scholarly journals Predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor response in urothelial carcinoma: another step in personalised medicine?

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Niegisch
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A660-A660
Author(s):  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Phani Veeranki ◽  
Kevin Chiu ◽  
Vivek Pawar ◽  
Jane Chang ◽  
...  

BackgroundAvelumab, a PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), was recently approved as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy for locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) after disease control with platinum-based chemotherapy.1 Given the evolving treatment landscape, the study aim was to gain real-world insights into clinical decision-making among oncologists for patients with aUC.MethodsIn March 2021, a cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to a sample of US oncologists treating patients with aUC. Oncologists' demographics, practice characteristics, and treatment patterns were obtained; descriptive statistics were used.ResultsThe study included 151 medical oncologists, who reported that 54% and 31% of their patients, on average, would be classified as cisplatin or carboplatin eligible for their 1L treatment, respectively. Approximately 78% of oncologists (n=118) considered using ICI maintenance in ≥40% of their patients following disease control with platinum chemotherapy and were categorized as the “high-consideration” group, for further exploratory analysis; the rest (22%) were in the low-consideration group (See table 1). Approximately, 31% and 27% of oncologists in the high- and low-consideration groups reported administering ICI maintenance with a 2–3-week gap after chemotherapy, while 45% and 46% reported administering it with a 4–6-week gap after chemotherapy, respectively.ConclusionsSurveyed oncologists reported that 85% of patients with aUC in US may be eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. Further, 78% of the surveyed oncologists would consider 1L ICI maintenance therapy after disease control with platinum-based chemotherapy for over 40% of their patients. Future studies are warranted to evaluate real-world treatment patterns, barriers, and utilization of ICI maintenance therapy as the new 1L standard of care.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge all physicians at who participated and completed the survey for the study.ReferencePowles T, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383(13):1218–1230.Ethics ApprovalThe study was reviewed and determined to be exempt by Advarra IRB.ConsentAll survey participated signed a consent form.Abstract 630 Table 1Oncologists characteristics and considerations for 1L ICI maintenance therapy


F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1458
Author(s):  
Hyung Ho Lee ◽  
Hye Ju Kang ◽  
Weon Seo Park ◽  
Wonyoung Choi ◽  
Ho Kyung Seo ◽  
...  

Background: Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma with chondrosarcomatous differentiation (SUCCD) in the ureter has a poor prognosis and is a rare histological variant of ureteral cancer. The majority of ureteral cancers are urothelial carcinomas. Clinical case: We present a case of well-controlled metastatic SUCCD treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor after radical surgery and failed adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient was a 68-year-old male with previous cure history of cT1 staged esophageal squamous cell carcinoma referred to the urology department for a right hydronephroureterosis complicating an intraureteral enhancing mass. After ureteroscopic biopsy and intraureteral urine cytology, atypical pleomorphic cell nests and chondroid tissue consistent with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma were observed. The patient underwent a successful radical right nephroureterectomy with bladder cuffing. The final diagnosis was a pT3N0 sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (heterologous component: chondrosarcoma > 95%) located at the right distal ureter and right renal calyx with infiltration of the periureteric fat and renal parenchyma of the renal capsule. On the postoperative one-month follow-up computed tomography scan, multiple enlarged lymph nodes and metastatic lung nodules were detected. The initiated adjuvant three cycles of gemcitabine-carboplatin therapy was marked by disease progression; thus, second-line therapy with atezolizumab was used for treatment. After five cycles of atezolizumab, the tumors showed a partial response without any grade 3 complications. Conclusion: The recurrent metastatic SUCCD showed good response to the immune checkpoint inhibitor after unsuccessful therapy with radical surgery and first line chemotherapy despite the unfavorable outcome of the pathology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. e238851
Author(s):  
Kieran Murray ◽  
Achilleas Floudas ◽  
Ciara Murray ◽  
Aurelie Fabre ◽  
John Crown ◽  
...  

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer treatment; however, immune-related adverse events do occur, with up to 7% developing inflammatory arthritis. Common rheumatoid arthritis therapies such as methotrexate, prednisolone and biologics have been used to treat this arthritis in small, uncontrolled case series with varying success. In this case of personalised medicine, we report the first use of tofacitinib, a small molecular inhibitor of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, to treat checkpoint inhibitor-related inflammatory arthritis. This resulted in a rapid clinical response and complete, sustained remission of the arthritis with associated marked reduction in synovial molecular and cellular immune response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document