Prevention of Tracheal High-Dose Tolerance Induction by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor- Dependent Restoration of Antigen-Presenting Cell Function

Endogenous cytokines are thought to mediate numerous biologic processes and may account for some adverse effects experienced following the administration of recombinant proteins. This study describes the pattern of endogenous cytokine exposure following high-dose chemotherapy. Blood concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and erythropoietin (EPO) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods in 68 patients receiving the same ablative chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, carmustine). Patients were grouped according to cellular support (autologous bone marrow [BM] CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitor cells [PBPCs]) and prescribed growth factor (recombinant human granulocyte or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [rHuG- CSF or rHuGM-CSF]). Leukocyte reconstitution was most accelerated in the groups treated with PBPCs and rHuG-CSF. IL-6, M-CSF, and TNF-alpha concentrations were higher in the groups treated with rHuGM-CSF and without PBPCs. Maximal endogenous cytokine concentrations occurred approximately 12 days after BM reinfusion. High concentrations of EPO occurred in patients experiencing significant hypotension despite routine transfusions for hematocrit < 42%. High M-CSF and IL-6 levels were associated with increased platelet transfusion requirements. Concentrations of all four cytokines were significantly higher in patients experiencing renal or hepatic toxicity, with elevations occurring in a predictable sequence and M-CSF elevations occurring first. This report shows that endogenous cytokine concentrations may be influenced by either cellular or CSF support and are associated with differences in platelet reconstitution and organ toxicity.

Download Full-text

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 fusion protein (pIXY 321) enhances high-dose Ara-C-induced programmed cell death or apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v80.11.2883.2883 ◽

1992 ◽

Vol 80 (11) ◽

pp. 2883-2890 ◽

Cited By ~ 37

Author(s):

K Bhalla ◽

C Tang ◽

AM Ibrado ◽

S Grant ◽

E Tourkina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Death ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Colony Growth ◽

Leukemia Cells ◽

High Dose ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Gm Csf ◽

Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Macrophage Colony ◽

Stimulating Factor

Abstract High dose Ara-C (HIDAC) induces programmed cell death (PCD) or apoptosis in vitro in human myeloid leukemia cells, which correlates with the inhibition of their clonogenic survival. Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM- CSF) and interleukin-3 (IL-3) have been demonstrated to enhance the metabolism and cytotoxic effects of HIDAC against leukemic progenitor cells. We examined the effect of pIXY 321 (a GM-CSF/IL-3 fusion protein) on HIDAC-induced PCD and related gene expressions as well as HIDAC-mediated colony growth inhibition of human myeloid leukemia cells. Unlike the previously described effects of HGFs on normal bone marrow progenitor cells, exposure to pIXY 321 alone for up to 24 hours did not suppress PCD in HL-60 or KG-1 cells. However, exposure to pIXY 321 for 20 hours followed by a combined treatment with Ara-C plus pIXY 321 for 4 or 24 hours versus treatment with Ara-C alone significantly enhanced the oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation characteristic of PCD. This was temporally associated with a marked induction of c-jun expression and a significant decrease in BCL-2. In addition, the treatment with pIXY 321 plus HIDAC versus HIDAC alone produced a significantly greater inhibition of HL-60 colony growth. These findings highlight an additional mechanism of HIDAC-induced leukemic cell death that is augmented by cotreatment with pIXY 321 and may contribute toward an improved antileukemic activity of HIDAC.

Download Full-text

Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at higher age or after relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v78.5.1190.1190 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 78 (5) ◽

pp. 1190-1197 ◽

Cited By ~ 125

Author(s):

T Buchner ◽

W Hiddemann ◽

M Koenigsmann ◽

M Zuhlsdorf ◽

B Wormann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Gm Csf ◽

Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Macrophage Colony ◽

Stimulating Factor ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract To reduce critical neutropenia after chemotherapy (CT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) we administered recombinant human granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to patients over the age of 65 years with newly diagnosed AML and to patients with early or second relapse. CT was 9-day 6-thioguanine, ara-C, and daunorubicin (TAD9) in newly diagnosed AML and sequential high-dose ara-C and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) for relapse. In patients whose bone marrow was free from blasts a continuous intravenous infusion of GM-CSF 250 micrograms/m2/d started on day 4 after CT. Thirty-six patients entered the study and 30 of them did receive GM-CSF. For comparison, a historical control group of 56 patients was used. Complete remission rate was 50% (18 of 36) versus 32% in controls (P = .09), and early death rate was 14% versus 39% (P = .009). Treatment with GM-CSF was not associated with major adverse events. Two patients showed a marked leukemic regrowth that was completely reversible in one patient and appeared to be GM-CSF independent in the other patient. Remission duration does not seem to be reduced after GM-CSF. Under GM-CSF the blood neutrophils recovered 6 and 9 days earlier in the TAD9 (P = .009) and S-HAM (P = .043) groups associated with a rapid clearance of infections in most patients. We conclude that GM-CSF was of therapeutic benefit to our patients and this provides a basis for larger controlled trials.

Download Full-text

Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.705 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 705-714 ◽

Cited By ~ 63

Author(s):

J L Passos-Coelho ◽

H G Braine ◽

J M Davis ◽

A M Huelskamp ◽

K G Schepers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Large Volume ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

High Dose ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Cell Content ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Macrophage Colony ◽

Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE (1) To study the ability of mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected in a single large-volume leukapheresis performed on a predetermined date to accelerate engraftment after high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa; (2) to establish the minimum dose of PBPC associated with early engraftment; and (3) to identify parameters predictive of collection of large numbers of PBPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-three patients with breast cancer received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ([GM-CSF] 5 micrograms/kg/d x 15 days) for PBPC mobilization. A single leukapheresis was performed 15 days after cyclophosphamide administration. Then, patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa followed by reinfusion of PBPC and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4HC)-purged bone marrow. PBPC concentration was measured in serial peripheral-blood samples and in the leukapheresis product. Correlation analysis between PBPC dose and engraftment and between leukapheresis yield and patient characteristics was attempted. RESULTS A single leukapheresis processed a median 36 L (range, 24 to 46) blood and collected 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (< 0.3 to 24) and 6.2 x 10(5) colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM)/kg (< 0.001 to 29). All sixteen patients (70%) reinfused with > or = 2.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg reached a level of greater than 1,000 leukocytes/microL by day 13 and greater than 50,000 platelets/microL by day 15. All of these patients had a percentage of peripheral-blood CD34+ cells > or = 0.5%, and all but one, a level of greater than 100,000 platelets/microL, on the day of leukapheresis. The bone marrow CD34+ cell percentage at study entry predicted the number of CD34+ cells collected after PBPC mobilization (R2 = .42, P = .002). All patients with > or = 2.5% bone marrow CD34+ cells experienced early engraftment. CONCLUSION Reinfusion of PBPC collected in a single leukapheresis accelerates engraftment in the majority of patients. Pretreatment bone marrow CD34+ cell content determines PBPC mobilization capacity and may help select hematopoietic rescue strategies.

Download Full-text

Abrogation of the Hematological and Biological Activities of the Interleukin-3/Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Fusion Protein PIXY321 by Neutralizing Anti-PIXY321 Antibodies in Cancer Patients Receiving High-Dose Carboplatin

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v93.10.3250.410k35_3250_3258 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 93 (10) ◽

pp. 3250-3258 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Langdon L. Miller ◽

Edward L. Korn ◽

Diane S. Stevens ◽

John E. Janik ◽

Barry L. Gause ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fusion Protein ◽

Antibody Formation ◽

Biological Effects ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

High Dose ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Interleukin 3 ◽

Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Macrophage Colony ◽

Stimulating Factor

This dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the hematologic activity, biological effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity of PIXY321 (an interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor fusion protein) administered after high-dose carboplatin (CBDCA) treatment. Patients with advanced cancers received CBDCA at 800 mg/m2 intravenously on day 0 of repeated 28-day cycles. In part A of the study, patients were treated with CBDCA alone during cycle 1 and then received PIXY321 on days 1 through 18 of cycle 2 and later cycles. In part B, patients received 18 days of PIXY321 beginning on day 1 of all CBDCA cycles, including cycle 1. PIXY321 was administered subcutaneously in 2 divided doses. Total doses of 135, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 μg/m2/d were administered to successive cohorts of 3 to 6 patients in part A. In part B, patient groups received PIXY321 doses of 750, 1,000, and 1,250 μg/m2/d. The hematologic effects of PIXY321 were assessed in the first 2 cycles of therapy. Anti-PIXY321 antibody formation was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutralization assay. Of the 49 patients enrolled, 31 were fully evaluable for hematologic efficacy. When comparing the first B cycle (cycle B-1; with PIXY321) with the first A cycle (cycle A-1; without PIXY321), the fusion protein had no significant effect on platelet nadirs or duration of platelets less than 20,000/μL but was able to speed the time of recovery of platelet counts to 100,000/μL (15v 20 days; P = .01). Significant improvements in neutrophil nadir and duration of ANC less than 500 were observed in cycles A-2 and B-1 (with PIXY321) as compared with cycle A-1 (without PIXY321). Initial PIXY321 prophylaxis (cycle A-2 and cycle B-1), enhanced the recovery of ANC to greater than 1,500/μL by an average of at least 8 days as compared with cycle A-1 (without PIXY321;P ≤ .004). However, positive PIXY321 hematologic effects were lost in the second course of PIXY321 among patients treated in part B. ELISA analysis showed that 92% of patients had developed neutralizing anti-PIXY321 antibodies by the completion of 2 PIXY321-containing cycles. The incidental action of PIXY321 to depress serum cholesterol levels was also abrogated during cycle B-2. We conclude that PIXY321 was active in speeding hematologic recovery but that neutralizing anti-PIXY321 antibody formation suppressed the hematologic and biochemical effects by the second cycle of PIXY321 administration. The immunogenicity of this fusion protein provides a cautionary warning that clinical development of bioengineered human molecules requires thorough testing for immune neutralization.

Download Full-text

Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Progenitor-Cell Mobilization: High-Dose Cyclophosphamide Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Versus Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Plus G-CSF

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2000.18.9.1824 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 18 (9) ◽

pp. 1824-1830 ◽

Cited By ~ 77

Author(s):

Omer N. Koç ◽

Stanton L. Gerson ◽

Brenda W. Cooper ◽

Mary Laughlin ◽

Howard Meyerson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progenitor Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell ◽

High Dose ◽

Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Hematopoietic Progenitor ◽

Gm Csf ◽

Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Macrophage Colony ◽

Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE: Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked. RESULTS: Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34+ cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units–granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P < .01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P = .025) or second (P = .02). The ability to achieve a target collection of ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34+ cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34+ cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34+ cell collected. CONCLUSION: We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.

Download Full-text