scholarly journals Research on the Relationship between Trade Volatility, Property Rights and New Energy Stock Returns under the Background of New Energy Industry Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 02017
Author(s):  
Qiyuan Peng
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Automobile Industry ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
New Energy ◽  
Trade Volatility ◽  
The Relationship

The research on the relationship between risk and return of new energy stocks is the focus of financial research. Related research focuses more on the relationship between idiosyncratic fluctuation risk and stock returns. In the Chinese stock market, some Chinese investors clearly prefer stocks with high risk characteristics, which leads to overvalued stocks. However, the short-selling restrictions in the Chinese stock market and the heterogeneity of investors have also led to a significant negative correlation between idiosyncratic volatility and cross-sectional yield. There are many studies on the relationship between idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns, but no consistent conclusions have been drawn, and there is a lack of relevant research on new energy stocks. Therefore. This paper collates the data of 70 listed companies in the new energy and new energy automobile industry from 2017 to 2019, tracks the stock returns of sample companies for 3 years (36 months), and conducts in-depth research on the relationship between idiosyncratic fluctuation risks and new energy stock returns. To further verify and supplement the risk-return relationship of China's new energy stock market and provide a certain basis for the company's decision-making behaviour.

Investor recognition and stock returns: evidence from China

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongquan Zhu ◽  
Lingling Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Monthly Return ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose Merton’s model of capital market equilibrium under incomplete information predicts that contemporaneous stock returns are positively related to investor recognition and that future stock returns are negatively related to investor recognition. The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate whether Merton’s theory holds true for the Chinese stock market. Design/methodology/approach This paper proposes the degree of shareholder base growth (SBG) as a proxy for investor recognition and examines the relationship between investor recognition and stock returns through a univariate analysis and Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regressions based on A-Share listed firms. Findings The results show that investor recognition is nonlinearly and positively related to contemporaneous stock returns and is negatively related to future stock returns in contrast to the conclusions of Merton’s theory. A long-short trading strategy that involves buying stocks with the lowest SBG rate and that sells stocks with the highest SBG rate will earn an average monthly return of 3.615 percent. Research limitations/implications Though Merton’s theory is not fully reflected in the Chinese stock market, investor recognition is considered an important risk factor in the Chinese stock market. Originality/value No works have yet investigated the validity of Merton’s “investor cognition hypothesis” in relation to the Chinese stock market. This paper strives to fill this gap.

Heterogeneous beliefs and idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: evidence from China

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao He ◽  
Juncheng Huang ◽  
Hongquan Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Heterogeneous Beliefs ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Volatility Puzzle ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle

PurposeThe purpose of our study is to explore the “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle” in Chinese stock market from the perspective of investors' heterogeneous beliefs. To delve into the relationship between idiosyncratic volatility and investors' heterogeneous beliefs, and uncover the ability of heterogeneous beliefs, as well as to explain the “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle”, we construct our study as follows.Design/methodology/approachOur study adopts the unexpected trading volume as proxies of heterogeneity, the residual of Fama–French three-factor model as proxies of idiosyncratic volatility. Portfolio strategies and Fama–MacBeth regression are used to investigate the relationship between the two proxies and stock returns in Chinese A-share market.FindingsInvestors' heterogeneous beliefs, as an intermediary variable, are positively correlated with idiosyncratic volatility. Meanwhile, it could better demonstrate the negative correlation between the idiosyncratic volatility and future stock returns. It is one of the economic mechanisms linking idiosyncratic volatility to subsequent stock returns, which can account for 11.28% of the puzzle.Originality/valueThe findings indicate that idiosyncratic volatility is significantly and positively correlated with heterogeneous beliefs and that heterogeneous beliefs are effective intervening variables to explain the “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle”.

scholarly journals Research on Investment Preference and the MAX Effect in Chinese Stock Market

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-533
Author(s):  
Xiaoju Gou ◽  
Limei Bie
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Turnover Rate ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Portfolio Analysis ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
Volatility Puzzle

AbstractInvestors prefer to invest the stocks with high history returns, which results in that the return of the stock with high history maximum return is often lower than that with low history maximum return, i.e., the MAX effect. We show that the MAX effect is also significant in China stock market, that is, there is a significant negative relationship between maximum return and expected return. We then conduct portfolio analysis and Fama-Macbeth cross-sectional regression and find that range of price and turnover rate can explain the MAX effect in a certain extent, idiosyncratic volatility and idiosyncratic skewness cannot explain the negative relationship between maximum return and expected return. Moreover, maximum return explains the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle partially.

scholarly journals Sustainability Managed against Downside Risk and the Cost of Equity: Evidence in Korea

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3969
Author(s):  
Truong Thuy ◽  
Jungmu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Korean Stock Market ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Relationship

This study examines the relationship between sustainability managed against downside risk and the cost of equity in the Korean stock market during the 2000–2016 period. We employ downside co-skewness and downside beta as a measure of downside risk, to analyze the cross-sectional relationship between them and average portfolio stock returns. We have also carried out Fama–MacBeth regressions to find the required return for bearing downside risk. The results show that downside co-skewness can be used more effectively than downside beta to explain a cross-section of stock returns or cost of equity. The required premium for bearing downside risk, as measured by downside co-skewness, is approximately 19% per annum in the Korean stock market. This finding suggests that sustainable companies can raise their capital in the form of equity at 19% lower costs, and also implies that increasing sustainability can reduce the cost of capital.

scholarly journals Media Coverage and Sustainable Stock Returns: Evidence from China

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Yang ◽  
Jinsong Liu ◽  
Qianwei Ying ◽  
Tahir Yousaf
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Media Coverage ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Investor Attention ◽  
Monthly Data ◽  
News Reports ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Relationship

This paper explores the relationship between media coverage and stock returns using monthly data of news reports from major Chinese newspapers. We find that firms with higher media coverage in the current month have higher sustainable stock returns in the following months over a one-year period compared with those with lower media coverage, which means that media coverage has a more significant and positive influence on sustainable stock returns in the markets, dominated by individual/immature investors. These results are largely robust to various robustness checks. Further empirical results demonstrate that in the Chinese stock market, a higher level of media coverage might cause higher sustained investor attention, which may drive up the buying pressure and thus lead to higher sustainable stock returns in the following year. Our results show that the effect of media coverage on stock returns depends on the characteristics of investors.

scholarly journals Idiosyncratic Volatility and Cross-section of Stock Returns: Evidences from India

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Prashant Sharma ◽  
Brajesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility ◽  
Expected Returns ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Indian Stock Market ◽  
The Relationship

<p>The present study examines the cross-sectional pricing ability of idiosyncratic volatility (IV) in Indian stock market and investigates the relationship amongst expected idiosyncratic volatility (EI), unexpected idiosyncratic volatility (UI), and cross-section of stocks returns. The study uses ARIMA (2, 0, 1) model to IV into EI and UI. The stocks returns are regressed on IV, EI and UI using Newey-West (1987) corrections, in order to investigate their empirical relationship.  The study finds that IV is positively related with stock returns. Further the IV significantly explains the cross-section of stock returns in Indian context. After imposing control over UI, as it is highly correlated with unexpected returns, the inter-temporal relationship between EI and expected returns turns out to be positive.</p>

scholarly journals The cross-section of expected stock returns and components of idiosyncratic volatility

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Seyed Reza Tabatabaei Poudeh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Idiosyncratic Volatility ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Expected Stock Returns ◽  
Book To Market Ratio ◽  
Alpha Risk ◽  
The Relationship

We examine the relationship between stock returns and components of idiosyncratic volatility—two volatility and two covariance terms— derived from the decomposition of stock returns variance. The portfolio analysis result shows that volatility terms are negatively related to expected stock returns. On the contrary, covariance terms have positive relationships with expected stock returns at the portfolio level. These relationships are robust to controlling for risk factors such as size, book-to-market ratio, momentum, volume, and turnover. Furthermore, the results of Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regression show that only alpha risk can explain variations in stock returns at the firm level. Another finding is that when volatility and covariance terms are excluded from idiosyncratic volatility, the relation between idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns becomes weak at the portfolio level and disappears at the firm level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document