Evaluation: New accountability system in the works

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1356336X2110031
Author(s):  
Tan Zhang

The purpose of this study was to reveal the work life of physical educators who were experiencing a teacher accountability system in the US. A combination of stratified and purposeful sampling procedures was adopted to select a sample of schools that served communities with various socioeconomic backgrounds. The schools were recently incorporated in a state teacher accountability system that used student learning growth for teacher evaluation. A group of 51 certified physical educators was selected from the sampled schools. Data were collected from three sources: an online survey, in-school observations, and semi-structured interviews. The survey and observations cross-validated data related to job description, workload, general working environment, and demographic information. The interviews detailed the teachers’ accounts about their work life, perceptions of the job demands, and resources under the teacher accountability system. Inductive analysis revealed that the lack of critical job resources, especially curricular supports, equipment, and professional development, limited the teachers from promoting student learning that the teacher accountability system required. Teachers were subjected to immense job demands, specifically a large body of content knowledge to teach with shrinking instruction time and ambiguous role. They also felt pressured to incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics in physical education lessons with little or no curricular support. For teachers to teach physical education successfully in this accountability context, systemic changes are needed to provide teachers with adequate professional development and curricular resources to promote learning in physical education.


1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Guiton ◽  
Jeannie Oakes

Focusing on the equity aspect of proposals for making opportunity-to-learn standards integral to an accountability system, this article discusses conceptual issues surrounding determination of equal educational opportunity and explores ways that these issues manifest themselves in empirical formulations of opportunity to learn (OTL). Using two databases, OTL measures are developed according to three alternative conceptions of equality—the Libertarian, Liberal, and Democratic Liberal conceptions—and the influence of these conceptions on the information provided is compared. This examination shows the intimate relation between values on equality and measures of equality and brings these issues to the fore for discussion by educators and policymakers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
Julie D. Hasson

Justine Finley, newly appointed principal of Northside Elementary, had been tasked with increasing her school’s grade under the state accountability system and keeping neighborhood families from choosing to enroll in the charter school down the street. The superintendent made these priorities very clear. After spending the first 3 months observing and analyzing data, Justine realized that a new model for placing students in classes could be a lever for increasing achievement scores. What Justine failed to realize was the conflict that the new model would generate among parents and teachers. This case highlights the challenges a new principal encountered when attempting to implement a change in student and teacher placement procedures amid competing priorities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa D. King ◽  
Jennifer Jennings ◽  
Jason M. Fletcher

Despite the rise of medical interventions to address behavioral issues in childhood, the social determinants of their use remain poorly understood. By analyzing a dataset that includes the majority of prescriptions written for stimulants in the United States, we find a substantial effect of schooling on stimulant use. In middle and high school, adolescents are roughly 30 percent more likely to have a stimulant prescription filled during the school year than during the summer. Socioeconomically advantaged children are more likely than their less advantaged peers to selectively use stimulants only during the academic year. These differences persist when we compare higher and lower socioeconomic status children seeing the same doctors. We link these responses to academic pressure by exploiting variation between states in educational accountability system stringency. We find the largest differences in school year versus summer stimulant use in states with more accountability pressure. School-based selective stimulant use is most common among economically advantaged children living in states with strict accountability policies. Our study uncovers a new pathway through which medical interventions may act as a resource for higher socioeconomic status families to transmit educational advantages to their children, either intentionally or unwittingly.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Toni Triyulianto

The goal of this paper is to provide better information of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) implementation in Indonesian District Governments to policy makers. This study utilizes the evaluation result of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) 2010 to analyze the effort of 273 District governments in Indonesia in implementing the SAKIP.The research question of this paper is:  do auditor’s opinion and number of population have significant different to the SAKIP score?  To investigate what factors that determine the score of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP), several theories as well as a logical thinking were taken to figure out the research question.  Those theories as well as logical thinking reveal that revenue and spending, seize of population, area, poverty level, human development index, auditor’s opinion, number of government employee and education level government employee tend to correlate the SAKIP score.Two hypotheses have been chosen in this paper: 1) higher level in Auditor’s Opinion more likely will increase the SAKIP score evaluation, and 2) size of Population has significant different to the SAKIP score.  Result shows we have to reject all the null hypotheses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-90
Author(s):  
Ella Wargadinata

The relation between performance measurement and accountability is already shown empirically and conceptually in literatures and researches. In 1999, The Government of Indonesia implemented performance accountability system as a periodic government institution accountability mechanism to give their responsibility on resources management, policy implementation based on their authority. The research consist four variables, Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality, Organization capacity and Organization Accountability. Quantitative method used as research method with regression analysis which conducted at 28 local organizations at Bandung city, covered 161 respondents. This research conducted by conceptual framework of performance measurement by Moran (2013), Instrument quality by Van Dooren et al (2010) , organization capacity from Ingraham (2003) and Accountability concept by Koppel (2005.  Research result shows that organization accountability can be achieved if the performance measurement implemented correctly. Research conclusion is Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality and Organization capacity are influence the Organization Accountability. The research recommendation is strengthening performance measurement implementation at local level through knowledge transfer and taking consideration on organization capacity to create compatible perofrmance measurement model based on characteristic organization.   Key Words: Performance Measurement, Mechanism, Quality, Capacity, Accountability, Public Sector


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document