scholarly journals Childhood growth hormone treatment in women with Turner syndrome - benefits and adverse effects

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Irzyniec ◽  
Wacław Jeż ◽  
Katarzyna Lepska ◽  
Izabela Maciejewska-Paszek ◽  
Jakub Frelich
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Childhood Growth

Abstract Turner syndrome (TS) is characterized by the partial or complete loss of one sex chromosome and results in growth failure, gonadal insufficiency and cardiac anomalies. Treatment with growth hormone (GH) during childhood has indisputable benefits when taking into account the low stature of TS women. Medical records and biochemical findings of 33 TS women treated with GH in childhood (GH+) were compared to those of 124 TS women who did not receive GH (GH−). It seems that the GH-treated group might have had a more severe initial phenotype than the untreated group, as evidenced by higher FSH, more feeding issues in infancy, more lymphedema cases and urinary system malformations. GH+ women were significantly taller and had a better lipid profile and lower prevalence of arterial hypertension than GH− . However, they also had lower thrombocyte counts, a greater prevalence of retrognathism and nail anomalies, especially when the GH treatment was delayed. Long-term GH use was not as effective for growth as GH treatment during the initial period and seemed to have resulted in elevated creatinine levels. GH treatment in childhood has benefits in adulthood; however, adverse effects may occur, especially in individuals with treatment that is delayed or is too long.

scholarly journals Impact of growth hormone treatment on children’s height

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Nur Rochmah ◽  
Muhammad Faizi
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Growth Hormone Treatment ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Height Measurement ◽  
Gh Treatment

Background The use of growth hormone (GH) is a routinetreatment for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), small forgestational age (SGA), and Turner syndrome (TS). During thetreatment, height measurement at regular intervals is a vital stepto assess success. To date, there have been no previous studieson GH treatment in Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, the referralhospital in East Indonesia.Objective To compare body height between pre- and post-growthhormone treatment in pediatric patients.Method This study was a non-randomized, pre-post clinical trialperformed at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya. The prospectivecohort was accessed during January 2008-June 2013. Theinclusion criteria was GH treatment for more than 3 months.Clinical data on GH treatment, including diagnosis, age, heightpre-and post-treatment, height gain, duration of treatment, andparental satisfaction were collected. Two-tailed, paired T-test andPearson’s test were used for statistical analyses.Result Nineteen patients underwent GH treatment during thestudy period, but only twelve patients had complete data and wereincluded in the study. Eight subjects were female. Subjects’ meanage was 11 (range 8-15) years. Nine patients had GHD, 2 hadTS, and 1 had SGA. Mean pre-treatment height was 121.05 cm,while mean post-treatment height was 130.5 cm. Mean durationof treatment was 10.5 (range 3-30) months. Mean height gainwas 0.8 cm/month in GHD and SGA cases, and 0.78 cm/monthfor the TS cases. Eleven parents reported satisfaction with theresults of GH treatment in their children. There is significantdiffrent between pre- and post-treatment (P=0.001). Pearson’scorrelation test (r=0.90) revealed a strong correlation betweengrowth hormone treatment and height gain.Conclusion Growth hormone treatment has impact on heights inGH defficiency, Turner syndrome, and small for gestational age.

scholarly journals Growth Hormone Treatment of Early Growth Failure in Toddlers with Turner Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 3406-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha L. Davenport ◽  
Brenda J. Crowe ◽  
Sharon H. Travers ◽  
Karen Rubin ◽  
Judith L. Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Growth Hormone Treatment ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Growth Hormone Treatment and Aortic Dimensions in Turner Syndrome

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1785-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Bondy ◽  
Phillip L. Van ◽  
Vladimir K. Bakalov ◽  
Vincent B. Ho
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Aortic Diameter ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Background: In recent years many girls with Turner syndrome (TS) have been treated with supraphysiological doses of GH to increase adult height. In addition to promoting statural growth, GH may have direct effects on the cardiovascular system. Objective: We sought to determine whether GH treatment affects aortic diameter in girls with TS because there is an increased risk for aortic dilation and dissection in this syndrome. Methods: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, we compared ascending and descending aortic diameters measured by magnetic resonance imaging in GH-treated (n = 53) vs. untreated (n = 48) patients with TS participating in a National Institutes of Health protocol between 2001 and 2004. Results: The average duration of GH treatment was 4.7 with se 0.4 yr (range 2–11 yr). The two groups were similar in age and weight, but GH-treated subjects were on average 8 cm taller (P = 0.002). The diameter of the ascending aorta was increased by 7.3% and descending aorta by 8.9% in the GH-treated group. However, after correction for age, height, weight, and presence of bicuspid aortic valve and coarctation, using a multiple regression, neither history of GH treatment nor the length of GH treatment had an effect on the aortic diameter. Weight (P = 0.02), height (P = 0.001), and presence of bicuspid aortic valve (P = 0.0001) were associated with larger ascending aortic diameter, whereas age (P = 0.008), height (P = 0.02), and history of coarctation (P = 0.006) were associated with larger descending aortic diameter. Conclusions: GH treatment of girls with TS does not seem to affect ascending or descending aortic diameter above the increase related to the larger body size.

scholarly journals Cardiac Status after Childhood Growth Hormone Treatment of Turner Syndrome

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 2553-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochem van den Berg ◽  
Ellen M. N. Bannink ◽  
Piotr A. Wielopolski ◽  
Wim C. J. Hop ◽  
Lennie van Osch-Gevers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Growth Hormone Treatment ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Childhood Growth ◽  
Cardiac Status

scholarly journals Mortality in Children Receiving Growth Hormone Treatment of Growth Disorders: Data From the Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (9) ◽  
pp. 3195-3205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charmian A Quigley ◽  
Christopher J Child ◽  
Alan G Zimmermann ◽  
Ron G Rosenfeld ◽  
Leslie L Robison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
International Study ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Idiopathic Short Stature ◽  
Growth Disorders ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Abstract Context Although pediatric growth hormone (GH) treatment is generally considered safe for approved indications, concerns have been raised regarding potential for increased risk of mortality in adults treated with GH during childhood. Objective To assess mortality in children receiving GH. Design Prospective, multinational, observational study. Setting Eight hundred twenty-seven study sites in 30 countries. Patients Children with growth disorders. Interventions GH treatment during childhood. Main Outcome Measure Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using age- and sex-specific rates from the general population. Results Among 9504 GH-treated patients followed for ≥4 years (67,163 person-years of follow-up), 42 deaths were reported (SMR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.05). SMR was significantly elevated in patients with history of malignant neoplasia (6.97; 95% CI, 3.81 to 11.69) and borderline elevated for those with other serious non–GH-deficient conditions (2.47; 95% CI, 0.99-5.09). SMRs were not elevated for children with history of benign neoplasia (1.44; 95% CI, 0.17 to 5.20), idiopathic GHD (0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.33), idiopathic short stature (0.20; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.10), short stature associated with small for gestational age (SGA) birth (0.66; 95% CI, 0.08 to 2.37), Turner syndrome (0.51; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.83), or short stature homeobox-containing (SHOX) gene deficiency (0.83; 95% CI, 0.02 to 4.65). Conclusions No significant increases in mortality were observed for GH-treated children with idiopathic GHD, idiopathic short stature, born SGA, Turner syndrome, SHOX deficiency, or history of benign neoplasia. Mortality was elevated for children with prior malignancy and those with underlying serious non–GH-deficient medical conditions.

Adult Height in 299 Patients with Turner Syndrome with or without Growth Hormone Therapy: Results and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Naiara C.B. Dantas ◽  
Adriana F. Braz ◽  
Alexsandra Malaquias ◽  
Sofia Lemos-Marini ◽  
Ivo J.P. Arnhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Growth Hormone Therapy ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Untreated Group ◽  
Target Height ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Different Populations

<b><i>Context:</i></b> Treatment with growth hormone (GH) is considered effective in improving adult height (AH) in Turner syndrome (TS). However, there are few studies comparing AH between treated patients and a concurrent untreated group. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess the efficacy of GH treatment in improving AH in TS and to review previous published studies with treated and untreated groups. <b><i>Participants and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and AH of a large cohort of GH-treated (<i>n</i> = 168) and untreated (<i>n</i> = 131) patients with TS. Data are shown as median and interquartile range (IQR). We assessed pretreatment variables related with AH and compared our results with 16 studies that also included an untreated group. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The GH-treated group was 6.2 cm taller than the untreated group (AH = 149 cm [IQR 144.5–152.5 cm] vs. 142.8 cm [IQR 139–148 cm], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) after 4.9 years of GH treatment with a dose of 0.35 mg/kg/week. AH SDS corrected for target height (TH) was 7.2 cm higher in GH-treated patients. AH SDS ≥−2 was more frequent in GH-treated patients (43%) than in untreated patients (16%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). AH SDS was also more frequently within the TH range in the GH-treated group (52%) than in the untreated group (15%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Height SDS at start of GH therapy and TH SDS were positively correlated with AH (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.375). Considering the current result together with previous similar publications, a mean AH gain of 5.7 cm was observed in GH-treated (<i>n</i> = 696) versus untreated (<i>n</i> = 633) patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our study strengthens the evidence for efficacy of GH therapy in patients with TS from different populations.

Machine learning-based prediction of response to growth hormone treatment in Turner syndrome: the LG Growth Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Mo Kyung Jung ◽  
Jeesuk Yu ◽  
Ji-Eun Lee ◽  
Se Young Kim ◽  
Hae Soon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Standard Deviation Score ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Growth Study ◽  
Gh Treatment

AbstractBackgroundGrowth hormone (GH) treatment has become a common practice in Turner syndrome (TS). However, there are only a few studies on the response to GH treatment in TS. The aim of this study is to predict the responsiveness to GH treatment and to suggest a prediction model of height outcome in TS.MethodsThe clinical parameters of 105 TS patients registered in the LG Growth Study (LGS) were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors for the good responders were identified, and the prediction of height response was investigated by the random forest (RF) method, and also, multiple regression models were applied.ResultsIn the RF method, the most important predictive variable for the increment of height standard deviation score (SDS) during the first year of GH treatment was chronologic age (CA) at start of GH treatment. The RF method also showed that the increment of height SDS during the first year was the most important predictor in the increment of height SDS after 3 years of treatment. In a prediction model by multiple regression, younger CA was the significant predictor of height SDS gain during the first year (32.4% of the variability). After 3 years of treatment, mid-parental height (MPH) and the increment of height SDS during the first year were identified as significant predictors (76.6% of the variability).ConclusionsBoth the machine learning approach and the multiple regression model revealed that younger CA at the start of GH treatment was the most important factor related to height response in patients with TS.

scholarly journals SAT-107 Improved Adult Height in Brazilian Turner Syndrome Patients Treated with Growth Hormone

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Da Cunha Scalco ◽  
Adriana Farrant Braz ◽  
Alexsandra C Malaquias ◽  
Sonir Roberto Rauber Antonini ◽  
Gil Guerra-Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Referral Hospitals ◽  
Height Gain

Abstract Background: Short stature is the most frequent clinical manifestation in Turner syndrome (TS), occurring in 98% of these patients. Growth hormone was shown to improve adult height in TS patients from diverse genetic backgrounds. However, there are few studies on adult height in TS patients from developing countries, where the diagnosis is frequently delayed. Objective: To compare adult height between GH-treated and untreated TS patients. Patients and methods: 120 GH-treated and 109 GH-untreated TS patients from 3 referral hospitals in Brazil were evaluated. The most common reasons for not treating TS patients with GH were late diagnosis or GH unavailability. Data on karyotype, parents’ height, puberty development and GH treatment were obtained from their medical records. Adult height was determined when growth velocity was inferior to 1cm/year during a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Results: The frequency of 45,X karyotype was similar between the groups (48.7% vs. 41.9% in GH-treated vs. GH-untreated TS patients, respectively, P= 0.639). GH-treated TS patients started GH therapy at a chronological age (CA) of 11.2 ± 3.7 yr, bone age of 9.3 ± 3.1 yr, height SDS (British 1965 standards) -3.1 ± 1.1. GH mean dose was 48µg/kg.d and GH treatment duration was 5.4 ± 3.0 yr. Estrogen replacement was started late, at CA of 14.3 ± 2.0 yr in GH-treated and at 14.9 ± 1.9 yr in GH-untreated patients, and the rate of spontaneous puberty was similar between the groups (GH-treated 16.8% vs. GH-untreated 22,8%, P=0.304). Adult height was significantly higher after GH treatment (150.1 ± 5.8 cm vs. 143.3 ± 7.2 cm in GH-treated vs. untreated TS patients, respectively, P &lt; 0.001), even with a small but significant difference in target height between the groups (158.2 ± 4.8 vs. 159.8± 4.5 cm in GH-treated vs. untreated TS patients, respectively, P= 0.015). More than half of the TS GH-treated patients reached normal adult height (equal or higher than 150.2 cm), whereas only 15.6% of GH-untreated patients reached it. Conclusion: Despite the delayed diagnosis of TS patients in our cohort, GH treatment was associated with a significant height gain, and the TS GH-treated group was around 7 cm taller than the GH-untreated group.

scholarly journals MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Growth and growth hormone therapy in short children born preterm

2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. R111-R122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Cristina da Silva Boguszewski ◽  
Adriane de Andre Cardoso-Demartini
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Postnatal Growth ◽  
Childhood Growth ◽  
Short Children ◽  
Postnatal Growth Failure

Approximately 15 million babies are born preterm across the world every year, with less than 37 completed weeks of gestation. Survival rates increased during the last decades with the improvement of neonatal care. With premature birth, babies are deprived of the intense intrauterine growth phase, and postnatal growth failure might occur. Some children born prematurely will remain short at later ages and adult life. The risk of short stature increases if the child is also born small for gestational age. In this review, the effects of being born preterm on childhood growth and adult height and the hormonal abnormalities possibly associated with growth restriction are discussed, followed by a review of current information on growth hormone treatment for those who remain with short stature during infancy and childhood.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document