scholarly journals The role of alternative testing strategies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Hjorth ◽  
Patricia A. Holden ◽  
Steffen Foss Hansen ◽  
Benjamin P. Colman ◽  
Khara Grieger ◽  
...  

Within toxicology there is a pressure to find new test systems to replace, reduce and refine animal testing. In nanoecotoxicology this raises a number of questions.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Yin Sun ◽  
Gulliver Conroy ◽  
Erica Donner ◽  
Konrad Hungerbühler ◽  
Enzo Lombi ◽  
...  

For the environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) knowledge about environmental concentrations is crucial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1150-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicja Mikolajczyk ◽  
Agnieszka Gajewicz ◽  
Ewa Mulkiewicz ◽  
Bakhtiyor Rasulev ◽  
Martyna Marchelek ◽  
...  

The human health and environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials (NPs) is nowadays of high interest.


NanoImpact ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 66-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie Auffan ◽  
Armand Masion ◽  
Catherine Mouneyrac ◽  
Camille de Garidel-Thoron ◽  
Christine Ogilvie Hendren ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gajewicz ◽  
K. Jagiello ◽  
M. T. D. Cronin ◽  
J. Leszczynski ◽  
T. Puzyn

The development ofin silicomethods that support human health and environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials is nowadays of high interest, because the application of those methods enables to fill the existing experimental data gaps.


Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1370
Author(s):  
Raisibe Florence Lehutso ◽  
Yolanda Tancu ◽  
Arjun Maity ◽  
Melusi Thwala

Analytical limitations have constrained the determination of nanopollution character from real-world sources such as nano-enabled products (NEPs), thus hindering the development of environmental safety guidelines for engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). This study examined the properties of ENMs in 18 commercial products: sunscreens, personal care products, clothing, and paints—products exhibiting medium to a high potential for environmental nanopollution. It was found that 17 of the products contained ENMs; 9, 3, 3, and 2 were incorporated with nTiO2, nAg, binaries of nZnO + nTiO2, and nTiO2 + nAg, respectively. Commonly, the nTiO2 were elongated or angular, whereas nAg and nZnO were near-spherical and angular in morphology, respectively. The size ranges (width × length) were 7–48 × 14–200, 34–35 × 37–38, and 18–28 nm for nTiO2, nZnO, and nAg respectively. All ENMs were negatively charged. The total concentration of Ti, Zn, and Ag in the NEPs were 2.3 × 10−4–4.3%, 3.4–4.3%, and 1.0 × 10−4–11.3 × 10−3%, respectively. The study determined some key ENM characteristics required for environmental risk assessment; however, challenges persist regarding the accurate determination of the concentration in NEPs. Overall, the study confirmed NEPs as actual sources of nanopollution; hence, scenario-specific efforts are recommended to quantify their loads into water resources.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin H. Walker

Animal welfare organisations have long been concerned about the use of animals for ecotoxicity testing. Ecotoxicity testing is a necessary part of the statutory risk assessment of chemicals that may be released into the environment. It is sometimes also carried out during the development of new chemicals and in the investigation of pollution in the field. This review considers the existing requirements for ecotoxicity testing, with particular reference to practices in the European Union, including the recent REACH system proposals, before discussing criticisms that have been made of existing practices for environmental risk assessment. These criticisms have been made on scientific and ethical grounds, as well as on questions of cost. A case is made for greater investment in the development of alternative testing methods, which could improve the science, as well as serving the cause of animal welfare. It has frequently been suggested that the statutory requirements for environmental risk assessment are too rigid and bureaucratic. A case is made for flexibility and the greater involvement of scientists in the risk assessment procedure, in the interests of both improved science and improved animal welfare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document