scholarly journals Maternal cell-free DNA–based screening for fetal microdeletion and the importance of careful diagnostic follow-up

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 836-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana A. Yatsenko ◽  
David G. Peters ◽  
Devereux N. Saller ◽  
Tianjiao Chu ◽  
Michelle Clemens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 728
Author(s):  
Maria Panagopoulou ◽  
Manel Esteller ◽  
Ekaterini Chatzaki

Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of death between women. Mortality is significantly raised due to drug resistance and metastasis, while personalized treatment options are obstructed by the limitations of conventional biopsy follow-up. Lately, research is focusing on circulating biomarkers as minimally invasive choices for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is a promising liquid biopsy biomaterial of great potential as it is thought to mirror the tumor’s lifespan; however, its clinical exploitation is burdened mainly by gaps in knowledge of its biology and specific characteristics. The current review aims to gather latest findings about the nature of ccfDNA and its multiple molecular and biological characteristics in breast cancer, covering basic and translational research and giving insights about its validity in a clinical setting.


BioTechniques ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Bedon ◽  
Josef Vuch ◽  
Simeone Dal Monego ◽  
Germana Meroni ◽  
Vanna Pecile ◽  
...  

The discovery of circulating fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women has greatly promoted advances in noninvasive prenatal testing. Screening performance is enhanced with higher fetal fraction and analysis of samples whose fetal DNA fraction is lower than 4% are unreliable. Although current approaches to fetal fraction measurement are accurate, most of them are expensive and time consuming. Here we present a simple and cost-effective solution that provides a quick and reasonably accurate fetal fraction by directly evaluating the size distribution of circulating DNA fragments in the extracted maternal cell-free DNA. The presented approach could be useful in the presequencing stage of noninvasive prenatal testing to evaluate whether the sample is suitable for the test or a repeat blood draw is recommended.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-272
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Li Zhen ◽  
Min Pan ◽  
Dong-Zhi Li

Author(s):  
Amber Mathiesen ◽  
Kali Roy

This chapter provides information about a genetic counselor’s role in prenatal screening, including discussing and offering options to a patient, interpreting and providing results, or managing referrals based on abnormal results. It discusses how a screen is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and personal utility. It provides a detailed description of both maternal serum screening and cell-free DNA testing. The maternal serum screening discussion includes information on multiples of median, calculating risk, timing, pattern association, limitations, and follow-up. The review of cell-free DNA testing includes fetal fraction, methodology, test performance, limitations and considerations for testing, and follow-up. This chapter also provides a list of additional resources to use for cell-free DNA testing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 755-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Liang ◽  
Ying Lin ◽  
Fengchang Qiao ◽  
Hang Li ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. e13100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Beck ◽  
Irina A. Buhimschi ◽  
Taryn L. Summerfield ◽  
William E. Ackerman ◽  
Ozlem Guzeloglu‐Kayisli ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3423-3423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka Kubiczkova-Besse ◽  
Daniela Drandi ◽  
Lenka Sedlarikova ◽  
Stefania Oliva ◽  
Manuela Gambella ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Circulating nucleic acids, such as cell-free DNA (cf-DNA), are becoming a promising minimally-invasive diagnostic tool for cancer detection. Recent studies demonstrated that tumor-derived cf-DNA can be used to monitor tumor burden and response to treatment in patients (pts) with solid tumors as well as hematological malignancies (Dawson et al, 2013, Armand et al, 2013). In this study we investigated the clinical utility of cf-DNA in the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) of pts with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying the tumor specific immunoglobulin (IGH) rearrangement. Methods Cf-DNA was extracted from 1 ml of serum sample from 13 MM patients enrolled in Italian CRD/MEL-200 and EMN-02 protocols. The total amount of cf-DNA was estimated by fluorometric measurement (median 560 ng, range 15-5158 ng) and the length of fragments was evaluated by high sensitivity dsDNA chips (Agilent). Patient specific clonal IGH rearrangement was identified at the time of diagnosis from bone marrow (BM) genomic DNA (gDNA) as previously reported (Ladetto et al, 2000). For each patient, MRD in BM and peripheral blood (PB) was estimated by real time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using ASO-specific primers and the quantification was based on serial 10-fold dilution standard curves from plasmid carrying the patient specific IGH rearrangement. The amount of IGH rearrangement in cf-DNA (cf-IGH) was estimated by qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) (Bio-Rad) on diagnostic and follow up samples and was expressed as the amount of copies per 1 µg of total cf-DNA. qPCR and ddPCR results were interpreted according to the Euro-MRD guidelines (van der Velden et al, 2003). Results Overall, 54 cf-DNA samples from MM serum (13 diagnostic, 41 follow-up samples) were analyzed for the presence of patient specific IGH rearrangement. The most abundant fraction of cf-DNA was 180-220bp, than 350-400bp and 700-10000bp (in 100%, 85% and 68% of samples respectively), whereas longer fragments more often appeared in follow-up samples. By qPCR, cf-IGH at diagnosis were observed in 11/13 diagnostic samples. Only 3/13 pts were quantifiable (116, 85, 187 copies/1 µg of cfDNA) and 8/13 pts were positive but not quantifiable (PNQ) cf-IGH. By ddPCR, levels of cf-IGH at diagnosis were observed in 9/13 pts. 6/13 pts were quantifiable (246, 195, 96, 88, 184, 25 copies/1µg of cfDNA), and only 3/13 pts were PNQ. In follow-up samples, levels of cf-IGH were undetectable by qRT-PCR; however in 5 samples they were PNQ by ddPCR. Interestingly, in one available relapse sample, cf-IGH reappeared again to quantifiable level (61 copies by qRT-PCR and 190 copies by ddPCR). The levels of cf-IGH are quantifiable in samples with higher amount of tumor specific IGH rearrangements in BM or PB; however, no association was observed between cf-IGH level at diagnosis and disease burden estimated by the PCs infiltration in BM or the monoclonal immunoglobulin concentration in blood/urine. Conclusions These data show the potential utility of cf-IGH monitoring in MM pts. Although by qPCR, cf-IGH were detected in 11/13 pts, they were quantifiable only in 3/13 pts and ddPCR was more precise as it was able to quantify cf-IGH in 6/13 pts. Since cf-IGH copies were quantifiable only in diagnostic samples and in 1 available sample at the relapse, we conclude that higher amounts of serum are necessary to overcome the limitation of assay sensitivity. Potential advantages and predictive value, for monitoring tumor marker in a non-invasive manner, need to be further validated on larger cohort of samples using increased amount of cf-DNA. Work was supported by IGA grants NT12130, NT14575. This work is funded by a Black Swan Research Initiative grant by the International Myeloma Foundation "Dynamics of microRNA and cell-free DNA profiles during multiple myeloma progression“. Disclosures Boccadoro: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. S64
Author(s):  
Robert Currier ◽  
Monica Flessel ◽  
Sara Goldman ◽  
Richard Olney

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S297-S298
Author(s):  
Joanna Swinarska ◽  
Jeffrey Rogers ◽  
Alan Christopher Farney ◽  
Robert Joseph Stratta ◽  
Colleen L. Jay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document