scholarly journals Development of an immune-related gene pairs index for the prognosis analysis of metastatic melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-zhi Huang ◽  
Min Mao ◽  
Jie Zheng ◽  
Hai-qi Liang ◽  
Feng-ling Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene

AbstractMelanoma is a skin cancer with great metastatic potential, which is responsible for the major deaths in skin cancer. Although the prognosis of melanoma patients has been improved with the comprehensive treatment, for patients with metastasis, the complexity and heterogeneity of diffuse diseases make prognosis prediction and systematic treatment difficult and ineffective. Therefore, we established a novel personalized immune-related gene pairs index (IRGPI) to predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma, which was conducive to provide new insights into clinical decision-making and prognostic monitoring for metastatic melanoma. Through complex analysis and filtering, we identified 24 immune-related gene pairs to build the model and obtained the optimal cut-off value from receiver operating characteristic curves, which divided the patients into high and low immune-risk groups. Meantime, the Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox regression analysis and subgroup analysis showed that IRGPI had excellent prognostic value. Furthermore, IRGPI was shown that was closely associated with immune system in the subsequent tumor microenvironment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis. In addition, we broken through the data processing limitations of traditional researches in different platforms through the application of gene pairs, which would provide great credibility for our model. We believe that our research would provide a new perspective for clinical decision-making and prognostic monitoring in metastatic melanoma.

scholarly journals Prognostic Implications of Immune-Related Gene Pairs Signatures in Bladder Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Hui Xiong ◽  
Hui Gao ◽  
Jinding Hu ◽  
Yun Dai ◽  
Hanbo Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene

Compelling evidence indicates that immune function is correlated with the prognosis of bladder cancer (BC). Here, we aimed to develop a clinically translatable immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) prognostic signature to estimate the overall survival (OS) of bladder cancer. From the 251 prognostic-related IRGPs, 37 prognostic-related IRGPs were identified using LASSO regression. We identified IRGPs with the potential to be prognostic markers. The established risk scores divided BC patients into high and low risk score groups, and the survival analysis showed that risk score was related to OS in the TCGA-training set ( p < 0.001 ; HR = 7.5 [5.3, 10]). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC for the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up was 0.820, 0.883, and 0.879, respectively. The model was verified in the TCGA-testing set and external dataset GSE13507. Multivariate analysis showed that risk score was an independent prognostic predictor in patients with BC. In addition, significant differences were found in gene mutations, copy number variations, and gene expression levels in patients with BC between the high and low risk score groups. Gene set enrichment analysis showed that, in the high-risk score group, multiple immune-related pathways were inhibited, and multiple mesenchymal phenotype-related pathways were activated. Immune infiltration analysis revealed that immune cells associated with poor prognosis of BC were upregulated in the high-risk score group, whereas immune cells associated with a better prognosis of BC were downregulated in the high-risk score group. Other immunoregulatory genes were also differentially expressed between high and low risk score groups. A 37 IRGPs-based risk score signature is presented in this study. This signature can efficiently classify BC patients into high and low risk score groups. This signature can be exploited to select high-risk BC patients for more targeted treatment.

scholarly journals Development and Verification of an Immune-Related Gene Pairs Prognostic Signature in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Feng ◽  
Shanshan Mu ◽  
Yao Ma ◽  
Wenji Wang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Prognostic Signature ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene ◽  
Risk Patients

With the increasing prevalence of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the poor prognosis of immunotherapy, reliable immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) prognostic signature is required for personalized management and treatment of patients. Gene expression profiles and clinical information of HCC patients were obtained from the TCGA and ICGC databases. The IRGPs are constructed using immune-related genes (IRGs) with large variations. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to construct IRGPs signature. The IRGPs signature was verified through the ICGC cohort. 1,309 IRGPs were constructed from 90 IRGs with high variability. We obtained 50 IRGPs that were significantly connected to the prognosis and constructed a signature that included 17 IRGPs. In the TCGA and ICGC cohorts, patients were divided into high and low-risk patients by the IRGPs signature. The overall survival time of low-risk patients is longer than that of high-risk patients. After adjustment for clinical and pathological factors, multivariate analysis showed that the IRGPs signature is an independent prognostic factor. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the accuracy of the signature. Besides, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that the signature is related to immune biological processes, and the immune microenvironment status is distinct in different risk patients. The proposed IRGPs signature can effectively assess the overall survival of HCC, and provide the relationship between the signature and the reactivity of immune checkpoint therapy and the sensitivity of targeted drugs, thereby providing new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

scholarly journals Practical Concerns Regarding the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Guidelines

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Buethe ◽  
C. Warner ◽  
J. Miedler ◽  
C. J. Cockerell
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
T Stage ◽  
7Th Edition

The 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual represents a dramatic shift in the way that cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is staged, in that it is first attempt to incorporate evidence-based medicine into the staging guidelines for cSCC. In our opinion, the changes made to the seventh edition represent a significant improvement over previous editions and will ultimately lead to improved patient stratification, more accurate prognostic data, and a better framework to guide clinical decision making. However, there are a number of issues within the latest guidelines that require clarification or are impractical for clinical practice. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the key changes to the 6th edition staging manual as they pertain to cSCC, to point out impractical component of the 7th edition and/or aspects that require further clarification, and to make recommendations that address any current shortcomings to improve subsequent editions. Specific focus will be given to the inclusion of separate guidelines for cSCC and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the incorporation of high-risk factors as modifiers of T stage, the addition of new guidelines for advanced T stage, and the changes in stratification of lymph node status. This paper is modified from a more comprehensive treatment of the staging of nonmelanoma skin cancer by Warner and Cockerell entitled“The new 7th edition American joint committee on cancer staging of cutaneous nonmelanoma skin cancer: a critical review,”in the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology (paper accepted, pending publication).

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document