scholarly journals Real-world Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in HR+/HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby B. Statler ◽  
Brian P. Hobbs ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Annie Gupta ◽  
Cassann N. Blake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Propensity Scores ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

AbstractTreatment patterns and outcomes are unclear for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) disease. This study aimed to: (1) examine the utilization of first-line therapy among HR+/HER2+/MBC patients and (2) compare overall survival (OS) between the identified regimens. We analyzed National Cancer Database patients (HR+/HER2+/MBC) who were treated between 2010 and 2015. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to: (1) identify independent predictors of treatment receipt and (2) determine significant prognostic factors for OS. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and evaluate OS, respectively. Propensity scores were added to all multivariate OS models, thereby accounting for bias in treatment receipt. Of 6,234 patients analyzed, 3770 (60.5%) received hormonal therapy and 2464 (39.5%) received chemotherapy. Receipt of hormonal therapy was associated with older age, grade 1/grade 2 disease, no visceral involvement, higher comorbidity scores, and being white. Multivariate analysis suggest patients receiving hormonal therapy + anti-HER2 experienced improved OS, when compared to chemotherapy + anti-HER2 (HR: 0.74, p = 0.004). Overall, the cohort receiving hormonal therapy + anti-HER2 reported the highest 5-year OS (hormonal + anti-HER2: 47.5% vs. chemotherapy + anti-HER2: 39.8% vs. hormonal: 38.5% vs. chemotherapy: 36.3%, p < 0.001). Our findings suggest de-escalated therapy may be the preferred and potentially more effective care path for HR+/HER2+/MBC patients, signaling a need for randomized studies.

Breast Cancer With Synchronous Metastases: Trends in Survival During a 14-Year Period

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3302-3308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
Khemaies Slimane ◽  
Thomas Bachelot ◽  
Arianne Dunant ◽  
Moise Namer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Over Time

Purpose Although new drugs were approved during the 1990s for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, it is not clear whether their use has changed the outcome of patients in daily practice. This study sought to determine whether survival has improved over time for breast cancer patients who had metastases at diagnosis. Patients and Methods A total of 724 patients have been treated in three French cancer centers for an initially metastatic breast cancer between 1987 and 2000; 343 were diagnosed between 1987 and 1993, and 381 were diagnosed between 1994 and 2000. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of these patients were compared by χ2 test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. Results Characteristics were not different between the patients diagnosed from 1987 to 1993 and those diagnosed from 1994 to 2000. Ten percent of patients treated from 1987 to 1994 and 58% of patients treated from 1994 to 2000 have received either a taxane or a new aromatase inhibitor. The 3-year overall survival rates were 27% for patients treated from 1987 to 1993 and 44% for patients treated from 1994 to 2000 (P < .001). The treatment period (1994 to 2000 v 1987 to 1993) was a prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.6; P < .001). Conclusion The survival of breast cancer patients presenting with metastases at diagnosis has improved over time. This study strongly suggests that this improvement is related to treatment.

The association of HER2 low expression with the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in hormone receptor positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1052-1052
Author(s):  
Kelvin K H Bao ◽  
Leone Sutanto ◽  
Shirley S W Tse ◽  
Ka Man Cheung ◽  
Jeffrey C H Chan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Low Expression

1052 Background: Markers for the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer are limited. The bidirectional crosstalks that exist between ER and HER2 pathways contribute to endocrine resistance. We investigated the association between low levels of HER2 expression and the clinical outcome of patients with ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with ER+ HER2- MBC who received CDK4/6 inhibitor plus either letrozole or fulvestrant between Mar 2017 - Jun 2020 from an institutional cancer registry. HER2-low expression was defined as IHC score 1+, or 2+ with a negative ISH. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the initiation of CDK4/6 inhibitor to the date of radiological or clinical progression, or death. The relationship between HER2 expression levels and PFS was evaluated using log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression modelling. Results: 106 women with MBC were eligible for analysis. Median age at treatment was 58 (23.0-91.4). The majority received palbociclib (84%) while the rest received ribociclib. CDK4/6 inhibitor was used as first-line treatment in 50.9% of cases. Most tumors were of ductal histology (83%) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (84.9%), and 22.6% of the patients had bone-only disease. 77.3% of cases were considered HER2-low expressing. HER2-low expression was associated with a significantly shorter PFS compared with HER2 IHC 0 counterpart (median, 8.9 vs 18.8 months, p= 0.014). In multivariate analysis, HER-2 low expression remained significantly associated with an inferior PFS (HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.03-3.75, p= 0.041) after adjusting for the line of treatment, PgR status and disease extent (bone only vs extra-osseous disease). Conclusions: In patients with ER+ HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, HER2-low expression was associated with an inferior PFS, and may serve as a potential marker candidate for CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy. As novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates demonstrated efficacy in HER2-low expressing MBC, coupled with the emerging evidence for the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with anti-HER2 agents, this HER2-low expression subgroup warrants prospective evaluations in future trials.

Randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with fluoxymesterone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
J N Ingle ◽  
D I Twito ◽  
D J Schaid ◽  
S A Cullinan ◽  
J E Krook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 TAM patients (42%) and 63 of 119 TAM plus FLU patients (53%) (one-sided P = .05). Time to disease progression distributions were better for TAM plus FLU (median, 350 days v 199 days), but the log rank test only approached statistical significance (one-sided P = .07). Duration of response and survival distributions were similar between the two treatment arms. Toxicities, in terms of androgenic side effects, were greater on the TAM plus FLU regimen. Fifty-two patients are evaluable for response with FLU following TAM and 21 (40%) have achieved a response. We conclude that the advantages in terms of response rate and time to progression observed with TAM plus FLU probably represent a biological effect, but are not of sufficient magnitude to justify the routine clinical use of this combination given the lack of survival advantage and side effects encountered.

scholarly journals Survival impact of primary tumor resection in de novo metastatic breast cancer patients (GEICAM/El Alamo Registry)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Lopez-Tarruella ◽  
M. J. Escudero ◽  
Marina Pollan ◽  
Miguel Martín ◽  
Carlos Jara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

AbstractThe debate about surgical resection of primary tumor (PT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients persists. We explored this approach’s outcomes in patients included in a retrospective registry, named El Álamo, of breast cancer patients diagnosed in Spain (1990–2001). In this analysis we only included de novo MBC patients, 1415 of whom met the study’s criteria. Descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out. Median age was 63.1 years, 49.2% of patients had single-organ metastasis (skin/soft tissue [16.3%], bone [33.8%], or viscera [48.3%]). PT surgery (S) was performed in 44.5% of the cases. S-group patients were younger, had smaller tumors, higher prevalence of bone and oligometastatic disease, and lower prevalence of visceral involvement. With a median follow-up of 23.3 months, overall survival (OS) was 39.6 versus 22.4 months (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001) in the S- and non-S groups, respectively. The S-group OS benefit remained statistically and clinically significant regardless of metastatic location, histological type, histological grade, hormone receptor status and tumor size. PT surgery (versus no surgery) was associated with an OS benefit suggesting that loco-regional PT control may be considered in selected MBC patients. Data from randomized controlled trials are of utmost importance to confirm these results.

Methallotionein expression and outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1085-1085
Author(s):  
Jorge Arturo Rios-Perez ◽  
Sameem Abedin ◽  
Margaret Quinn Rosenzweig ◽  
Su Yon Jung ◽  
Rohit Bhargava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Bivalent Metal Ions

1085 Background: Platinum-based agents are important components of therapy of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and triple negative breast cancer. Their use can be limited by development of resistance. Metallothioneins (MT) are low molecular weight proteins believed to bind bivalent metal ions such as platinum and zinc. MT expression has been associated with decreased survival in breast cancer patients. A proposed mechanism confers resistance to platinum-based agents by their inactivation or limitation of their activity by MT binding. Methods: MT expression in 99 women with MBC (selected at random from our database of 800 women with MBC) was determined from primary breast cancer tissue (n=80) or metastatic tissue n=19). MT expression was determined by immunohistochemistry, and graded as negative, weak, moderate or strong. Clinical data was obtained through our database and supplemented by chart review. Overall survival from breast cancer diagnosis (OS), progression free survival for first metastastic regimen (PFS), and time from first metastasis to death or last update (metastatic survival, MS), were calculated through December 2011 using the log rank test. Results: Consistent with prior studies, moderate to strong MT expression was associated with decreased 5-year OS (p=.03). There was no correlation between MT expression and PFS or MS in this cohort. Surprisingly, MT expression at any degree was strongly associated with better MS in patients with MBC that received carboplatin-based regimens in the first line (n=25, p=.0005) or at any line (n=41, p=.0437). Conclusions: Consistent with prior studies, MT expression was associated with decreased survival in patients with MBC. Surprisingly, MT expression was associated with longer MS in patients with MBC that received carboplatin. These findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis that MT expression causes chemoresistance to platinum based agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind these findings.

BOLERO-2: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus and exemestane versus exemestane.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
J. Thaddeus Beck ◽  
José Baselga ◽  
Shinzaburo Noguchi ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

125 Background: BOLERO-2, a phase III study, randomized 724 patients with hormone-receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer, who had recurrence or progression on/after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, to everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE) or EXE + placebo. A preplanned 12-mo median time interim analysis demonstrated that EVE + EXE significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs EXE + placebo, but EVE + EXE resulted in a higher rate of grade 3-4 toxicity. Per-protocol patients reported HRQoL data are limited; here we report on additional post hoc analyses of these outcomes. Methods: Using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, HRQoL was assessed at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until progression. QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items combined into 15 subscales, including a Global Health Status (GHS), where higher scores (range, 0-100) indicate better HRQoL. Analysis included a protocol-specified time to definitive deterioration (TTD) analysis at a 5% decrease in QoL relative to baseline, with no subsequent increase above this threshold. We report additional sensitivity analyses using 10-point minimally important difference (MID) decreases in QLQ-C30 score relative to baseline. Treatment arms were compared using a stratified log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for trial stratum (visceral metastases and previous hormone sensitivity), age, sex, race, baseline score, ECOG performance status, prognostic risk factors, and treatment history. Results: Baseline QLQ-C30 GHS scores were not statistically significantly different across treatment groups (64.7 vs 65.3; difference –0.7 [95% CI, –4.3-3.0]). Median TTD in HRQoL was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.3) for EVE + EXE vs 5.6 (95% CI, 4.2-7.0) for EXE (p = .0792). Adjusted HR (0.80) approached significance (95% CI, 0.63-1.02). At the 10-point MID, median TTD for EVE + EXE was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 8.3-11.2) vs 8.4 mo (95% CI, 6.3-12.5) for EXE. Adjusted HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.69-1.18). Conclusions: These additional analyses from the BOLERO-2 study demonstrate that in addition to significantly improving PFS, EVE + EXE does not compromise HRQoL.

scholarly journals The Difference in Clinical and Prognostic Features Between De Novo and Recurrent Her2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Acta Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Yusuf Acikgoz ◽  
Yakup Ergun ◽  
Gokhan Ucar ◽  
Merve Dirikoc ◽  
Dogan Uncu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Her 2

Abstract   BACKGROUND: There are different data in the literature about the consequences of the development of metastasis as de novo or recurrent. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic and prognostic characteristics of HER-2 positive de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of patients admitted to our clinic between 1996-2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The baseline features, treatments and survival data were recorded. Recurrent metastatic patients were further categorized as disease free interval (DFI) <24 months and DFI >24 months. The features of two groups were analyzed by pearson chi-square test. Survival were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method with the Long-rank test. p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included to study in which 20 patients in de novo HER-2 positive MBC group and 24 patients in recurrent HER-2 MBC group. There was no difference in baseline features between groups. The median OS in de novo and recurrent MBC group was 60.3 months and 43.9 months respectively (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.37-2.05, p=0.76). OS was not different between de novo MBC group and patients with DFI <24 months and with DFI > 24 months (p=0.135). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that baseline features of patients with de novo HER-2 positive MBC and recurrent HER-2 positive MBC did not differ from each other. The presence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis or during follow-up did not change response to treatments.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document