(s):  
Timothy R Moake ◽  
Nahyun Oh ◽  
Clarissa R Steele

Indigenous cultural nuances such as age-related hierarchies in South Korea have the potential to impact workers’ engagement in innovation-related behaviors (IRBs). We use self-categorization theory to examine both the relationship between employee age and IRBs and the cross-level interaction effects of team psychological safety climate. Using a multilevel sample of 282 South Korean employees working in 65 teams across 45 different organizations in various industries, we find that team psychological safety climate moderates the relationship between age and engaging in IRBs. More specifically, we find that when teams have a weaker psychological safety climate, age is positively related to engaging in IRBs. However, when teams have a stronger psychological safety climate, age is not related to engaging in IRBs. We discuss the implications of these findings for innovation and managing work teams in Eastern contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document