scholarly journals Prediction accuracy of standard and total keratometry by swept-source optical biometer for multifocal intraocular lens power calculation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hun Lee ◽  
Jae Lim Chung ◽  
Young Jun Kim ◽  
Jae Yong Kim ◽  
Hungwon Tchah
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Power Calculation ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Swept Source ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Optical Biometer

AbstractWe aimed to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK). In this retrospective observational case series study, a total of 302 patients who underwent cataract surgery with multifocal IOL implantation were included. Predicted refractive outcomes were calculated based on the current standard formulas and a new formula developed for TK using K and TK, which were obtained from a swept-source optical biometer. At 2-month postoperatively, median absolute prediction errors (MedAEs) and proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of predicted postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction were analyzed. There was no significant difference between MedAEs or proportion of eyes within ± 0.50D of predicted refraction from K and TK in each formula. In TFNT00 and 839MP IOL cases, there was no difference between MedAEs from K and TK using any formula. In 829MP IOL cases, MedAE from TK was significantly larger than that from K in Barrett Universal II/Barrett TK Universal II (P = 0.033). In 677MY IOL cases, MedAE from TK was significantly larger than that from K in Haigis (P = 0.020) and Holladay 2 (P = 0.006) formulas. In the subgroup analysis for IOL, there was no difference between the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D of predicted refraction from K and TK using any formula. TFNT00 and 839MP IOLs were favorable with TK, with 677MY IOL with K and 829MP IOL being in a neutral position, which necessitates the study that investigates the accuracy of the new TK technology.

scholarly journals Mobile App for Pre- and Intraoperative Assessment of Astigmatism Correction with Toric Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Francisco Aecio Fernandes Dias ◽  
Vinicius Jose Fernandes Dias ◽  
Barbara de Araujo Lima Dutra ◽  
Anna Christina Siqueira Marques ◽  
Edgar Marçal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Astigmatism Correction ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. To develop a mobile app that allows capturing and editing of photographs, performs image transposition and projection of a protractor with 360° axis markings, and permits accurate visualization of programmed alignment for the positioning of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods. In this prospective case series study, a codesign methodology was chosen to develop the Eye Axis Check application. After app development, measurements were obtained and comparisons were made between manual marks and toric IOL alignment without and with the app in 30 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery with toric IOLs. The mobile app was made available to 15 ophthalmic surgeons in different cities to assess its usability. Results. The users approved the developed application for its ease of use and utility. The mean difference between the markings made manually and those made with the app was 1° (±2°; range: 0°–5°), and the mean difference between the IOL position and the assessment made by the app was 3° (±3°; range: 0°–12°). Upon comparison of the agreement between the app measurements and the manual measurements for the IOL angle, no significant differences were found, and an excellent concordance (0.997) and a strong positive linear correlation (0.995) were observed. Conclusion. A mobile app for preoperative planning and intraoperative toric IOL alignment was developed and revealed to be useful and easy to use.

scholarly journals Comparing the Lenstar Optical Biometer and the Verion Image-Guided System for intraocular lens power calculation

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-243
Author(s):  
Mun Wai Lee
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Power Calculation ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Iol Power Calculation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Iol Calculation ◽  
Iol Power ◽  
Optical Biometer

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement parameters of the new Verion Image Guided System compared with an established standard of care. Purpose: To compare the keratometry (K) and white-to-white (WTW) measurements obtained from the Lenstar Optical Biometer (LS) with those from the Verion Image-Guided System (VR) and their effect on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Design: Prospective comparative case series. Materials and methods: Sixty patients going for cataract surgery had biometry measurements and IOL calculation with the LS. Axial length from LS was used together with K and WTW measurements from VR for IOL calculation as well. IOL selection was done using the Barrett Universal II formula targeting emmetropia. The prediction error (PE) within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, and 1 D of refractive target and the mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for both the LS and VR. Results: Keratometry measurements and steep axis from the VR were closely correlated with the LS (Pearson correlation coefficient K1, r = 0.958; K2, r = 0.952; axis, r = 0.950). The WTW measurements were less so (WTW, r = 0.471). The MAE was 0.317 and 0.347 for LS and VR, respectively. PE within 0.25 D was 48.3% and 40%; within 0.5 D was 83.3% and 76.7%; and within 1 D was 98.3% and 96.7% for LS and VR, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in MAE between the LS and VR (p = 0.74) Conclusion: Using the K and WTW measurements from the Verion Image-Guided System for IOL power calculation did provide comparable results with the Lenstar. The Lenstar had a higher proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of refractive target but the difference was not statistically significant.  

Comparison of incidence of repositioning surgery to correct misalignment with three toric intraocular lenses

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuro Oshika ◽  
Yoshifumi Fujita ◽  
Atsushi Hirota ◽  
Mikio Inamura ◽  
Yasushi Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: To compare the incidence of re-orientating surgery to improve misalignment of three models of acrylic toric intraocular lenses: AcrySof toric intraocular lens (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.), TECNIS toric intraocular lens (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Inc.) and HOYA 355 toric intraocular lens (HOYA). Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter case series, medical charts were reviewed for collecting data on realignment surgery of toric intraocular lenses at 10 ophthalmic surgical sites in Japan. Results: Over all, intraocular lens repositioning surgery was conducted in 89 of 9430 eyes (0.944%) at an average of 10.5 ± 9.7 days after the initial cataract surgery. The incidence was 0.213% (11/5155), 1.797% (62/3451) and 1.942% (16/824) with AcrySof, TECNIS and HOYA toric intraocular lenses, respectively. The incidence was significantly lower with AcrySof than with other two brands of toric intraocular lenses ( p < 0.0001). In those eyes which underwent reorientation surgery, the amount of misalignment was 26.4 ± 21.9°, 29.7 ± 15.4° and 28.1 ± 20.7° with AcrySof, TECNIS and HOYA toric intraocular lenses, respectively; there was no significant difference among groups ( p = 0.821). The repositioning surgery significantly reduced misalignment in all three groups. Conclusion: The rotational stability was considerably different among toric intraocular lenses of different manufacturers. The incidence of repositioning surgery was significantly lower with AcrySof than with TECNIS and HOYA toric intraocular lenses.

scholarly journals Surgically induced astigmatism and coupling effect-mediated keratometric changes after conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Angermann ◽  
Christoph Palme ◽  
Philipp Segnitz ◽  
Andreas Dimmer ◽  
Eduard Schmid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Coupling Effect ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Incision Size ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Surgically Induced ◽  
Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Summary Background The aim of the present study was to describe surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and the coupling effect after conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPS) in relation to the incisional axis. Material and methods A total of 42 patients were included in the retrospective case series study. Corneal topography was obtained for patients with significant cataract before and 6 weeks after CPS with a main clear corneal incision size of 2.4 mm. Patients were grouped according to the relationship of the incisional axis to the position of the steep axis into a steep incisional group and a flat incisional group. Results In total, 46 eyes were included in the study. While the steep incisional group showed an SIA of −0.15 D (± 0.35), the flat incisional group had a significantly higher SIA of 0.20 D (± 0.51) (p = 0.03). The coupling ratio (CR) in the steep incisional group was −0.38 (± 1.41) and in the flat incisional group it was 0.16 (± 0.97). Correspondingly, a coupling constant (CC) of −0.25 was found for group 1 and a CC of 0.0 for group 2. Conclusion Our results suggest that the location of the main incision should be decided with consideration of the corneal astigmatism in order to minimize the SIA. The CR helps to understand the effect of induced astigmatism and the change in spherical equivalent.

scholarly journals Frequency of Complications Following Cataract Surgery in Diabetic Patients at Tertiary Care Hospital

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Shafqat Ali Shah ◽  
Marina Murad ◽  
Saad Ali ◽  
Ammad Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Posterior Capsule Opacification ◽  
Posterior Capsule ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Case Series Study

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of complications following cataract surgery in diabetic patients admitted in the ophthalmology unit. METHODOLOGY: A prospective descriptive interventional case series study was conducted after approval of the ethical committee, from June 2017-June 2020 at the Ophthalmology department MTI-MMC. A total of 129 patients from either gender were enrolled in study. All the study patients went through detailed history and complete ocular examination. After necessary investigations, surgical procedure was carried out. Results were analyzed through the SPSS-24 version. RESULTS: Out of the total 129 eyes of the diabetic patients, fifty-nine (45.7%) were males and seventy (54.3%) were females with a ratio of 1:1.2. Uveitis leads the chart in complications found in twenty (15.50%) eyes while PODR being the least common found in only ten (7.75%) eyes. Worse visual acuity was observed in fourteen (10.85%) eyes. Striate keratopathy and posterior capsule opacification were found in sixteen (12.40%) and fifteen (11.62%) eyes respectively. Among the patients, 15.7% were having more than one complication during follow-up visits and eighty-eight (68.2%) eyes were found to have none complication. The age group 51-60 years observed frequent complications as compared to other groups. Similarly female gender (38.57%) has frequent complications as compared to males (2.7%). CONCLUSION: The study concludes Uveitis as the most common complication observed in 15.50% 0f the eyes while worse visual acuity (10.85%) and progression of diabetic retinopathy (7.75%) being the least common. Striate keratopathy was found in 12.40% while posterior capsule opacification in 11.62% of the eyes.

scholarly journals Anatomical and Visual Effects of Implantable Phakic Contact Lens on Correction of Myopia

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Ekram ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Kamal Elshafei ◽  
Asmaa Anwar Mohamed ◽  
Mohamed Farouk Sayed Othman Abdelkader
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Anterior Chamber ◽  
Contact Lens ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Anterior Chamber Depth ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical effects of implantable phakic contact lens (IPCL) (Care Group, India) on anterior segment and its visual outcomes .Patients and methods: In a prospective interventional case series study, 60 highly myopic eyes of 32 patients were subjected to IPCL implantation in the Ophthalmology Department of Minia University Hospital, Egypt from January 2019 to June 2021. All patients had complete ophthalmic examination and were followed up for 1 year. Pentacam was used for preoperative and postoperative estimation of anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and IPCL vault in the 1st, 3rd, and 12th months. Assessment of corneal endothelium was done using specular microscope preoperatively and after 12 months. Preoperative and postoperative refraction and visual acuity were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in ACD, ACA, and ACV. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean intraocular pressure (IOP) by the 12th month (P=0.163). The mean preoperative endothelial cell count (ECD) was significantly reduced from 2929.3±248 cells/mm2 to 2737.9±303 cells/mm2 at the 12th month (P<0.001). with a statistically highly significant improvement of mean Log Mar uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) from 1.48±0.19 preoperatively to 0.46±0.11 by the end of follow up (P<0.001) with insignificant difference between preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and postoperative UCVA (P=0.209). In the 12th month, the mean vault was 240±540 μm. No sight threatening complications occurred.Conclusion: Although IPCL induced anatomical changes, it was safe and effective for correction of high myopia.

scholarly journals Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
asli cetinkaya yaprak ◽  
Mustafa Unal
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
World Health ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes and visual quality of patients undergoing cataract surgery with the implantation of two different models of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).MethodsThis randomized prospective comparative study included 60 eyes of 15 patients who scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract surgery with the implantation of two models of diffractive trifocal IOLs (RayOne Trifocal and AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL). Monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, UDVA), intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA, UIVA) at 60 and 80 cm, near visual acuity (DCNVA, UNVA), and patient satisfaction were compared over a three-month follow-up.ResultsEach group comprised 30 eyes of 15 patients. No statistically significant differences were determined between the groups in terms of CDVA, UDVA, DCNVA and UNVA. The monocular and binocular UIVA values at 60 cm were better in the PanOptix IOL group (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively), and the DCIVA and UIVA values at 80 cm were better in the RayOne IOL group (p=0.01, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.042, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in relation to the frequency and severity of visual symptoms evaluated. Regarding discomfort, the RayOne IOL group had more bothersome halos and starbursts (p=0.026 and p=0.01, respectively).ConclusionBoth IOLs provided very good restoration of visual acuity. However, with the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL, the likelihood of patients experiencing bothersome halos and starbursts was less. The RayOne Trifocal IOL might be a better choice for patients who require further intermediate vision.The study was registered under the World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform: NCT04655274, 30/11/2020, prospectively registered.

Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212096203
Author(s):  
David Carmona-González ◽  
Alfredo Castillo-Gómez ◽  
Carlos Palomino-Bautista ◽  
Marta Romero-Domínguez ◽  
María Ángeles Gutiérrez-Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Case Series ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Power Calculation ◽  
Refractive Outcome ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation ◽  
Iol Power Calculation ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Iol Power

Purpose To compare the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK-T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Haigis, Holladay II, Olsen, Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, Ladas Super formula, EVO and Kane). Setting Private university hospital (QuironSalud, Madrid, Spain). Design Retrospective case series Methods Data were compiled from 481 eyes of 481 patients who had undergone uneventful cataract surgery with IOL insertion. Preoperative biometric measurements were made using an IOL Master® 700. Respective ULIB IOL constants ( http://ocusoft.de/ulib/c1.htm ) for each of 4 IOL models implanted were used to calculate the predictive refractive outcome for each formula. This was compared with the actual refractive outcome determined 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was mean absolute prediction error (MAE). The study sample was divided according to axial length (AL) into three groups of eyes: short (⩽22.00 mm), normal (22.00–25.00 mm) and long (⩾25.00 mm). Results The Barrett Universal II and Haigis formulas yielded the lowest MAEs over the entire AL range ( p < .01, except EVO) as well as in the long ( p < .01, all formulas) and normal ( p < .01, except Haigis, Holladay II, Olsen and LSF) eyes. In the short eyes, the lower MAEs were provided by Haigis and EVO ( p < .01 except Hoffer Q, SRK/T and Holladay I). Conclusions Barrett Universal II was the most accurate for IOL power calculation in the normal and long eyes. For short eyes, the formulas Haigis and EVO seem best at predicting refractive outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document