Overview of the Army Research Institute's organizational development research program and its instrumentation

1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Cohen
Author(s):  
Howard Youngs

Distributed leadership is a diverse concept, prominent in the education field since the turn of the millennium. Practitioners, researchers, and policymakers often tout it as a preferred mode of leadership. Distributed leadership has historical roots in the leadership studies field and first came to prominence in the education field as an alternative unit of analysis for understanding leadership through a distributed perspective rather than a focus mainly on discrete leader behaviors. This perspective was surpassed but not replaced by a normative position where distributed leadership is a means for organizational development. Research studies reveal distributed leadership has many forms in practice. The associated knowledge production emerging from such studies as well as typologies and critical commentaries expose multiple positions. Distributed leadership is not only a diverse concept, but a complex one. Despite its popularity, critical perspectives related to power and issues of social justice still require further development. There are also calls to reposition distributed leadership as a hybrid of dispersed and individual leadership.


1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 669-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire B. Ernhart ◽  
Thomas E. Jordan ◽  
Steven D. Spaner

The Quick Test, a brief measure requiring recognition of vocabulary, was given to 503 mothers of mother-child pairs in a research program. Its correlations with demographic variables, IQ of child, and an index of authoritarian attitude demonstrate its validity in such research.


Leadership ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Kjellström ◽  
Kristian Stålne ◽  
Oskar Törnblom

Leadership development is a multifaceted phenomenon with a multitude of definitions and meanings requiring closer exploration. The aim of this study was to identify and investigate qualitatively different ways of understanding leadership development and categorize them from a complexity perspective. We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with professionals and managers. Analysis using a phenomenographic approach revealed six categories and different ways of understanding leadership development: (1) one’s own development, (2) fulfilling a leadership role, (3) personal development, (4) leader and organizational development, (5) collective leadership development, and (6) human development. The categories were arranged hierarchically according to increasing complexity. Our contribution recognizes more nuanced interpretations than previously identified and highlights underlying structures of complexity. The results help to empirically ground and elaborate current theories and distinctions within the field of leadership development research where similar patterns can be observed. They may assist researchers in making both their own and other’s assumptions on leadership development explicit, as well as informing the practice of tailoring leadership development activities to better match individuals and organizational contexts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Vonhof ◽  
Maria Bertele ◽  
Cornelius Bauknecht

Das Institut für Qualitätsmanagement und Organisationsentwicklung in Bibliotheken und Hochschulen (IQO) an der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart stellt die beiden Institutionen ins Zentrum seiner Forschungsarbeit, die die Verbreitung von Qualitätsmanagement als ganzheitlichem Managementansatz im öffentlichen Sektor in den letzten Jahren aktiv vorangebracht haben. Ausgehend von einem ganzheitlichen Qualitätsverständnis werden am IQO Management- und Steuerungsinstrumente entwickelt, die Veränderungsprozesse in Bibliotheken und Hochschulen anstoßen und unterstützen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document