scholarly journals Cyclic AMP negatively controls c-myc transcription and G1 cell cycle progression in p210 BCR-ABL transformed cells: inhibitory activity exerted through cyclin D1 and cdk4

Leukemia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
EA Williamson ◽  
GS Burgess ◽  
P Eder ◽  
S Litz-Jackson ◽  
H Scott Boswell
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Foster ◽  
Donald C. Henley ◽  
Antonin Bukovsky ◽  
Prem Seth ◽  
Jay Wimalasena

ABSTRACT Estrogens induce proliferation of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells by stimulating G1/S transition associated with increased cyclin D1 expression, activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). We have utilized blockade of cyclin D1-Cdk4 complex formation through adenovirus-mediated expression of p16INK4a to demonstrate that estrogen regulates Cdk inhibitor expression and expression of the Cdk-activating phosphatase Cdc25A independent of cyclin D1-Cdk4 function and cell cycle progression. Expression of p16INK4a inhibited G1/S transition induced in MCF-7 cells by 17-β-estradiol (E2) with associated inhibition of both Cdk4- and Cdk2-associated kinase activities. Inhibition of Cdk2 activity was associated with delayed removal of Cdk-inhibitory activity in early G1 and decreased cyclin A expression. Cdk-inhibitory activity and expression of both p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 was decreased, however, in both control and p16INK4a-expressing cells 20 h after estrogen treatment. Expression of Cdc25A mRNA and protein was induced by E2 in control and p16INK4a-expressing MCF-7 cells; however, functional activity of Cdc25A was inhibited in cells expressing p16INK4a. Inhibition of Cdc25A activity in p16INK4a-expressing cells was associated with depressed Cdk2 activity and was reversed in vivo and in vitro by active Cdk2. Transfection of MCF-7 cells with a dominant-negative Cdk2 construct inhibited the E2-dependent activation of ectopic Cdc25A. Supporting a role for Cdc25A in estrogen action, antisenseCDC25A oligonucleotides inhibited estrogen-induced Cdk2 activation and DNA synthesis. In addition, inactive cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes from p16INK4a-expressing, estrogen-treated cells were activated in vitro by treatment with recombinant Cdc25A and in vivo in cells overexpressing Cdc25A. The results demonstrate that functional association of cyclin D1-Cdk4 complexes is required for Cdk2 activation in MCF-7 cells and that Cdk2 activity is, in turn, required for the in vivo activation of Cdc25A. These studies establish Cdc25A as a growth-promoting target of estrogen action and further indicate that estrogens independently regulate multiple components of the cell cycle machinery, including expression of p21Cip1 and p27Kip1.


Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. O’Connor ◽  
Tanay Thakar ◽  
Claudia M. Nicolae ◽  
George-Lucian Moldovan

Cell Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 107464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Hirayama ◽  
Fan-Yan Wei ◽  
Takeshi Chujo ◽  
Shinya Oki ◽  
Maya Yakita ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertram Poch ◽  
Frank Gansauge ◽  
Andreas Schwarz ◽  
Thomas Seufferlein ◽  
Thomas Schnelldorfer ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hitomi ◽  
Dennis W. Stacey

ABSTRACT Novel techniques were used to determine when in the cell cycle of proliferating NIH 3T3 cells cellular Ras and cyclin D1 are required. For comparison, in quiescent cells, all four of the inhibitors of cell cycle progression tested (anti-Ras, anti-cyclin D1, serum removal, and cycloheximide) became ineffective at essentially the same point in G1 phase, approximately 4 h prior to the beginning of DNA synthesis. To extend these studies to cycling cells, a time-lapse approach was used to determine the approximate cell cycle position of individual cells in an asynchronous culture at the time of inhibitor treatment and then to determine the effects of the inhibitor upon recipient cells. With this approach, anti-Ras antibody efficiently inhibited entry into S phase only when introduced into cells prior to the preceding mitosis, several hours before the beginning of S phase. Anti-cyclin D1, on the other hand, was an efficient inhibitor when introduced up until just before the initiation of DNA synthesis. Cycloheximide treatment, like anti-cyclin D1 microinjection, was inhibitory throughout G1 phase (which lasts a total of 4 to 5 h in these cells). Finally, serum removal blocked entry into S phase only during the first hour following mitosis. Kinetic analysis and a novel dual-labeling technique were used to confirm the differences in cell cycle requirements for Ras, cyclin D1, and cycloheximide. These studies demonstrate a fundamental difference in mitogenic signal transduction between quiescent and cycling NIH 3T3 cells and reveal a sequence of signaling events required for cell cycle progression in proliferating NIH 3T3 cells.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan Sun ◽  
Lei Shi ◽  
Shushan Yan ◽  
Zhengqiang Wan ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
...  

Aim. To investigate the role and mechanism of miR-15b in the proliferation and apoptosis of glioma.Methods. The miR-15b mimics were transfected into human glioma cells to upregulate the miR-15b expression. Cyclin D1 was determined by both western blotting analysis and luciferase reporter assay. Methylthiazol tetrazolium (MTT) and flow cytometry were employed to detect the cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis.Results. Overexpression of miR-15b inhibits proliferation by arrested cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis, possibly by directly targeting Cyclin D1. Both luciferase assay and bioinformatics search revealed a putative target site of miR-15b binding to the 3′-UTR of Cyclin D1. Moreover, expression of miR-15b in glioma tissues was found to be inversely correlated with Cyclin D1 expression. Enforced Cyclin D1 could abrogate the miR-15b-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.Conclusions. Our findings identified that miR-15b may function as a glioma suppressor by targeting the Cyclin D1, which may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of glioma.


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3577-3587 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Musgrove ◽  
J A Hamilton ◽  
C S Lee ◽  
K J Sweeney ◽  
C K Watts ◽  
...  

Cyclins and proto-oncogenes including c-myc have been implicated in eukaryotic cell cycle control. The role of cyclins in steroidal regulation of cell proliferation is unknown, but a role for c-myc has been suggested. This study investigated the relationship between regulation of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression, particularly by steroids and their antagonists, and changes in the levels of expression of these genes. Sequential induction of cyclins D1 (early G1 phase), D3, E, A (late G1-early S phase), and B1 (G2 phase) was observed following insulin stimulation of cell cycle progression in serum-free medium. Transient acceleration of G1-phase cells by progestin was also accompanied by rapid induction of cyclin D1, apparent within 2 h. This early induction of cyclin D1 and the ability of delayed administration of antiprogestin to antagonize progestin-induced increases in both cyclin D1 mRNA and the proportion of cells in S phase support a central role for cyclin D1 in mediating the mitogenic response in T-47D cells. Compatible with this hypothesis, antiestrogen treatment reduced the expression of cyclin D1 approximately 8 h before changes in cell cycle phase distribution accompanying growth inhibition. In the absence of progestin, antiprogestin treatment inhibited T-47D cell cycle progression but in contrast did not decrease cyclin D1 expression. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 gene expression are often, but not invariably, associated with changes in the rate of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression. However, both antiestrogen and antiprogestin depleted c-myc mRNA by > 80% within 2 h. These data suggest the involvement of both cyclin D1 and c-myc in the steroidal control of breast cancer cell cycle progression.


1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1258-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Terada ◽  
Seiji Inoshita ◽  
Osamu Nakashima ◽  
Michio Kuwahara ◽  
Sei Sasaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document