scholarly journals Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified

Nature ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc-Olivier Renou ◽  
David Trillo ◽  
Mirjam Weilenmann ◽  
Thinh P. Le ◽  
Armin Tavakoli ◽  
...  

AbstractAlthough complex numbers are essential in mathematics, they are not needed to describe physical experiments, as those are expressed in terms of probabilities, hence real numbers. Physics, however, aims to explain, rather than describe, experiments through theories. Although most theories of physics are based on real numbers, quantum theory was the first to be formulated in terms of operators acting on complex Hilbert spaces1,2. This has puzzled countless physicists, including the fathers of the theory, for whom a real version of quantum theory, in terms of real operators, seemed much more natural3. In fact, previous studies have shown that such a ‘real quantum theory’ can reproduce the outcomes of any multipartite experiment, as long as the parts share arbitrary real quantum states4. Here we investigate whether complex numbers are actually needed in the quantum formalism. We show this to be case by proving that real and complex Hilbert-space formulations of quantum theory make different predictions in network scenarios comprising independent states and measurements. This allows us to devise a Bell-like experiment, the successful realization of which would disprove real quantum theory, in the same way as standard Bell experiments disproved local physics.

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1350001 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW McKAGUE

We consider the power of various quantum complexity classes with the restriction that states and operators are defined over a real, rather than complex, Hilbert space. It is well known that a quantum circuit over the complex numbers can be transformed into a quantum circuit over the real numbers with the addition of a single qubit. This implies that BQP retains its power when restricted to using states and operations over the reals. We show that the same is true for QMA (k), QIP (k), QMIP and QSZK.


2020 ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
Marcel Danesi

What kind of number is √−1? In a way that parallels the unexpected discovery of √2 by the Pythagoreans, when this number surfaced as a solution to a quadratic equation, mathematicians asked themselves what it could possibly mean. Not knowing what to call it, René Descartes named it an imaginary number. Like the irrationals, the discovery of i led to new ideas and discoveries. One of these was complex numbers—numbers having the form (a + bi), where a and b are real numbers and i is √−1. Incredibly, complex numbers turn out to have many applications. They are used to describe electric circuits and electromagnetic radiation and they are fundamental to quantum theory in physics. This chapter deals with imaginary numbers, which constitute another of the great ideas of mathematics that have not only changed the course of mathematics but also of human history.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 318-325
Author(s):  
Nadia Mesbah ◽  
Hadia Messaoudene ◽  
Asma Alharbi

Abstract Let ℋ {\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }} be a complex Hilbert space and ℬ ( ℋ ) {\mathcal{ {\mathcal B} }}\left({\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }}) denotes the algebra of all bounded linear operators acting on ℋ {\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }} . In this paper, we present some new pairs of generalized finite operators. More precisely, new pairs of operators ( A , B ) ∈ ℬ ( ℋ ) × ℬ ( ℋ ) \left(A,B)\in {\mathcal{ {\mathcal B} }}\left({\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }})\times {\mathcal{ {\mathcal B} }}\left({\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }}) satisfying: ∥ A X − X B − I ∥ ≥ 1 , for all X ∈ ℬ ( ℋ ) . \parallel AX-XB-I\parallel \ge 1,\hspace{1.0em}\hspace{0.1em}\text{for all}\hspace{0.1em}\hspace{0.33em}X\in {\mathcal{ {\mathcal B} }}\left({\mathcal{ {\mathcal H} }}). An example under which the class of such operators is not invariant under similarity orbit is given. Range kernel orthogonality of generalized derivation is also studied.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 1950013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valter Moretti ◽  
Marco Oppio

As earlier conjectured by several authors and much later established by Solèr, from the lattice-theory point of view, Quantum Mechanics may be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces only. On the other hand, no quantum systems seem to exist that are naturally described in a real or quaternionic Hilbert space. In a previous paper [23], we showed that any quantum system which is elementary from the viewpoint of the Poincaré symmetry group and it is initially described in a real Hilbert space, it can also be described within the standard complex Hilbert space framework. This complex description is unique and more precise than the real one as, for instance, in the complex description, all self-adjoint operators represent observables defined by the symmetry group. The complex picture fulfils the thesis of Solér’s theorem and permits the standard formulation of the quantum Noether’s theorem. The present work is devoted to investigate the remaining case, namely, the possibility of a description of a relativistic elementary quantum system in a quaternionic Hilbert space. Everything is done exploiting recent results of the quaternionic spectral theory that were independently developed. In the initial part of this work, we extend some results of group representation theory and von Neumann algebra theory from the real and complex cases to the quaternionic Hilbert space case. We prove the double commutant theorem also for quaternionic von Neumann algebras (whose proof requires a different procedure with respect to the real and complex cases) and we extend to the quaternionic case a result established in the previous paper concerning the classification of irreducible von Neumann algebras into three categories. In the second part of the paper, we consider an elementary relativistic system within Wigner’s approach defined as a locally-faithful irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representation of the Poincaré group in a quaternionic Hilbert space. We prove that, if the squared-mass operator is non-negative, the system admits a natural, Poincaré invariant and unique up to sign, complex structure which commutes with the whole algebra of observables generated by the representation itself. This complex structure leads to a physically equivalent reformulation of the theory in a complex Hilbert space. Within this complex formulation, differently from what happens in the quaternionic one, all self-adjoint operators represent observables in agreement with Solèr’s thesis, the standard quantum version of Noether theorem may be formulated and the notion of composite system may be given in terms of tensor product of elementary systems. In the third part of the paper, we focus on the physical hypotheses adopted to define a quantum elementary relativistic system relaxing them on the one hand, and making our model physically more general on the other hand. We use a physically more accurate notion of irreducibility regarding the algebra of observables only, we describe the symmetries in terms of automorphisms of the restricted lattice of elementary propositions of the quantum system and we adopt a notion of continuity referred to the states viewed as probability measures on the elementary propositions. Also in this case, the final result proves that there exists a unique (up to sign) Poincaré invariant complex structure making the theory complex and completely fitting into Solèr’s picture. The overall conclusion is that relativistic elementary systems are naturally and better described in complex Hilbert spaces even if starting from a real or quaternionic Hilbert space formulation and this complex description is uniquely fixed by physics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 1750021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valter Moretti ◽  
Marco Oppio

As earlier conjectured by several authors and much later established by Solèr (relying on partial results by Piron, Maeda–Maeda and other authors), from the lattice theory point of view, Quantum Mechanics may be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces only. Stückelberg provided some physical, but not mathematically rigorous, reasons for ruling out the real Hilbert space formulation, assuming that any formulation should encompass a statement of Heisenberg principle. Focusing on this issue from another — in our opinion, deeper — viewpoint, we argue that there is a general fundamental reason why elementary quantum systems are not described in real Hilbert spaces. It is their basic symmetry group. In the first part of the paper, we consider an elementary relativistic system within Wigner’s approach defined as a locally-faithful irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representation of the Poincaré group in a real Hilbert space. We prove that, if the squared-mass operator is non-negative, the system admits a natural, Poincaré invariant and unique up to sign, complex structure which commutes with the whole algebra of observables generated by the representation itself. This complex structure leads to a physically equivalent reformulation of the theory in a complex Hilbert space. Within this complex formulation, differently from what happens in the real one, all selfadjoint operators represent observables in accordance with Solèr’s thesis, and the standard quantum version of Noether theorem may be formulated. In the second part of this work, we focus on the physical hypotheses adopted to define a quantum elementary relativistic system relaxing them on the one hand, and making our model physically more general on the other hand. We use a physically more accurate notion of irreducibility regarding the algebra of observables only, we describe the symmetries in terms of automorphisms of the restricted lattice of elementary propositions of the quantum system and we adopt a notion of continuity referred to the states viewed as probability measures on the elementary propositions. Also in this case, the final result proves that there exists a unique (up to sign) Poincaré invariant complex structure making the theory complex and completely fitting into Solèr’s picture. This complex structure reveals a nice interplay of Poincaré symmetry and the classification of the commutant of irreducible real von Neumann algebras.


Filomat ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Sonja Mancevska ◽  
Marija Orovcanec

In this paper are considered some sufficient conditions under which, for given sequence (Ti)i?1 of operators on an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, there is a dense set of points whose orbits under each Ti tend strongly to infinity. .


Author(s):  
Yurii V. Brezhnev

We deduce the Born rule from a purely statistical take on quantum theory within minimalistic math-setup. No use is required of quantum postulates. One exploits only rudimentary quantum mathematics—a linear, not Hilbert’, vector space—and empirical notion of the Statistical Length of a state. Its statistical nature comes from the lab micro-events (detector-clicks) being formalized into the C -coefficients of quantum superpositions. We also comment that not only has the use not been made of quantum axioms (scalar-product, operators, interpretations , etc.), but that the involving thereof would be, in a sense, inconsistent when deriving the rule. In point of fact, the quadratic character of the statistical length, and even not (the ‘physics’ of) Born’s formula, represents a first step in constructing the mathematical structure we name the Hilbert space of quantum states.


Research works on Operators in Complex Hilbert spaces has been the interest of budding researchers in the recent years. In 1996, Furuta et al studied Aluthge transformation on phyponormal operators. Later, in 2001 yamazaki et al studied Aluthge transformation and powers of operators for class A(k)operator. This work was further carried over by Pannayappan et al and D.Senthil kumar et al. In this school work, we studied Aluthge transformation and *- Aluthge transformation for the new class of operator named M class Ak * operator on a non-zero Complex Hilbert space.


1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-382
Author(s):  
M. A. Malik

Let Ω be an open subset of R and H be a complex Hilbert space; (,) represents scalar product in H.Let also A be a closed linear operator with domain DA dense in H and A* with domain D*A be its adjoint. Under graph scalar product DA and D*A are also Hilbert spaces.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 1640026
Author(s):  
T. R. Govindarajan

Quantum theory as formulated in conventional framework using statevectors in Hilbert spaces misses the statistical nature of the underlying quantum physics. Formulation using operators [Formula: see text] algebra and density matrices appropriately captures this feature in addition leading to the correct formulation of particle identity. In this framework, Hilbert space is an emergent concept. Problems related to anomalies and quantum epistemology are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document