scholarly journals Yeast PAF1 complex counters the pol III accumulation and replication stress on the tRNA genes

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratibha Bhalla ◽  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Dipti Vinayak Vernekar ◽  
Aneeshkumar Gopalakrishnan Arimbasseri ◽  
Kuljeet Singh Sandhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Pol Iii

Abstract The RNA polymerase (pol) III transcribes mostly short, house-keeping genes, which produce stable, non-coding RNAs. The tRNAs genes, highly transcribed by pol III in vivo are known replication fork barriers. One of the transcription factors, the PAF1C (RNA polymerase II associated factor 1 complex) is reported to associate with pol I and pol II and influence their transcription. We found low level PAF1C occupancy on the yeast pol III-transcribed genes, which is not correlated with nucleosome positions, pol III occupancy and transcription. PAF1C interacts with the pol III transcription complex and causes pol III loss from the genes under replication stress. Genotoxin exposure causes pol III but not Paf1 loss from the genes. In comparison, Paf1 deletion leads to increased occupancy of pol III, γ-H2A and DNA pol2 in gene-specific manner. Paf1 restricts the accumulation of pol III by influencing the pol III pause on the genes, which reduces the pol III barrier to the replication fork progression.

A transcriptionally active tRNA gene interferes with nucleosome positioning in vivo

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4015-4025
Author(s):  
R H Morse ◽  
S Y Roth ◽  
R T Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Trna Gene ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Nucleosome Positioning ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Cis Acting

Incorporation into a positioned nucleosome of a cis-acting element essential for replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae disrupts the function of the element in vivo [R. T. Simpson, Nature (London) 343:387-389, 1990]. Furthermore, nucleosome positioning has been implicated in repression of transcription by RNA polymerase II in yeast cells. We have now asked whether the function of cis-acting elements essential for transcription of a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase III can be similarly affected. A tRNA gene was fused to either of two nucleosome positioning signals such that the predicted nucleosome would incorporate near its center the tRNA start site and essential A-box element. These constructs were then introduced into yeast cells on stably maintained, multicopy plasmids. Competent tRNA genes were transcribed in vivo and were not incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. Mutated, inactive tRNA genes were incorporated into nucleosomes whose positions were as predicted. This finding demonstrates that the transcriptional competence of the tRNA gene determined its ability to override a nucleosome positioning signal in vivo and establishes that a hierarchy exists between cis-acting elements and nucleosome positioning signals.

scholarly journals Repression of RNA Polymerase I Transcription by the Tumor Suppressor p53

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 5930-5938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiguo Zhai ◽  
Lucio Comai
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT The tumor suppressor protein p53 is frequently inactivated in tumors. It functions as a transcriptional activator as well as a repressor for a number of viral and cellular promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and by RNA Pol III. Moreover, it appears that p53 also suppresses RNA Pol I transcription. In this study, we examined the molecular mechanism of Pol I transcriptional inhibition by p53. We show that wild-type, but not mutant, p53 can repress Pol I transcription from a human rRNA gene promoter in cotransfection assays. Furthermore, we show that recombinant p53 inhibits rRNA transcription in a cell-free transcription system. In agreement with these results, p53-null epithelial cells display an increased Pol I transcriptional activity compared to that of epithelial cells that express p53. However, both cell lines display comparable Pol I factor protein levels. Our biochemical analysis shows that p53 prevents the interaction between SL1 and UBF. Protein-protein interaction assays indicate that p53 binds to SL1, and this interaction is mostly mediated by direct contacts with TATA-binding protein and TAFI110. Moreover, template commitment assays show that while the formation of a UBF-SL1 complex can partially relieve the inhibition of transcription, only the assembly of a UBF-SL1-Pol I initiation complex on the rDNA promoter confers substantial protection against p53 inhibition. In summary, our results suggest that p53 represses RNA Pol I transcription by directly interfering with the assembly of a productive transcriptional machinery on the rRNA promoter.

scholarly journals CHK1 inhibition exacerbates replication stress induced by IGF blockade

Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoning Wu ◽  
Elena Seraia ◽  
Stephanie B. Hatch ◽  
Xiao Wan ◽  
Daniel V. Ebner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribonucleotide Reductase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Deoxynucleotide Triphosphate

AbstractWe recently reported that genetic or pharmacological inhibition of insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) slows DNA replication and induces replication stress by downregulating the regulatory subunit RRM2 of ribonucleotide reductase, perturbing deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) supply. Aiming to exploit this effect in therapy we performed a compound screen in five breast cancer cell lines with IGF neutralising antibody xentuzumab. Inhibitor of checkpoint kinase CHK1 was identified as a top screen hit. Co-inhibition of IGF and CHK1 caused synergistic suppression of cell viability, cell survival and tumour growth in 2D cell culture, 3D spheroid cultures and in vivo. Investigating the mechanism of synthetic lethality, we reveal that CHK1 inhibition in IGF-1R depleted or inhibited cells further downregulated RRM2, reduced dNTP supply and profoundly delayed replication fork progression. These effects resulted in significant accumulation of unreplicated single-stranded DNA and increased cell death, indicative of replication catastrophe. Similar phenotypes were induced by IGF:WEE1 co-inhibition, also via exacerbation of RRM2 downregulation. Exogenous RRM2 expression rescued hallmarks of replication stress induced by co-inhibiting IGF with CHK1 or WEE1, identifying RRM2 as a critical target of the functional IGF:CHK1 and IGF:WEE1 interactions. These data identify novel therapeutic vulnerabilities and may inform future trials of IGF inhibitory drugs.

scholarly journals A transcriptionally active tRNA gene interferes with nucleosome positioning in vivo.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4015-4025 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Morse ◽  
S Y Roth ◽  
R T Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Trna Gene ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Nucleosome Positioning ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Cis Acting

Incorporation into a positioned nucleosome of a cis-acting element essential for replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae disrupts the function of the element in vivo [R. T. Simpson, Nature (London) 343:387-389, 1990]. Furthermore, nucleosome positioning has been implicated in repression of transcription by RNA polymerase II in yeast cells. We have now asked whether the function of cis-acting elements essential for transcription of a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase III can be similarly affected. A tRNA gene was fused to either of two nucleosome positioning signals such that the predicted nucleosome would incorporate near its center the tRNA start site and essential A-box element. These constructs were then introduced into yeast cells on stably maintained, multicopy plasmids. Competent tRNA genes were transcribed in vivo and were not incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. Mutated, inactive tRNA genes were incorporated into nucleosomes whose positions were as predicted. This finding demonstrates that the transcriptional competence of the tRNA gene determined its ability to override a nucleosome positioning signal in vivo and establishes that a hierarchy exists between cis-acting elements and nucleosome positioning signals.

scholarly journals Yeast PAF1 complex restricts the accumulation of RNA polymerase III and counters the replication stress on the transcribed genes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratibha Bhalla ◽  
Dipti Vernekar ◽  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Benoit Gilquin ◽  
Yohann Couté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Adverse Conditions ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Paf1 Complex ◽  
Pol Iii

AbstractMany regulatory proteins and complexes influence transcription by RNA polymerase (pol) II. In comparison, only a few regulatory proteins are known for pol III, which transcribes mostly house-keeping and non-coding genes. Yet, pol III transcription is precisely regulated under various stress conditions like starvation. We used pol III transcription complex components TFIIIC (Tfc6), pol III (Rpc128) and TFIIIB (Brf1) as baits to identify potential interactors through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. A large interactome constituting known chromatin modifiers, factors and regulators of transcription by pol I and pol II revealed the possibility of a large number of signaling cues for pol III transcription against adverse conditions. We found one of the pol II-associated factors, Paf1 complex (PAF1C) interacts with the three baits. Its occupancy on the pol III-transcribed genes is low and not correlated with pol III occupancy. Paf1 deletion leads to higher occupancy of pol III, γ-H2A and DNA pol2 but no change in nucleosome positions. Genotoxins exposure causes pol III but not Paf1 loss from the genes. PAF1C promotes the pol III pausing and restricts its accumulation on the genes, which reduces the replication stress caused by the pol III barrier and transcription-replication conflict on these highly transcribed genes.

scholarly journals Functional mRNA can be generated by RNA polymerase III.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3597-3607 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gunnery ◽  
M B Mathews
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Pol Iii

Eukaryotic cellular mRNA is believed to be synthesized exclusively by RNA polymerase II (pol II), whereas pol I produces long rRNAs and pol III produces 5S rRNA, tRNA, and other small RNAs. To determine whether this functional differentiation is obligatory, we examined the translational potential of an artificial pol III transcript. The coding region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat gene was placed under the control of a strong pol III promoter from the adenovirus type 2 VA RNAI gene. The resultant chimera, pVA-Tat, was transcribed accurately in vivo and in vitro and gave rise to Tat protein, which transactivated a human immunodeficiency virus-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct in transfected HeLa cells. pol III-specific mutations down-regulated VA-Tat RNA production in vivo and in vitro and dramatically reduced chloramphenicol acetyltransferase transactivation. As expected for a pol III transcript, VA-Tat RNA was not detectably capped at its 5' end or polyadenylated at its 3' end, but, like mRNA, it was associated with polysomes in a salt-stable manner. Mutational analysis of a short open reading frame upstream of the Tat-coding sequence implicates scanning in the initiation of VA-Tat RNA translation despite the absence of a cap. In comparison with tat mRNA generated by pol II, VA-Tat RNA was present on smaller polysomes and was apparently translated less efficiently, which is consistent with a relatively low initiation rate. Evidently, human cells are capable of utilizing pol III transcripts as functional mRNAs, and neither a cap nor a poly(A) tail is essential for translation, although they may be stimulatory. These findings raise the possibility that some cellular mRNAs are made by pol I or pol III.

scholarly journals RNA Polymerase III, Ageing and Longevity

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yavuz Kulaberoglu ◽  
Yasir Malik ◽  
Gillian Borland ◽  
Colin Selman ◽  
Nazif Alic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Fragile X ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Pol Iii

Transcription in eukaryotic cells is performed by three RNA polymerases. RNA polymerase I synthesises most rRNAs, whilst RNA polymerase II transcribes all mRNAs and many non-coding RNAs. The largest of the three polymerases is RNA polymerase III (Pol III) which transcribes a variety of short non-coding RNAs including tRNAs and the 5S rRNA, in addition to other small RNAs such as snRNAs, snoRNAs, SINEs, 7SL RNA, Y RNA, and U6 spilceosomal RNA. Pol III-mediated transcription is highly dynamic and regulated in response to changes in cell growth, cell proliferation and stress. Pol III-generated transcripts are involved in a wide variety of cellular processes, including translation, genome and transcriptome regulation and RNA processing, with Pol III dys-regulation implicated in diseases including leukodystrophy, Alzheimer’s, Fragile X-syndrome and various cancers. More recently, Pol III was identified as an evolutionarily conserved determinant of organismal lifespan acting downstream of mTORC1. Pol III inhibition extends lifespan in yeast, worms and flies, and in worms and flies acts from the intestine and intestinal stem cells respectively to achieve this. Intriguingly, Pol III activation achieved through impairment of its master repressor, Maf1, has also been shown to promote longevity in model organisms, including mice. In this review we introduce the Pol III transcription apparatus and review the current understanding of RNA Pol III’s role in ageing and lifespan in different model organisms. We then discuss the potential of Pol III as a therapeutic target to improve age-related health in humans.

scholarly journals The INO80 remodeller in transcription, replication and repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Poli ◽  
Susan M. Gasser ◽  
Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Atpase Subunit ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Chromatin Template

The accessibility of eukaryotic genomes to the action of enzymes involved in transcription, replication and repair is maintained despite the organization of DNA into nucleosomes. This access is often regulated by the action of ATP-dependent nucleosome remodellers. The INO80 class of nucleosome remodellers has unique structural features and it is implicated in a diverse array of functions, including transcriptional regulation, DNA replication and DNA repair. Underlying these diverse functions is the catalytic activity of the main ATPase subunit, which in the context of a multisubunit complex can shift nucleosomes and carry out histone dimer exchange. In vitro studies showed that INO80 promotes replication fork progression on a chromatin template, while in vivo it was shown to facilitate replication fork restart after stalling and to help evict RNA polymerase II at transcribed genes following the collision of a replication fork with transcription. More recent work in yeast implicates INO80 in the general eviction and degradation of nucleosomes following high doses of oxidative DNA damage. Beyond these replication and repair functions, INO80 was shown to repress inappropriate transcription at promoters in the opposite direction to the coding sequence. Here we discuss the ways in which INO80's diverse functions help maintain genome integrity. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document