Regulation of chloroplast translation: interactions of RNA elements, RNA-binding proteins and the plastid ribosome

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Manuell ◽  
M.V. Beligni ◽  
K. Yamaguchi ◽  
S.P. Mayfield
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Chloroplast Gene Expression ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Chloroplast Translation ◽  
Rna Elements ◽  
Translational Apparatus ◽  
Mrna Binding

Chloroplast gene expression is primarily controlled during the translation of plastid mRNAs into proteins, and genetic studies have identified cis-acting RNA elements and trans-acting protein factors required for chloroplast translation. Biochemical analysis has identified both general and specific mRNA-binding proteins as components of the regulation of chloroplast translation, and has revealed that chloroplast translation is related to bacterial translation but is more complex. Utilizing proteomic and bioinformatic analyses, we have identified the proteins that function in chloroplast translation, including a complete set of chloroplast ribosomal proteins, and homologues of the 70 S initiation, elongation and termination factors. These analyses show that the translational apparatus of chloroplasts is related to that of bacteria, but has adopted a number of eukaryotic mechanisms to facilitate and regulate chloroplast translation.

scholarly journals The endoplasmic reticulum-associated mRNA-binding proteins ERBP1 and ERBP2 interact in bloodstream-form Trypanosoma brucei

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bajak ◽  
Kevin Leiss ◽  
Christine Clayton ◽  
Esteban Erben
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bloodstream Form ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

AbstractKinetoplastids rely heavily on post-transcriptional mechanisms for control of gene expression, and on RNA-binding proteins that regulate mRNA splicing, translation and decay. Trypanosoma brucei ERBP1 (Tb927.10.14150) and ERBP2 (Tb927.9.9550) were previously identified as mRNA binding proteins that lack canonical RNA-binding domains. We here show that ERBP1 is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, like ERBP2, and that the two proteins interact in vivo. Loss of ERBP1 from bloodstream-form T. brucei initially resulted in a growth defect but proliferation was restored after more prolonged cultivation. Results from a pull-down of tagged ERBP1 suggest that it preferentially binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. The ERBP1 sequence resembles that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bfr1, which also localises to the endoplasmic reticulum and binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. However, unlike Bfr1, ERBP1 does not bind to mRNAs encoding secreted proteins, and it is also not recruited to stress granules after starvation.

Subcellular localization and RNP formation of IGF2BPs (IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins) is modulated by distinct RNA-binding domains

2013 ◽  
Vol 394 (8) ◽  
pp. 1077-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Wächter ◽  
Marcel Köhn ◽  
Nadine Stöhr ◽  
Stefan Hüttelmaier
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Structural Constraints ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Mrna Binding

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding protein family (IGF2BPs) directs the cytoplasmic fate of various target mRNAs and controls essential cellular functions. The three IGF2BP paralogues expressed in mammals comprise two RNA-recognition motifs (RRM) as well as four KH domains. How these domains direct IGF2BP paralogue-dependent protein function remains largely elusive. In this study, we analyze the role of KH domains in IGF2BPs by the mutational GXXG-GEEG conversion of single KH domain loops in the context of full-length polypeptides. These analyses reveal that all four KH domains of IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP2 are essentially involved in RNA-binding in vitro and the cellular association with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Moreover the KH domains prevent the nuclear accumulation of these two paralogues and facilitate their recruitment to stress granules. The role of KH domains appears less pronounced in IGF2BP3, because GxxG-GEEG conversion in all four KH domains only modestly affects RNA-binding, subcellular localization and RNA-dependent protein association of this paralogue. These findings indicate paralogue-dependent RNA-binding properties of IGF2BPs which likely direct distinct cellular functions. Our findings suggest that IGF2BPs contact target RNAs via all four KH domains. This implies significant structural constraints, which presumably allow the formation of exceedingly stable protein-RNA complexes.

scholarly journals An Interaction between Two RNA Binding Proteins, Nab2 and Pub1, Links mRNA Processing/Export and mRNA Stability

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 6569-6579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano H. Apponi ◽  
Seth M. Kelly ◽  
Michelle T. Harreman ◽  
Alexander N. Lehner ◽  
Anita H. Corbett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Stability ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tail Length ◽  
Functional Link ◽  
Mrna Binding Protein ◽  
Mrna Binding

ABSTRACT mRNA stability is modulated by elements in the mRNA transcript and their cognate RNA binding proteins. Poly(U) binding protein 1 (Pub1) is a cytoplasmic Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA binding protein that stabilizes transcripts containing AU-rich elements (AREs) or stabilizer elements (STEs). In a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified nuclear poly(A) binding protein 2 (Nab2) as being a Pub1-interacting protein. Nab2 is an essential nucleocytoplasmic shuttling mRNA binding protein that regulates poly(A) tail length and mRNA export. The interaction between Pub1 and Nab2 was confirmed by copurification and in vitro binding assays. The interaction is mediated by the Nab2 zinc finger domain. Analysis of the functional link between these proteins reveals that Nab2, like Pub1, can modulate the stability of specific mRNA transcripts. The half-life of the RPS16B transcript, an ARE-like sequence-containing Pub1 target, is decreased in both nab2-1 and nab2-67 mutants. In contrast, GCN4, an STE-containing Pub1 target, is not affected. Similar results were obtained for other ARE- and STE-containing Pub1 target transcripts. Further analysis reveals that the ARE-like sequence is necessary for Nab2-mediated transcript stabilization. These results suggest that Nab2 functions together with Pub1 to modulate mRNA stability and strengthen a model where nuclear events are coupled to the control of mRNA turnover in the cytoplasm.

scholarly journals Abstract P-22: Enhanced Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (Eclip) Data Reveal Interactions of RNA Binding Proteins with the Human Ribosome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S21-S21
Author(s):  
Andrey Buyan ◽  
Ivan Kulakovskiy ◽  
Sergey Dmitriev
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Structural Data

Background: The ribosome is a protein-synthesizing molecular machine composed of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and dozens of ribosomal proteins. In mammals, the ribosome has a complicated structure with an additional outer layer of rRNA, including large tentacle-like extensions. A number of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) interact with this layer to assist ribosome biogenesis, nuclear export and decay, or to modulate translation. Plenty of methods have been developed in the last decade in order to study such protein-RNA interactions, including RNA pulldown and crosslinking-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) assays. Methods: In the current study, using publicly available data of the enhanced CLIP (eCLIP) experiments for 223 proteins studied in the ENCODE project, we found a number of RBPs that bind rRNAs in human cells. To locate their binding sites in rRNAs, we used a newly developed computational protocol for mapping and evaluation of the eCLIP data with the respect to the repetitive sequences. Results: For two proteins with known ribosomal localization, uS3/RPS3 and uS17/RPS11, the identified sites were in good agreement with structural data, thus validating our approach. Then, we identified rRNA contacts of overall 22 RBPs involved in rRNA processing and ribosome maturation (DDX21, DDX51, DDX52, NIP7, SBDS, UTP18, UTP3, WDR3, and WDR43), translational control during stress (SERBP1, G3BP1, SND1), IRES activity (PCBP1/hnRNPE1), and other translation-related functions. In many cases, the identified proteins interact with the rRNA expansion segments (ES) of the human ribosome pointing to their important role in protein synthesis. Conclusion: Our study identifies a number of RBPs as interacting partners of the human ribosome and sheds light on the role of rRNA expansion segments in translation.

scholarly journals Combinatorial recognition of clustered RNA elements by a multidomain RNA-binding protein, IMP3

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Schneider ◽  
Lee-Hsueh Hung ◽  
Masood Aziz ◽  
Anna Wilmen ◽  
Stephanie Thaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Systematic Strategy ◽  
Rna Elements ◽  
Target Rna

AbstractHow multidomain RNA-binding proteins recognize their specific target sequences, based on a combinatorial code, represents a fundamental unsolved question and has not been studied systematically so far. Here we focus on a prototypical multidomain RNA-binding protein, IMP3 (also called IGF2BP3), which contains six RNA-binding domains (RBDs): four KH and two RRM domains. We have established an integrative systematic strategy, combining single-domain-resolved SELEX-seq, motif-spacing analyses, in vivo iCLIP, functional validation assays, and structural biology. This approach identifies the RNA-binding specificity and RNP topology of IMP3, involving all six RBDs and a cluster of up to five distinct and appropriately spaced CA-rich and GGC-core RNA elements, covering a >100 nucleotide-long target RNA region. Our generally applicable approach explains both specificity and flexibility of IMP3-RNA recognition, providing a paradigm for the function of multivalent interactions with multidomain RNA-binding proteins in gene regulation.

scholarly journals Binding patterns of RNA-binding proteins to repeat-derived RNA sequences reveal putative functional RNA elements

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Onoguchi ◽  
Chao Zeng ◽  
Ayako Matsumaru ◽  
Michiaki Hamada
Keyword(s):  
Rna Splicing ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Noncoding Rnas ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Rna Elements ◽  
Long Interspersed Element ◽  
Functional Rna

Abstract Recent reports have revealed that repeat-derived sequences embedded in introns or long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are targets of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and contribute to biological processes such as RNA splicing or transcriptional regulation. These findings suggest that repeat-derived RNAs are important as scaffolds of RBPs and functional elements. However, the overall functional sequences of the repeat-derived RNAs are not fully understood. Here, we show the putative functional repeat-derived RNAs by analyzing the binding patterns of RBPs based on ENCODE eCLIP data. We mapped all eCLIP reads to repeat sequences and observed that 10.75 % and 7.04 % of reads on average were enriched (at least 2-fold over control) in the repeats in K562 and HepG2 cells, respectively. Using these data, we predicted functional RNA elements on the sense and antisense strands of long interspersed element 1 (LINE1) sequences. Furthermore, we found several new sets of RBPs on fragments derived from other transposable element (TE) families. Some of these fragments show specific and stable secondary structures and are found to be inserted into the introns of genes or lncRNAs. These results suggest that the repeat-derived RNA sequences are strong candidates for the functional RNA elements of endogenous noncoding RNAs.

scholarly journals RNA-Binding Proteins as Important Regulators of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Jonas ◽  
George A. Calin ◽  
Martin Pichler
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Mrna Binding

The majority of the genome is transcribed into pieces of non-(protein) coding RNA, among which long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) constitute a large group of particularly versatile molecules that govern basic cellular processes including transcription, splicing, RNA stability, and translation. The frequent deregulation of numerous lncRNAs in cancer is known to contribute to virtually all hallmarks of cancer. An important regulatory mechanism of lncRNAs is the post-transcriptional regulation mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). So far, however, only a small number of known cancer-associated lncRNAs have been found to be regulated by the interaction with RBPs like human antigen R (HuR), ARE/poly(U)-binding/degradation factor 1 (AUF1), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1), and tristetraprolin (TTP). These RBPs regulate, by various means, two aspects in particular, namely the stability and the localization of lncRNAs. Importantly, these RBPs themselves are commonly deregulated in cancer and might thus play a major role in the deregulation of cancer-related lncRNAs. There are, however, still many open questions, for example regarding the context specificity of these regulatory mechanisms that, in part, is based on the synergistic or competitive interaction between different RBPs. There is also a lack of knowledge on how RBPs facilitate the transport of lncRNAs between different cellular compartments.

scholarly journals Expression of IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins (IMPs) in gonads and testicular cancer

Reproduction ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels A Hammer ◽  
Thomas v O Hansen ◽  
Anne Grete Byskov ◽  
Eva Rajpert-De Meyts ◽  
Marie Louise Grøndahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Human Testis ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 (IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3) belong to a family of RNA-binding proteins implicated in mRNA localization, turnover and translational control. We examined their expression pattern during development of murine and human testis and ovaries. In the mouse, IMPs were expressed in male and female gonadal cells at embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5). From E16.5, IMP1 and IMP3 became restricted to the developing germ cells, whereas IMP2 expression persisted in the interstitial cells. In mature mouse and human ovaries, IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3 were detected in resting and growing oocytes and in the granulosa cells. In testis, IMP1 and IMP3 were found mainly in the spermatogonia, whereas IMP2 was expressed in the immature Leydig cells. Moreover, all three IMPs were detected in human semen. The developmental expression pattern of IMP1 and IMP3 in the human testis prompted us to examine their possible involvement in testicular neoplasia. IMPs were detected primarily in germ-cell neoplasms, including preinvasive testicular carcinoma in situ, classical and spermatocytic seminoma, and nonseminomas, with particularly high expression in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma. The relative expression of IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3 varied among tumor types and only IMP1 was detected in all carcinoma in situ cells. Thus IMPs, and in particular IMP1, may be useful auxiliary markers of testicular neoplasia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document