Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein–protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein–protein docking

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (32) ◽  
pp. 22129-22139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu Chen ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Huiyong Sun ◽  
Peichen Pan ◽  
Youyong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Free Energies

Understanding protein–protein interactions (PPIs) is quite important to elucidate crucial biological processes and even design compounds that interfere with PPIs with pharmaceutical significance.

Accounting for conformational entropy in predicting binding free energies of protein-protein interactions

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hetunandan Kamisetty ◽  
Arvind Ramanathan ◽  
Chris Bailey-Kellogg ◽  
Christopher James Langmead
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Conformational Entropy ◽  
Binding Free Energies

PROBselect: accurate prediction of protein-binding residues from proteins sequences via dynamic predictor selection

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. i735-i744
Author(s):  
Fuhao Zhang ◽  
Wenbo Shi ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Min Zeng ◽  
Min Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cross Prediction ◽  
Predictive Quality ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Binding Residues

Abstract Motivation Knowledge of protein-binding residues (PBRs) improves our understanding of protein−protein interactions, contributes to the prediction of protein functions and facilitates protein−protein docking calculations. While many sequence-based predictors of PBRs were published, they offer modest levels of predictive performance and most of them cross-predict residues that interact with other partners. One unexplored option to improve the predictive quality is to design consensus predictors that combine results produced by multiple methods. Results We empirically investigate predictive performance of a representative set of nine predictors of PBRs. We report substantial differences in predictive quality when these methods are used to predict individual proteins, which contrast with the dataset-level benchmarks that are currently used to assess and compare these methods. Our analysis provides new insights for the cross-prediction concern, dissects complementarity between predictors and demonstrates that predictive performance of the top methods depends on unique characteristics of the input protein sequence. Using these insights, we developed PROBselect, first-of-its-kind consensus predictor of PBRs. Our design is based on the dynamic predictor selection at the protein level, where the selection relies on regression-based models that accurately estimate predictive performance of selected predictors directly from the sequence. Empirical assessment using a low-similarity test dataset shows that PROBselect provides significantly improved predictive quality when compared with the current predictors and conventional consensuses that combine residue-level predictions. Moreover, PROBselect informs the users about the expected predictive quality for the prediction generated from a given input protein. Availability and implementation PROBselect is available at http://bioinformatics.csu.edu.cn/PROBselect/home/index. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Decoding Protein-protein Interactions: An Overview

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 855-882
Author(s):  
Olivia Slater ◽  
Bethany Miller ◽  
Maria Kontoyianni
Keyword(s):  
Drug Discovery ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Drug Repurposing ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Target Space ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
X Ray Crystallography ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Interaction Sites ◽  
Long Time

Drug discovery has focused on the paradigm “one drug, one target” for a long time. However, small molecules can act at multiple macromolecular targets, which serves as the basis for drug repurposing. In an effort to expand the target space, and given advances in X-ray crystallography, protein-protein interactions have become an emerging focus area of drug discovery enterprises. Proteins interact with other biomolecules and it is this intricate network of interactions that determines the behavior of the system and its biological processes. In this review, we briefly discuss networks in disease, followed by computational methods for protein-protein complex prediction. Computational methodologies and techniques employed towards objectives such as protein-protein docking, protein-protein interactions, and interface predictions are described extensively. Docking aims at producing a complex between proteins, while interface predictions identify a subset of residues on one protein that could interact with a partner, and protein-protein interaction sites address whether two proteins interact. In addition, approaches to predict hot spots and binding sites are presented along with a representative example of our internal project on the chemokine CXC receptor 3 B-isoform and predictive modeling with IP10 and PF4.

An Integrated Prediction Method for Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-286
Author(s):  
Chang Xu ◽  
Limin Jiang ◽  
Zehua Zhang ◽  
Xuyao Yu ◽  
Renhai Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Feature Vector ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Feature Representation ◽  
Protein Interaction Networks ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Integrated Learning ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Training Process

Background: Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs) play a key role in various biological processes. Many methods have been developed to predict protein-protein interactions and protein interaction networks. However, many existing applications are limited, because of relying on a large number of homology proteins and interaction marks. Methods: In this paper, we propose a novel integrated learning approach (RF-Ada-DF) with the sequence-based feature representation, for identifying protein-protein interactions. Our method firstly constructs a sequence-based feature vector to represent each pair of proteins, viaMultivariate Mutual Information (MMI) and Normalized Moreau-Broto Autocorrelation (NMBAC). Then, we feed the 638- dimentional features into an integrated learning model for judging interaction pairs and non-interaction pairs. Furthermore, this integrated model embeds Random Forest in AdaBoost framework and turns weak classifiers into a single strong classifier. Meanwhile, we also employ double fault detection in order to suppress over-adaptation during the training process. Results: To evaluate the performance of our method, we conduct several comprehensive tests for PPIs prediction. On the H. pyloridataset, our method achieves 88.16% accuracy and 87.68% sensitivity, the accuracy of our method is increased by 0.57%. On the S. cerevisiaedataset, our method achieves 95.77% accuracy and 93.36% sensitivity, the accuracy of our method is increased by 0.76%. On the Humandataset, our method achieves 98.16% accuracy and 96.80% sensitivity, the accuracy of our method is increased by 0.6%. Experiments show that our method achieves better results than other outstanding methods for sequence-based PPIs prediction. The datasets and codes are available at https://github.com/guofei-tju/RF-Ada-DF.git.

scholarly journals Mass spectrometry-based cross-linking study shows that the Psb28 protein binds to cytochrome b559 in Photosystem II

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (9) ◽  
pp. 2224-2229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Weisz ◽  
Haijun Liu ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Sundarapandian Thangapandian ◽  
Emad Tajkhorshid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Photosystem Ii ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cytochrome B559 ◽  
Reaction Center Complex ◽  
Assembly Intermediate

Photosystem II (PSII), a large pigment protein complex, undergoes rapid turnover under natural conditions. During assembly of PSII, oxidative damage to vulnerable assembly intermediate complexes must be prevented. Psb28, the only cytoplasmic extrinsic protein in PSII, protects the RC47 assembly intermediate of PSII and assists its efficient conversion into functional PSII. Its role is particularly important under stress conditions when PSII damage occurs frequently. Psb28 is not found, however, in any PSII crystal structure, and its structural location has remained unknown. In this study, we used chemical cross-linking combined with mass spectrometry to capture the transient interaction of Psb28 with PSII. We detected three cross-links between Psb28 and the α- and β-subunits of cytochrome b559, an essential component of the PSII reaction-center complex. These distance restraints enable us to position Psb28 on the cytosolic surface of PSII directly above cytochrome b559, in close proximity to the QB site. Protein–protein docking results also support Psb28 binding in this region. Determination of the Psb28 binding site and other biochemical evidence allow us to propose a mechanism by which Psb28 exerts its protective effect on the RC47 intermediate. This study also shows that isotope-encoded cross-linking with the “mass tags” selection criteria allows confident identification of more cross-linked peptides in PSII than has been previously reported. This approach thus holds promise to identify other transient protein–protein interactions in membrane protein complexes.

scholarly journals Protein-protein docking using learned three-dimensional representations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgy Derevyanko ◽  
Guillaume Lamoureux
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Network Architecture ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Translational Invariance ◽  
Shape Complementarity ◽  
Spatial Features

AbstractProtein-protein interactions are determined by a number of hard-to-capture features related to shape complementarity, electrostatics, and hydrophobicity. These features may be intrinsic to the protein or induced by the presence of a partner. A conventional approach to protein-protein docking consists in engineering a small number of spatial features for each protein, and in minimizing the sum of their correlations with respect to the spatial arrangement of the two proteins. To generalize this approach, we introduce a deep neural network architecture that transforms the raw atomic densities of each protein into complex three-dimensional representations. Each point in the volume containing the protein is described by 48 learned features, which are correlated and combined with the features of a second protein to produce a score dependent on the relative position and orientation of the two proteins. The architecture is based on multiple layers of SE(3)-equivariant convolutional neural networks, which provide built-in rotational and translational invariance of the score with respect to the structure of the complex. The model is trained end-to-end on a set of decoy conformations generated from 851 nonredundant protein-protein complexes and is tested on data from the Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark Version 4.0.

scholarly journals Mechanism of the G-protein mimetic nanobody binding to a muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (12) ◽  
pp. 3036-3041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinglong Miao ◽  
J. Andrew McCammon
Keyword(s):  
Protein Binding ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Md Simulations ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intracellular Loops ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Protein–protein binding is key in cellular signaling processes. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of protein–protein binding, however, are challenging due to limited timescales. In particular, binding of the medically important G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with intracellular signaling proteins has not been simulated with MD to date. Here, we report a successful simulation of the binding of a G-protein mimetic nanobody to the M2 muscarinic GPCR using the robust Gaussian accelerated MD (GaMD) method. Through long-timescale GaMD simulations over 4,500 ns, the nanobody was observed to bind the receptor intracellular G-protein-coupling site, with a minimum rmsd of 2.48 Å in the nanobody core domain compared with the X-ray structure. Binding of the nanobody allosterically closed the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket, being consistent with the recent experimental finding. In the absence of nanobody binding, the receptor orthosteric pocket sampled open and fully open conformations. The GaMD simulations revealed two low-energy intermediate states during nanobody binding to the M2 receptor. The flexible receptor intracellular loops contribute remarkable electrostatic, polar, and hydrophobic residue interactions in recognition and binding of the nanobody. These simulations provided important insights into the mechanism of GPCR–nanobody binding and demonstrated the applicability of GaMD in modeling dynamic protein–protein interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document