scholarly journals An alternative pathway for membrane protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah O’Keefe ◽  
Guanghui Zong ◽  
Kwabena B. Duah ◽  
Lauren E. Andrews ◽  
Wei Q. Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Alternative Pathway ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Transmembrane Proteins ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Major Site ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Membrane Complex ◽  
Protein Biogenesis

AbstractThe heterotrimeric Sec61 complex is a major site for the biogenesis of transmembrane proteins (TMPs), accepting nascent TMP precursors that are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the signal recognition particle (SRP). Unlike most single-spanning membrane proteins, the integration of type III TMPs is completely resistant to small molecule inhibitors of the Sec61 translocon. Using siRNA-mediated depletion of specific ER components, in combination with the potent Sec61 inhibitor ipomoeassin F (Ipom-F), we show that type III TMPs utilise a distinct pathway for membrane integration at the ER. Hence, following SRP-mediated delivery to the ER, type III TMPs can uniquely access the membrane insertase activity of the ER membrane complex (EMC) via a mechanism that is facilitated by the Sec61 translocon. This alternative EMC-mediated insertion pathway allows type III TMPs to bypass the Ipom-F-mediated blockade of membrane integration that is seen with obligate Sec61 clients.

scholarly journals Cotranslational Intersection between the SRP and GET Targeting Pathways to the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (18) ◽  
pp. 2374-2383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Thea Schäffer ◽  
Tina Wölfle ◽  
Edith Fitzke ◽  
Gerhard Thiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Transmembrane Proteins ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Channel Proteins ◽  
Membrane Spanning ◽  
Combined Data

Targeting of transmembrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proceeds via either the signal recognition particle (SRP) or the guided entry of tail-anchored proteins (GET) pathway, consisting of Get1 to -5 and Sgt2. While SRP cotranslationally targets membrane proteins containing one or multiple transmembrane domains, the GET pathway posttranslationally targets proteins containing a single C-terminal transmembrane domain termed the tail anchor. Here, we dissect the roles of the SRP and GET pathways in the sorting of homologous, two-membrane-spanning K+channel proteins termed Kcv, Kesv, and Kesv-VV. We show that Kcv is targeted to the ER cotranslationally via its N-terminal transmembrane domain, while Kesv-VV is targeted posttranslationally via its C-terminal transmembrane domain, which recruits Get4-5/Sgt2 and Get3. Unexpectedly, nascent Kcv recruited not only SRP but also the Get4-5 module of the GET pathway to ribosomes. Ribosome binding of Get4-5 was independent of Sgt2 and was strongly outcompeted by SRP. The combined data indicate a previously unrecognized cotranslational interplay between the SRP and GET pathways.

scholarly journals Vestiges of the bacterial signal recognition particle-based protein targeting in mitochondria

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Pyrih ◽  
Tomáš Pánek ◽  
Ignacio Miguel Durante ◽  
Vendula Rašková ◽  
Kristýna Cimrhanzlová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Signal Peptide ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Mitochondrial Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Mitochondrial Ribosome ◽  
Docking Protein

Abstract The main bacterial pathway for inserting proteins into the plasma membrane relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP), composed of the Ffh protein and an associated RNA component, and the SRP-docking protein FtsY. Eukaryotes use an equivalent system of archaeal origin to deliver proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas a bacteria-derived SRP and FtsY function in the plastid. Here we report on the presence of homologs of the bacterial Ffh and FtsY proteins in various unrelated plastid-lacking unicellular eukaryotes, namely Heterolobosea, Alveida, Goniomonas, and Hemimastigophora. The monophyly of novel eukaryotic Ffh and FtsY groups, predicted mitochondrial localization experimentally confirmed for Naegleria gruberi, and a strong alphaproteobacterial affinity of the Ffh group, collectively suggest they constitute parts of an ancestral mitochondrial signal peptide-based protein-targeting system inherited from the last eukaryotic common ancestor, but lost from the majority of extant eukaryotes. The ability of putative signal peptides, predicted in a subset of mitochondrial-encoded N. gruberi proteins, to target a reporter fluorescent protein into the endoplasmic reticulum of Trypanosoma brucei, likely through their interaction with the cytosolic SRP, provided further support for this notion. We also illustrate that known mitochondrial ribosome-interacting proteins implicated in membrane protein targeting in opisthokonts (Mba1, Mdm38, and Mrx15) are broadly conserved in eukaryotes and non-redundant with the mitochondrial SRP system. Finally, we identified a novel mitochondrial protein (MAP67) present in diverse eukaryotes and related to the signal peptide-binding domain of Ffh, which may well be a hitherto unrecognized component of the mitochondrial membrane protein-targeting machinery.

scholarly journals Hierarchical regulation of mRNA partitioning between the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2646-2658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Chen ◽  
Sujatha Jagannathan ◽  
David W. Reid ◽  
Tianli Zheng ◽  
Christopher V. Nicchitta
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Endomembrane System ◽  
Genomic Analyses ◽  
Specific Manner ◽  
Signal Encoding ◽  
Mrna Transcriptome

The mRNA transcriptome is currently thought to be partitioned between the cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartments by binary selection; mRNAs encoding cytosolic/nucleoplasmic proteins are translated on free ribosomes, and mRNAs encoding topogenic signal-bearing proteins are translated on ER-bound ribosomes, with ER localization being conferred by the signal-recognition particle pathway. In subgenomic and genomic analyses of subcellular mRNA partitioning, we report an overlapping subcellular distribution of cytosolic/nucleoplasmic and topogenic signal-encoding mRNAs, with mRNAs of both cohorts displaying noncanonical subcellular partitioning patterns. Unexpectedly, the topogenic signal-encoding mRNA transcriptome was observed to partition in a hierarchical, cohort-specific manner. mRNAs encoding resident proteins of the endomembrane system were clustered at high ER-enrichment values, whereas mRNAs encoding secretory pathway cargo were broadly represented on free and ER-bound ribosomes. Two distinct modes of mRNA association with the ER were identified. mRNAs encoding endomembrane-resident proteins were bound via direct, ribosome-independent interactions, whereas mRNAs encoding secretory cargo displayed predominantly ribosome-dependent modes of ER association. These data indicate that mRNAs are partitioned between the cytosol and ER compartments via a hierarchical system of intrinsic and encoded topogenic signals and identify mRNA cohort-restricted modes of mRNA association with the ER.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of membrane protein biogenesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C1161-C1161
Author(s):  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Protein Biogenesis ◽  
Cargo Proteins ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Hydrophobic Nature ◽  
Correct Target ◽  
Srp Rna

More than 25% of the cellular proteome comprise membrane proteins that have to be inserted into the correct target membrane. Most membrane proteins are delivered to the membrane by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway which relies on the recognition of an N-terminal signal sequence. In contrast to this co-translational mechanism, which avoids problems due to the hydrophobic nature of the cargo proteins, tail-anchored (TA) membrane proteins utilize a post-translational mechanism for membrane insertion – the GET pathway (guided entry of tail-anchored membrane proteins). The SRP and GET pathways are both regulated by GTP and ATP binding proteins of the SIMIBI family. However, in the SRP pathway the SRP RNA plays a unique regulatory role. Recent insights into eukaryotic SRP will be discussed.

scholarly journals Early encounters of a nascent membrane protein

2005 ◽  
Vol 170 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith N.G. Houben ◽  
Raz Zarivach ◽  
Bauke Oudega ◽  
Joen Luirink
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Inner Membrane Protein

An unbiased photo–cross-linking approach was used to probe the “molecular path” of a growing nascent Escherichia coli inner membrane protein (IMP) from the peptidyl transferase center to the surface of the ribosome. The nascent chain was initially in proximity to the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 and subsequently contacted L23, which is indicative of progression through the ribosome via the main ribosomal tunnel. The signal recognition particle (SRP) started to interact with the nascent IMP and to target the ribosome–nascent chain complex to the Sec–YidC complex in the inner membrane when maximally half of the transmembrane domain (TM) was exposed from the ribosomal exit. The combined data suggest a flexible tunnel that may accommodate partially folded nascent proteins and parts of the SRP and SecY. Intraribosomal contacts of the nascent chain were not influenced by the presence of a functional TM in the ribosome.

scholarly journals SRP19 Is a Dispensable Component of the Signal Recognition Particle in Archaea

2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 276-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Yurist ◽  
Idit Dahan ◽  
Jerry Eichler
Keyword(s):  
Cell Growth ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Protein Secretion ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Haloferax Volcanii ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Protein Insertion ◽  
Membrane Protein Insertion ◽  
Srp Rna

ABSTRACT In vitro, archaeal SRP54 binds SRP RNA in the absence of SRP19, suggesting the latter to be expendable in Archaea. Accordingly, the Haloferax volcanii SRP19 gene was deleted. Although normally transcribed at a level comparable to that of the essential SRP54 gene, SRP19 deletion had no effect on cell growth, membrane protein insertion, protein secretion, or ribosome levels. The absence of SRP19 did, however, increase membrane bacterioruberin levels.

scholarly journals GTP-binding proteins may stimulate insulin biosynthesis in rat pancreatic islets by enhancing the signal-recognition-particle-dependent translocation of the insulin mRNA poly-/mono-some complex to the endoplasmic reticulum

1991 ◽  
Vol 275 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Welsh ◽  
C Oberg ◽  
M Welsh
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Insulin Biosynthesis ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Insulin Synthesis ◽  
Gtp Binding Proteins ◽  
Gtp Binding ◽  
Insulin Mrna

We aimed to elucidate the putative role of GTP-binding proteins in the regulation of insulin biosynthesis. For this purpose, freshly isolated rat islets were incubated in the presence of liposomes containing GDP, guanosine 5′-[beta-thio]diphosphate (GDP[S]), GTP, guanosine 5′-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTP[S]), guanosine 5′-[beta gamma-methylene]triphosphate (p[CH2]ppG), guanosine 5′[beta gamma-imido]triphosphate (p[NH]ppG) and ATP, and the effects of the liposomal delivery of these substances on rates of biosynthesis of insulin and total protein were determined. Insulin biosynthesis during a 1 h incubation at 1.67 mM-glucose was stimulated by ATP- and GTP[S]-containing liposomes as compared with control liposomes. At 16.7 mM-glucose, only the GTP[S]-containing liposomes stimulated insulin biosynthesis. No inhibition of islet protein and insulin synthesis was observed with GDP-, GDP[S]-, p[CH2]ppG- and p[NH]ppG-containing liposomes. By determining the subcellular distribution of insulin mRNA, it was found that the mRNA content associated with microsomes was increased and that associated with the cytosolic mono-/poly-somes decreased when the islets were incubated with GTP[S]-containing liposomes, resulting in an approximate doubling of the ratio of microsomal to polysomal-associated insulin mRNA. ATP-containing liposomes produced no effects on the association of insulin mRNA with microsomes. By using photoaffinity labelling and immunoprecipitation techniques, specific binding of GTP[35S] to the alpha-subunit of the signal-recognition particle (SRP) receptor in islet homogenates containing physiological concentrations of GTP and GDP was demonstrated. These findings suggest that the GTP-binding subunit(s) of the SRP receptor, and possibly also of other GTP-binding proteins involved in this process, may regulate insulin biosynthesis by stimulating the translocation of insulin mRNA to the endoplasmic reticulum and by increasing preproinsulin-peptide translocation into the lumen of the reticulum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document