scholarly journals Dual-Task Effects on Story Retell for Participants With Moderate, Mild, or No Aphasia: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1890-1905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyson G. Harmon ◽  
Adam Jacks ◽  
Katarina L. Haley ◽  
Antoine Bailliard
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Speech Rate ◽  
Narrative Discourse ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Perceived Effort ◽  
Task Effects ◽  
Communication Situations ◽  
Story Retell ◽  
Speed Accuracy

Purpose The aims of the study were to determine dual-task effects on content accuracy, delivery speed, and perceived effort during narrative discourse in people with moderate, mild, or no aphasia and to explore subjective reactions to retelling a story with a concurrent task. Method Two studies (1 quantitative and 1 qualitative) were conducted. In Study 1, participants with mild or moderate aphasia and neurotypical controls retold short stories in isolation and while simultaneously distinguishing between high and low tones. Story retell accuracy (speech productivity and efficiency), speed (speech rate, repetitions, and pauses), and perceived effort were measured and compared. In Study 2, participants completed semistructured interviews about their story retell experience. These interviews were recorded, transcribed orthographically, and coded qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results The dual task interfered more with spoken language of people with aphasia than controls, but different speed–accuracy trade-off patterns were noted. Participants in the moderate aphasia group reduced accuracy with little alteration to speed, whereas participants in the mild aphasia group maintained accuracy and reduced their speed. Participants in both groups also reported more negative emotional and behavioral reactions to the dual-task condition than their neurotypical peers. Intentional strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of the dual-task condition were only reported by participants with mild aphasia. Conclusion The findings suggest that, although communicating with a competing task is more difficult for people with aphasia than neurotypical controls, participants with mild aphasia may be better able to cope with cognitively demanding communication situations than participants with moderate aphasia. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8233391

scholarly journals Speech Fluency in Acquired Apraxia of Speech During Narrative Discourse: Group Comparisons and Dual-Task Effects

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2S) ◽  
pp. 905-914
Author(s):  
Tyson G. Harmon ◽  
Adam Jacks ◽  
Katarina L. Haley
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Load ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Narrative Discourse ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Sample Duration ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Speech Fluency

Purpose Slowed speech and interruptions to the flow of connected speech are common in aphasia. These features are also observed during dual-task performance for neurotypical adults. The purposes of this study were to determine (a) whether indices of fluency related to cognitive–linguistic versus motor processing would differ between speakers with aphasia plus apraxia of speech (AOS) and speakers with aphasia only and (b) whether cognitive load reduces fluency in speakers with aphasia with and without AOS. Method Fourteen speakers with aphasia (7 with AOS) and 7 neurotypical controls retold short stories alone (single task) and while simultaneously distinguishing between a high and a low tone (dual task). Their narrative samples were analyzed for speech fluency according to sample duration, speech rate, pause/fill time, and repetitions per syllable. Results As expected, both speaker groups with aphasia spoke slower and with more pauses than the neurotypical controls. The speakers with AOS produced more repetitions and longer samples than controls, but they did not differ on these measures from the speakers with aphasia without AOS. Relative to the single-task condition, the dual-task condition increased the duration of pauses and fillers for all groups but reduced speaking rate only for the control group. Sample duration and frequency of repetitions did not change in response to cognitive load. Conclusions Speech output in aphasia becomes less fluent when speakers have to engage in simultaneous tasks, as is typical in everyday conversation. Although AOS may lead to more sound and syllable repetitions than normal, speaking tasks other than narrative discourse might better capture this specific type of disfluency. Future research is needed to confirm and expand these preliminary findings. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8847845

2BALANCE: Test-retest reliability of a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Maya Danneels ◽  
Ruth Van Hecke ◽  
Laura Leyssens ◽  
Dirk Cambier ◽  
Raymond van de Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Rotation ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Motor Task ◽  
Mental Rotation Task ◽  
Cognitive Tasks ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

PURPOSE: Aside from typical symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo, persons with vestibular disorders often have cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have been assessed in single-task condition. However, dual-tasks assessing cognitive-motor interference might be an added value as they reflect daily life situations better. Therefore, the 2BALANCE protocol was developed. In the current study, the test-retest reliability of this protocol was assessed. METHODS: The 2BALANCE protocol was performed twice in 20 healthy young adults with an in-between test interval of two weeks. Two motor tasks and five different cognitive tasks were performed in single and dual-task condition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement, and the minimal detectable difference were calculated. RESULTS: All cognitive tasks, with the exception of the mental rotation task, had favorable reliability results (0.26≤ICC≤0.91). The dynamic motor task indicated overall substantial reliability values in all conditions (0.67≤ICC≤0.98). Similar results were found for the static motor task during dual-tasking (0.50≤ICC≤0.92), but were slightly lower in single-task condition (–0.26≤ICC≤0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The 2BALANCE protocol was overall consistent across trials. However, the mental rotation task showed lowest reliability values.

scholarly journals Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Muhle ◽  
Inga Claus ◽  
Bendix Labeit ◽  
Mao Ogawa ◽  
Rainer Dziewas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Task Interference ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Task Effects ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Management Of Dysphagia ◽  
Dual Task Interference

AbstractDysphagia is frequent in many neurological diseases and gives rise to severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia is essential and can reduce mortality. This study investigated the effect of cognitive and motor dual-task interference on swallowing in healthy participants, as dual-task effects are reported for other motor tasks such as gait and speech. 27 participants (17 females; 29.2 ± 4.1 years) were included in this prospective study and examined using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Using a previously established FEES-based score, the paradigms “baseline swallowing”, “cognitive dual-task” and “motor dual-task” were assessed. Scores of the three paradigms were compared using a repetitive measures ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. Mean baseline swallowing score in single task was 5 ± 3. It worsened to 6 ± 5 in the cognitive (p = 0.118), and to 8 ± 5 in the motor dual-task condition (p < 0.001). This change was driven by subclinical worsening of premature bolus spillage and pharyngeal residue. Oropharyngeal swallowing is not exclusively reflexive in nature but requires attention, which leads to motor dual-task interference. This has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications, e.g. in the early screening for dysphagia or in avoiding dual-task situations while eating.

scholarly journals Impaired attentional modulation of sensorimotor control and cortical excitability in schizophrenia

Brain ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (7) ◽  
pp. 2149-2164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loïc Carment ◽  
Lucile Dupin ◽  
Laura Guedj ◽  
Maxime Térémetz ◽  
Marie-Odile Krebs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Tracking Error ◽  
Sensorimotor Control ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Force Tracking

Abstract Impairments in attentional, working memory and sensorimotor processing have been consistently reported in schizophrenia. However, the interaction between cognitive and sensorimotor impairments and the underlying neural mechanisms remains largely uncharted. We hypothesized that altered attentional processing in patients with schizophrenia, probed through saccadic inhibition, would partly explain impaired sensorimotor control and would be reflected as altered task-dependent modulation of cortical excitability and inhibition. Twenty-five stabilized patients with schizophrenia, 17 unaffected siblings and 25 healthy control subjects were recruited. Subjects performed visuomotor grip force-tracking alone (single-task condition) and with increased cognitive load (dual-task condition). In the dual-task condition, two types of trials were randomly presented: trials with visual distractors (requiring inhibition of saccades) or trials with addition of numbers (requiring saccades and addition). Both dual-task trial types required divided visual attention to the force-tracking target and to the distractor or number. Gaze was measured during force-tracking tasks, and task-dependent modulation of cortical excitability and inhibition were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. In the single-task, patients with schizophrenia showed increased force-tracking error. In dual-task distraction trials, force-tracking error increased further in patients, but not in the other two groups. Patients inhibited fewer saccades to distractors, and the capacity to inhibit saccades explained group differences in force-tracking performance. Cortical excitability at rest was not different between groups and increased for all groups during single-task force-tracking, although, to a greater extent in patients (80%) compared to controls (40%). Compared to single-task force-tracking, the dual-task increased cortical excitability in control subjects, whereas patients showed decreased excitability. Again, the group differences in cortical excitability were no longer significant when failure to inhibit saccades was included as a covariate. Cortical inhibition was reduced in patients in all conditions, and only healthy controls increased inhibition in the dual-task. Siblings had similar force-tracking and gaze performance as controls but showed altered task-related modulation of cortical excitability and inhibition in dual-task conditions. In patients, neuropsychological scores of attention correlated with visuomotor performance and with task-dependant modulation of cortical excitability. Disorganization symptoms were greatest in patients with weakest task-dependent modulation of cortical excitability. This study provides insights into neurobiological mechanisms of impaired sensorimotor control in schizophrenia showing that deficient divided visual attention contributes to impaired visuomotor performance and is reflected in impaired modulation of cortical excitability and inhibition. In siblings, altered modulation of cortical excitability and inhibition is consistent with a genetic risk for cortical abnormality.

scholarly journals Gait symmetry in the dual task condition as a predictor of future falls among independent older adults: a 2-year longitudinal study

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1057-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Gillain ◽  
Mohamed Boutaayamou ◽  
Cedric Schwartz ◽  
Nadia Dardenne ◽  
Olivier Bruyère ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Gait Symmetry

scholarly journals Effects of a Dual-Task Paradigm and Gait Velocity on Dynamic Gait Stability during Stair Descent

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qipeng Song ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Cui Zhang ◽  
Min Mao ◽  
Li Li
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Gait Velocity ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Gait Stability ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Dual Task Paradigm ◽  
Dynamic Gait

Falls during stair negotiation have become one of the leading causes of accidental death. The effects of a concurrent cognitive or manual dual-task paradigm on dynamic gait stability remain uncertain. How much dynamic gait stability is influenced by gait velocity is also not clear. A total of 16 healthy young females descended a staircase under three different walking conditions: descend stairs only (single task), descend stairs while performing subtraction (cognitive dual-task), and descend stairs while carrying a glass of water (manual dual-task). An eight-camera Vicon motion analysis system and a Kistler force plate embedded into the third step of the staircase were used synchronously to collect kinematic and kinetic data. Gait velocity decreased and dynamic gait stability increased with both cognitive and manual dual-task conditions. The center of mass–center of pressure inclination angle increased with gait velocity but decreased with the manual dual-task condition compared to the single-task condition. Changes in gait velocity caused by the dual-task paradigm can partially explain the effects of dual-task dynamic gait stability. The influence of gait velocity should be considered in the assessment of dual-task effects.

The effect of a perceptual cognitive task on exercise performance: the dual-task condition after brain injury

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Dawes ◽  
Janet Cockburn ◽  
N K Roach ◽  
Derick T Wade ◽  
Andrew Bateman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Exercise Performance ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Task Condition ◽  
Dual Task Condition
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document