Acquired Brain Injury Survivor Long-Term Cognitive Exercise Engagement Post–Speech Therapy Discharge

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Therese M. O'Neil-Pirozzi
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Exercise Participation ◽  
Cognitive Exercise

Purpose The purpose of this article is to promote the viewpoint that speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are well positioned to actively encourage individuals with cognitive-communication disorders following acquired brain injury (ABI) to engage in ongoing, long-term, cognitive exercise post–therapy discharge. Method This viewpoint article draws on evidence from the well-researched area of physical exercise, reports findings of early-stage research in the much less studied area of cognitive exercise, and highlights relevant aspects of motivational theory informing exercise participation. Informed by these, an evidence-supported model of cognitive exercise engagement is offered to inform ABI-targeted cognitive wellness empowerment efforts, and a case study illustrates clinical application of the model. Conclusions Exercise provides an opportunity to sustain or improve long-term health, function, and quality of life outcomes. It is within SLP scope of practice to collaborate with family members and other caregivers to empower individuals post-ABI, especially those with decreased self-management skills, to engage in long-term computerized and noncomputerized cognitive exercise following SLP therapy discharge. Ongoing research will further inform the evidence supporting the scholarly opinion presented in this viewpoint.

Right people, right time? a qualitative study of service access experiences of adults with acquired brain injury following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Michele Foster ◽  
Melissa Legg ◽  
Eloise Hummell ◽  
Letitia Burridge ◽  
Kirsty Laurie
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Service Access ◽  
Personal Recovery ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Perceived Needs ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Positive Experiences

Abstract Purpose: The intention of this paper is to develop the personal concept of appropriate access. We report on the service access experiences and opportunities of adults with an acquired brain injury after leaving inpatient rehabilitation. The benefits of appropriate access underpin standards in early and long-term recovery, though users’ access needs are highly personal. Methods: The study used a qualitative design involving 16 semi-structured interviews with Australian adults with an acquired brain injury after discharge from inpatient brain rehabilitation. Data were thematically analysed. Results: Three main themes were derived from the analysis. Theme 1 shows that participants valued being steered to services that providers thought appropriate for them early after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Theme 2 highlights the tensions between timing and personal recovery and perceived needs. Theme 3 captures participants’ insights into the challenges of gaining access vis-a-vis what the system offers and the enablers of actualising appropriate access. Conclusion: The positive experiences of being directed to specialist services early after discharge suggest that continuity of care constitutes appropriateness of access for participants in this study. However, it is also clear that continuity should not displace flexibility in the timing of services, to accord with individuals’ perceived needs. This, in addition to enablement of access opportunities, through funding and transport, are important in maintaining a personalised approach.

Serving Students With Acquired Brain Injury: Understanding Long-Term Need and Outcomes After the BrainSTEPS Program

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jessica Salley Riccardi ◽  
Libby Crook ◽  
Brenda Eagan-Johnson ◽  
Monica Vaccaro ◽  
Angela H. Ciccia
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Regular Education ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Transition Services ◽  
Student Outcome ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
School Based ◽  
Wide Range

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to inform school-based services for children with acquired brain injury (ABI) by describing and analyzing functional student-outcome data from a state-wide, school-based, school re-entry consultation program, BrainSTEPS (Strategies Teaching Educators, Parents, and Students), in Pennsylvania. Method: A nonexperimental, retrospective analysis was conducted with data collected during a pilot follow-up survey for BrainSTEPS. Caregivers reported on 337 students with ABI participating in BrainSTEPS. Results: Most students post-ABI who were participating in BrainSTEPS were enrolled in regular education and reported no ongoing symptoms, as well as no parent perception of need for additional BrainSTEPS consultation during the time period of the follow-up survey. Current receipt of therapy was significantly associated with injury type, χ 2 (1, n = 329) = 16.72, p < .001. A multiple logistic regression was significant ( p < .001) in predicting the need for additional BrainSTEPS consultation. More severe injuries, educational placement postinjury of regular education with a 504 plan (compared to regular education), and current receipt of therapy significantly increased the odds of need for consultation. Conclusions: Due to the wide range of experiences of students in this sample, hospital-to-school transition services, educational supports and services, and long-term follow-up must be individualized for children with ABI. Speech-language pathologists are critical members of the school-based academic team for students with ABI to decrease long-term unmet needs.

The Things that Help, the Things that Get in the Way: Working Together to Improve Outcome Following Acquired Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacinta M. Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Life Changes ◽  
Major Life ◽  
The Family ◽  
Working Together ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Way

Working in neurological rehabilitation brings with it numerous opportunities to gain an understanding of the factors that contribute to shaping meaningful living and wellbeing for those tackling the major life changes encountered following acquired brain injury (ABI). These opportunities come in many forms: challenging and brave clients, wise and worrying families, questioning and inspiring colleagues, empowering and limiting work environments and rigid and advancing policy and legislative contexts.Our personal and collective understanding ofthe things that helpandthe things that get in the wayof effective rehabilitation continuously emerges from the convergence of the experience and knowledge afforded by these opportunities. The aim of this paper is to considerthe things that helpandthe things that get in the wayas they have been identified by people with ABI, their families and those who work with them and have been further evidenced through research targeted towards improving short, medium and long-term outcomes for those living with the consequences of ABI. Thesethingsas discussed in this paper capture the essential role of the self, the importance of rights and access to rehabilitation, the impact of the family and the contribution of social connection.

scholarly journals THE NEW STIMULATING METHOD IN THE SPEECH THERAPY WORKOUT SYSTEM FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE SWALLOWING FUNCTION IN SEVERE BRAIN INJURIES

2020 ◽  
pp. 315-321
Author(s):  
Nataly I. Pryanikova
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Damage ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
New Method ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Severe Brain Injury ◽  
Swallowing Function ◽  
Positive Effects

Background. The significance of this study becomes more relevant due to the higher incidence and complication of dysphagia in patients with severe brain damage as a result of stroke, traumatic brain injury, and other diseases and injuries. Purpose The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the new stimulating method - "passive-active logopedic cryomassage" for restoring impaired swallowing function (dysphagia) in patients with severe brain injury, used in the system of speech therapy measures at the early stage of rehabilitation in the neurointensive care unit. Methods. The study involved 96 patients with dysphagia caused by severe brain damage, who received speech therapy assistance aimed at restoring the impaired swallowing function in a system of early rehabilitation measures carried out in a neurorehabilitation department. The severity of dysphagia was evaluated using an integrative assessment of swallowing function scale. Results. The practice of using the new method developed in combination with thermal and tactile stimulation: "passive-active logopedic cryomassage" indicated its higher efficiency in comparison with the traditionally used methods of speech therapy stimulation. In the course of this study, there were three categories of patients: patients with a rapid positive effect, patients with a delayed effect, and patients with no apparent positive effects. There was an analysis of all possible causes of different therapeutic effects. Conclusion. This new method of combined thermal and tactile stimulation - "passive-active logopedic cryomassage" can be recommended with all its indications and contraindications for widespread use in the clinical practice assisting speech therapists in the restoration of impaired swallowing function in patients with severe brain injury

scholarly journals Case management after acquired brain injury compared to care as usual: study protocol for a two-year pragmatic randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Stiekema ◽  
Christine Resch ◽  
Mireille Donkervoort ◽  
Natska Jansen ◽  
Kitty HM Jurrius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Family Needs ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: People with acquired brain injury may suffer from cognitive, emotional and behavioural changes in the long term. Continuity of care is often lacking, leading to a variety of unmet needs and hindering psychosocial functioning from the occurrence of brain injury up to years thereafter. Case management aims to prevent (escalation of) problems and to facilitate timely access to appropriate services. In other populations, case management has shown to improve psychosocial well-being. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of case management after acquired brain injury and its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, compared to care as usual.Methods: This is a pragmatic randomized controlled study with repeated measures in adults with ABI and their family, taking place between November 2019 and December 2021 in three provinces in the Netherlands. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the case management group, receiving case management from hospital discharge up to two years thereafter, or the control group, receiving care as usual. Effectiveness will be evaluated every six months for 18-24 months by patient-reported psychosocial well-being (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) restriction subscale and the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat)), self-management (Patient Activation Measure (PAM)) and care needs (Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)). Family outcomes include self-efficacy (Carer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES)), caregiver burden (Caregiver Strain Index (CSI)), psychosocial well-being (LiSat, HADS), family needs (Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ)). Feasibility will be evaluated using qualitative methods, assessing fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, reach, recruitment and context. Cost-effectiveness will be determined by the EQ-5D-3L and service use.Discussion: At the moment there is no integrated health care service for people with acquired brain injury and their family members in the long-term. If case management is shown to be feasible and (cost)-effective, it could bridge the gap between patients’ and families’ needs and the available services.Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, NL8104. Registered 22 October 2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8104.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document